Edmund Storms HYDROTON A Model of Cold Fusion

Ruby Carat and the Cold Fusion Now! collective have released a new video documentary, this time tackling cold fusion theory with Edmund Storms HYDROTON A Model of Cold Fusion.

The 28-minute science special continues where the book The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction left off. It features Dr. Edmund Storms describing his theory of the cold fusion/LENR reaction that focuses on the unusual form of hydrogen that can form in the nano-spaces of materials.

Nano-cracks in materials will have a high negative-charge along the walls of the space, allowing positively-charged hydrogen nuclei to be closer than they normally could.

Subject to resonance, the hypothesis proposes a linear array of hydrogen nuclei and electrons in the nano-crack that can engage in a “slow fusion” process, whereby the smaller bits of mass turn to energy by releasing coherent photons.

If true, the mechanism would be an extension of conventional nuclear models which only describes fusion in a hot plasma, where nuclei collide violently to fuse.

The action is animated by artist Jasen Chambers who modeled all the isotopes of hydrogen in the unique LENR process.

Ruby Carat has had multiple interviews with Dr. Storms since 2011, most recently in the offices of Cold Fusion Now! in Eureka, California, US. That video composite describes the Nano-gap Hydroton Model and its development.

Hypotheses of the Nano-gap Hydroton model are currently being tested for confirmation.

See Edmund Storms HYDROTON A Model of Cold Fusion on the Cold Fusion Now! Youtube page here: https://youtu.be/D4BPtwzsgiw

Edmund Storms’ book The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: An Examination of the Relationship between Observation and Explanation is available from his website http://www.lenrexplained.com

Dr. Edmund Storms website http://www.lenrexplained.com

HYDROTON animation by Jasen Chambers http://jasenlux.com

Title animation by Augustus Clark and Mike Harris http://augustusclark.com

Music by Esa Ruoho a.k.a. lackluster https://lackluster.bandcamp.com

ICCF-18 video by Eli Elliott http://www.elienation.com

Filmed, edited and narrated by Ruby Carat https://twitter.com/ColdFusionNow

Our work supports Cold Fusion Now! and Eugene Mallove’s Infinite Energy Foundation. We hope you will too.



Cold Fusion Now Stats November



At Cold Fusion Now, we believe that new energy information is best distributed far and wide. Our readership, and the readership of all cold fusion LENR information media, is growing worldwide. More and more people are learning of this important technology. We hope when it goes mainstream… many will already be aware.

To continue our tradition of actively spreading the news, this letter with links was sent as a message to the facebook sights of the following universities over the Veterans Day Weekend. The list is of universities whose facebook page allows a message to be sent to the administrator. No posting was made directly to the wall, we invite them to do so.


Here are a couple of links to a technology that is advancing from the cutting edge research phase to the research and engineering phase.

Study the present day state of the art of this science and you may find yourself wanting to create a post for your readers to follow.

With warm regards and electrifying anticipation,

Cold Fusion Now Org

“Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, the Realism and the Outlook” by Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center

“Is Commercial LENR the Real Deal?”

  1. Alabama State University
  2. Al-Azhar University
  3. Aleppo University
  4. Amity University
  5. Appalachian State University
  6. Arizona State University
  7. Ashanna Solaris
  8. Assumption University of Thailand
  9. Ateneo de Manila University
  10. Atmel University Program
  11. AUC The American University in Cairo
  12. Bahria University
  13. Baliwan University
  14. Ball So Hard University
  15. Barry University
  16. Beyoglu / Taksim, Istanbul
  17. Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University
  18. BYU (Brigham Young University)
  19. Cairo University جامعه القاهرة
  20. California State University, Fullerton
  21. Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar
  22. Central Michigan University Alumni Association
  23. Chix University XD
  24. Chulalongkorn University
  25. Cornell University
  26. Coventry University
  27. Cute University
  28. DeVry University
  29. Duke University
  30. Edinburgh Napier University
  31. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
  32. EMO University
  33. European University Cyprus
  34. Far Eastern University
  35. FB University
  36. Galgotias University
  37. George Mason University
  38. Georgia State University
  39. Grand Canyon University
  40. Graphic Era University DehraDun
  41. Gulf Medical University, Ajman
  42. Hajvery University
  43. Harvard University
  44. Heliopolis University For Sustainable Development
  45. I Love NED University
  46. Indiana University
  47. Iqra University – IU
  48. Islamic Online University
  49. K.L.H. University
  50. Kasetsart University
  51. Kennedy University
  52. Liberty University
  53. London Metropolitan University – India
  54. Lovely Professional University
  55. Mahatma Gandhi University
  56. Mansoura University – جامعة المنصورة
  57. Marquette University
  58. Mathare University of Insane Creativity
  59. Mbare University of the Wise
  60. Mississippi State University
  61. Monash University
  62. MVN University
  63. National University College Online
  64. National University of Singapore
  65. North Carolina State University
  66. Northwest Missouri State University
  67. October 6th University جامعة 6 اكتوبر
  68. Open University Malaysia
  69. Oregon State University
  70. Our Lady of Fatima University
  71. Oxford Brookes University
  72. Oxford University
  73. Oxford University Press – ELT
  74. Perdana College / UCSI University
  75. Pharos University In Alexandria
  76. Polytechnic University of the Philippines
  77. Polytechnic University of the Philippines
  78. Princeton University
  79. Purdue University
  80. Qarshi University
  81. Rack City University
  82. Rangsit University,Thailand
  83. Roger Williams University
  84. San Diego State University
  85. San Francisco State University
  86. San Jose State University
  87. Sex University
  88. Sharda University
  89. Sikkim Manipal University
  90. Silpakorn University
  91. Single’s University
  92. South University
  93. Strayer University
  94. Superior University
  95. Syracuse University
  96. Taylor Gang University
  97. Texas A&M University
  98. Texas Tech University
  99. The American University of Iraq
  100. The Open University
  101. The University of Alabama
  102. The University of Arizona
  103. The University of Chicago
  104. The University of Glasgow
  105. The University of Kansas
  106. The University of Kentucky Wildcats
  107. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  108. The University of Oklahoma
  109. The University Of Swag
  110. Thompson Rivers University – TRU World
  111. University Directory
  112. University of Cambridge
  113. University of Central Florida
  114. University Of Central Punjab
  115. University of Colorado Boulder
  116. University of Florida
  117. University of Georgia
  118. University of Hawaii, School of Architecture
  119. University of Iowa
  120. University of Jordan
  121. University of Karachi
  122. University Of Lahore
  123. University of Louisiana at Lafayette
  124. University of Malaya
  125. University of Miami
  126. University of Michigan
  127. University of Minnesota
  128. University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  129. University of North Texas
  130. University of One Directionism
  131. University of Oregon
  132. University of Oregon Ducks
  133. University of Oxford
  134. University of Phoenix
  135. University of South Florida
  136. University of Southern California
  137. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  138. University of the People
  139. University of the Philippines
  140. University of Toronto
  141. University of Washington
  142. University of Wisconsin-Madison
  143. UNSW (The University of New South Wales)
  144. VanHolland University-Training Center-Egypt Office
  145. Vels University
  146. Victor Lee Lewis
  147. Virginia Commonwealth University
  148. VIT University
  149. Walden University
  150. Webster University Thailand
  151. Webster University Vienna
  152. Wind Virtual University
  153. Yale University
  154. Yarmouk University | جامعة اليرموك
  155. جامعة الثورة | University Of Revolution



Due to the importance of energy to the U.S. Armed Forces and the worldwide struggle for energy  supply  and it’s effect on “Energizing the Warfighter” (see DoD) (which measures the cost of oil not in dollars but cost in blood of our military);  more effort was expended on this outreach during the Veterans Day Weekend. Please read the article “Economics of Cold Fusion LENR Power Department of Defense” (link)

One of these three letters was sent to each of the following News Agencies and Activist Organizations:



Please include low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) technology as part of your political discourse on energy.

The NASA Series

“Real Popular Cold Fusion”
“Cold Fusion NASA LENR – Future”
“Cold Fusion NASA LENR – part two Flight”
“Cold Fusion NASA LENR – part three Spacebound and Earthbound Transportation”

Thank You,

Cold Fusion Now Org



If you are not up on the science of cold fusion LENR – Low Energy Nuclear Reaction; I’m hoping you enjoy studying this. Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist of NASA Langley, states this is the solution to global warming.

The NASA series has a link to his paper. This should be part of any discourse on clean air, energy, and environment.

“Global Warming Climate Change and Cold Fusion LENR Power”


Thank you,

Cold Fusion Now



This is a news tip for you about a Cold Fusion LENR Powered Boeing 747 being developed by NASA.

May 2012 NASA Contract NNL08AA16B – NNL11AA00T – “Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research – Phase II”
N+4 Advanced Concept Development


“Even though we do not know the specific cost of the LENR itself, we assumed a cost of jet fuel at $4/gallon and weight based aircraft cost. We were able to calculate cost per mile for the LENR equipped aircraft compared to a conventional aircraft (Figure 3.2). Looking at the plots, one could select a point where the projected cost per mile is 33% less than a conventionally powered aircraft.”

3.0 LENR Requirements Analysis …pg 24
Figure 3.1 – Potential Heat Engines for LENR Systems ..pg 25
Figure 3.2 – Parametric LENR and Heat Engine Performance Parameters ……………….pg 25
6.2.3 Low Energy Nuclear Reactor Technologies ……pg 82
Table 6.3 – LENR Technologies Success Criteria …….pg 86
Also pgs 15, 18, 19, 20, and 21.

These are the 39 folks who have been involved in this since May, 2011

Bradley, Marty (Boeing)
Daggett, David (Boeing)
Droney, Christopher(Boeing)
Hoisington, Zachary (Boeing)
Kirby, Michelle (GT)
Murrow, Kurt (GE)
Ran, Hongjun (GT)
Nam, Teawoo (GT)
Tai, Jimmy (GT)
Hammel, Jeff (GE)
Perullo, Chris (GT)
Guynn, Mark (NASA)
Olson, Erik (NASA)
Leavitt, Larry (NASA)
Allen, Timothy (Boeing)
Cotes, Dwaine (Boeing)
Guo, Yueping (Boeing)
Foist, Brian (Boeing)
Rawdon, Blaine (Boeing)
Wakayama, Sean (Boeing)
Dallara, Emily (Boeing)
Kowalski, Ed (Boeing)
Wat, Joe (Boeing)
Robbana, Ismail (Boeing)
Barmichev, Sergey (Boeing)
Fink, Larry (Boeing)
Sankrithi, Mithra (Boeing)
White, Edward (Boeing)
Gowda, Srini (GE)
Brown, Gerald (NASA)
Wahls, Richard (NASA)
Wells, Doug (NASA)
Jeffries, Rhett (FAA)
Felder, James (NASA)
Schetz, Joe (VT)
Burley, Casey (NASA)
Sequiera, Christopher (FAA)
Martin, John (NASA)
Kapania, Rakesh (VT)

Maybe you could interview a few of these guys… see what they have to say about the emerging LENR technology (popularly known as cold fusion). “Real Popular Cold Fusion” https://coldfusionnow.org/real-popular-cold-fusion/

Thank you,

Cold Fusion Now Org


  1. 7 Day News Journal
  2. 9 News
  3. ABC News
  4. ABP News
  6. Alfetna News
  7. Almadenah News
  8. Alrai Newspaper
  9. American Free Enterprise
  10. Asianet News
  11. BBC News
  12. Bloomberg News
  13. Bollywood News
  14. Breaking News
  15. CBS News
  16. CERES Environment Park
  17. Dap_News_Website
  18. Dawn News
  19. Eco Era America
  20. Eco-structure Magazine
  21. Environment
  22. Environment
  23. Environment Agency
  24. Environment California
  25. Environment Canada
  26. Environmental Action
  27. Environmental Defence Canada
  28. Environmental Defense Fund
  29. Environmental Graffiti
  30. Environmental Health News
  31. Environmental Science & Policy at Taylor & Francis
  32. Environmental Working Group
  33. Environmentally Smarter
  34. Equine News Today
  35. Express News
  36. Express News
  37. Faking News
  38. Football News
  39. Foot’s Forecast | United States
  40. Forward
  41. Freaking News Pictures
  42. Gaming News Daily
  43. Geo News Urdu
  44. GMA News
  45. Indigenous Environmental Network
  46. Jannat News
  47. Jews News
  48. KSDK NewsChannel 5
  49. LFC NEWS
  50. Milky Way Scientists
  51. MotorSports News
  52. MTV
  53. MTV News
  54. Myanmar News Now
  55. NBC News Business
  56. NBC News US
  57. News
  58. News • Music • Fun • Kora
  59. News Butterfly
  60. News Live-أخبار مباشر
  61. News Media Network
  62. News Room | غرفة الأخبار
  63. News Update
  64. News.Architecture.SK
  65. News.Ge
  66. Newsarama
  67. Newsbeast
  68. NewsBusters.org
  69. Newsquod
  70. Newsweek Pakistan
  71. Odd News on Yahoo! News
  72. P.N.N | News
  73. Pew Environment Group
  74. Progressive
  75. RNN | News
  76. Save Environment
  77. Shorouk News
  78. Sky News Arabia
  79. Space.com
  80. Syria News
  81. Taekwondo News
  82. The Environmental Blog
  83. The Everlasting GOP Stoppers
  84. The Free World Charter
The NASA Series
  85. The Rachel Maddow Show
  86. The Realist
  87. This is NPR
  88. Untold News
  89. USAction
  90. USGBC – National Capital Region
  91. Vanguard News
  92. World News with Diane Sawyer
  93. WWE News – اخبار مصارعة المحترفين
  94. Yahoo! News UK & Ireland
  95. Yale Environment 360
  96. Yengo News


11-14 UPDATE

The pain over our continuing struggle for energy… I feel it. The destruction from our present process… utilization… and use of energy… will be ending soon.

Helping to usher it in, the tradition continues of sending new energy information to groups of concerned citizens.

The following message was sent to site administrators of the following facebook groups. No posting was made to the wall.

We invite them to do so.


Here are a couple of links to a technology that is advancing from the cutting edge research phase to the research and engineering phase.

Study the present day state of the art of this science and you may find yourself wanting to create a post for your readers to follow.

With warm regards and electrifying anticipation,

Cold Fusion Now Org

“Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, the Realism and the Outlook”
by Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center

“Is Commercial LENR the Real Deal?”

NASA states the energy of LENR power is the solution to global warming.
Halt oil production.
This article has info.
“Global Warming Climate Change and Cold Fusion LENR Power”

Thank you for the loving work you do… we LOVE you.
Prose as a gift… use when you like.


It’s of great use to wonder…
Why our minds wander

In awe of it all

Being forever true
Seeking the new

We are just now discovering
That which has always been

Impatiently awaiting us

Craving our keen attention

Hoping for deeper understanding

Awesome is
The wonder of discovery

And the power
Of awe


cold fusion now org

gbgoble g mail .com…


  1. A Tar Sands Referendum
  2. Against Keystone XL Pipeline
  3. Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation – Case against the Tar Sands
  4. Before It Starts.org – Keep Tar Sands and Oil Shale Mining Out of the USA
  5. Build the Keystone Pipeline
  6. Canadian Tar Sands = Unethical Oil
  7. Can-Am Against The Keystone XL Pipeline
  8. Cascadia Tar Sands Action
  9. Coalition Against Keystone XL Pipeline
  10. Darryl Hannah Opposes Keystone Pipeline
  11. Demand for a National Referendum on Closing the Tar Sands
  12. Denton Supports Tar Sands Blockade
  13. Denver Tar Sands Action
  14. Draw the Line at TarSands
  15. EI Tar Sands
  16. Ending Investment in Tar Sands
  17. Keystone Pipeline Protest
  18. Keystone XL pipeline – Tarsands – SAY NO
  19. Kill the Keystone Pipeline
  20. Madison Tar Sands Action Group
  21. My Tar Sands Duck Dinner with Andrea
  22. No Tar Sands
  23. No Tar Sands Caravan
  24. No Tar Sands Caravan from CA to DC
  25. No Tar Sands in Maine
  26. NO to the Pipelines! NO to the TAR Sands
  27. Occupy Keystone XL Pipeline Route
  28. Ottawa Tar Sands Action/Action Halte aux sables bitunimeux à Ottawa
  29. President Obama “vote NO” on the Keystone XL Pipeline
  30. Say NO To The Keystone Pipeline
  31. Stop Alberta Oil Sands Growth
  32. Stop Filming Hobbit in Tar Sands
  33. Stop Northern Gateway
  34. Stop Suncor and Tar Sands
  35. Stop The Alberta Tar Sands – Global
  36. Stop The Flow! End Tar Sands Transport in the Trans Mountain Pipeline
  37. STOP the Keystone Pipeline
  38. Stop the Keystone XL Pipeline PDX
  39. Stop the Keystone XL Pipeline, No More Dirty Tar Sands Oil
  40. Stop the Mining in the Alberta Tar Sands
  41. Stop the Tar Sands KW
  42. STOP The Tar Sands Oil Keystone XL PIPELINE
  43. STOP TransCanada’s Keystone XL Oil Pipeline Project in our (USA) Soil
  44. Students Against the Keystone Pipeline
  45. Support the Keystone XL Pipeline
  46. Tar Sand Betties Roller Derby League
  47. Tar Sands
  48. Tar Sands
  49. Tar Sands Action
  50. Tar Sands Action – Southern California
  51. Tar Sands Action ~ Stop Keystone XL Pipeline
  52. Tar Sands Action- Maine
  53. Tar Sands Action Seattle
  54. Tar Sands Activists
  55. Tar Sands Blockade
  56. Tar Sands Blockade – Houston
  57. Tar Sands Day
  58. Tar Sands Free
  59. Tar Sands Free Arizona
  60. Tar Sands Free Northeast
  61. Tar Sands of $hell Are Tar Sands of Hell
  62. Tar Sands Oil Horrors
  63. Tar Sands Song
  64. Tar Sands Students
  65. Tar Sands: Alberta, Canada
  66. Tar Sands: The Inherent Dangers
  67. Texans Against Tar Sands
  68. Texas Tar Sands Truth Teller
  69. The Anti-Keystone XL Pipeline
  70. The Beaver Lake Cree vs Tar Sands
  71. The Tar Sands
  72. Utah Tar Sands Resistance



An analysis of the effect on stats will follow in an addendum to this article. An Anomalous Spike is expected.

Lectures From Daejeon

The videos of the lecture from Daejeon ICCF-17 have arrived. I must lay out the ground rules and provisos.  I am not allowed to rebroadcast the lectures. I am not allowed to release the password.  These are the wishes of the conveners and I have to respect them.  They, the Cold Fusion, experimenters and presenters of the lectures are the heroes of this story, not I. I am but a member of the peanut gallery.

I feel that I am at liberty to give my impression of the lectures, however you must understand that my comprehension is very limited. If that is unsatisfactory you only have yourself to blame. You should have been there.

The first lecture I shall write about is that given by Professor Hagelstein.  Here is what I understood of his lecture.  Professor Hagelstein is a theoretician. He is tasked with creating models explaining the empirical results of the Experimenters. The gold standard of a model is it’s predictive power.

Model 281 did not work and had to buried out in the back yard. However it was intuitively correct.  It predicted a coupling of phonon energy and nuclear energy. Takahashi objected to the model on the grounds that it was not reversible. It would not transmit energy in both directions. Professor Hagelstein thought this might be due to losses.

There are two elements in the coupling process: the nucleus and the phonons. The nuclear energy is too large and the phonon energy is too small. What Professor Hagelstein needed was a nuclear energy 100 times smaller, so he turned to Quarks. And then things began to look a lot brighter. How bright? 1.5keV x-ray bright. You see Karabut had been rabbiting on at a previous ICCF meeting that he was obtaining 1.5keV x-rays from his gas discharge experiments.

And then events began to make Professor Hagelstein fall off his chair in amazement and delight.  He fell off his chair three times to be exact. I would love to tell you why he fell off his chair but he began to babble mathematics and so I was lost.

However all was not lost because I managed to get something about a lossy spin Boson chopping his energy up into small enough pieces so that they were digestible by the phonons. I have a picture of a carrier wave of a radio signal that might help you visualize the coupling of the two elements. The short signal wave is the energetic nuclear and the longer carrier signal is the low energy of the phonons.

Professor Hagelstein described the process creating the x-rays was as if a little hammer was striking the surface of the mercury repeatedly.

The energy distribution of the collimated x-rays fit professor Hagelstein’s equations beautifully. The more energetic the hammer blows the broader the x-ray, which makes sense to me.

OK.  Let’s pull this thing together.

We now have a channel for energy to flow from the nucleus to the matrix and vice versa.  So, mass in the Nucleus can be annihilated and the energy transmitted to the “outside world” beyond the Coulomb barrier, and energy can also flow into the nucleus from phonons coupled to the nucleus. This energy is stored as Mass. And we all know what happens if you increase the mass of a nucleus, don’t we. It transmutes.

I am guessing either to another isotope if the mass is large enough to be a neutron, or into another element.  Professor Hagelstein said that a geologist told him that there is more aluminum along fault lines and less iron.

Your homework is to figure out why.  And that is as good as it gets for now.

Petition: Cold Fusion Renewable Energy Development

A renewed Cold Fusion Renewable Energy Petition is still alive at Change.org.   Sign this petition now.

Cold Fusion atomic energy has been ignored and pushed aside in discussions/ presentations about alternative energy for too long. Advantages include little/no radioactive decay matter, and extremely high energy output. As an example, 1 or 2 future-generation generators themselves could power a metropolis city the size of Los Angeles, California for a month on one small supply of common inexpensive elements. Current energy generation comes from more than 5-sources. World leaders in nations/unions such as Japan, The United States of America, Russia, South Africa, The European Union, and so on have the ability and power to fully engage in the building mass energy production plants now.  “Nuclear fission power plants and weapons are dangerous.”

As of 07/02/2012 this is now an international petition.

This is among the safest, cleanest, and most powerful energy resources that has been proven to be as or more productive than coal, and nuclear fission; which is more commonly known. Other technologies based on science fiction stories like the various Star Trek television series from the 1960’s through recent series, offer multiple ideas that need to be officially explored further. Use of this energy source has the potential of replacing oil, coal, and natural gas use worldwide. The nation that does this first would likely reduce foreign dependence by 100%, erase it’s own and most other nations trade debts and retain all funds used towards purchasing foreign energy resources. The conservative powers that currently exist and the energy corporations that want to hold onto their dominance are fighting this in every way possible.

An accommodating resource of energy using a smaller cold fusion engine can also power vehicles of all sizes.  World leaders need to endorse this safer alternative too. Job losses may initially be massive but 3x to 10x more jobs would be created. Worldwide unemployment would drop dramatically due to increased lower cost energy availability.

We are in a new and more open time to succeed. Let’s make them listen and act for the people, our planet, not the corporate billionaires and subservient politicians!

Please sign this worlwide petition and forward this article: (Click Here)

NASA Information (Link)  …More proof!

LENR and the Paradigm of Abundance

We undergo periodic ”paradigm shifts” rather than solely progressing in a linear and continuous way. These paradigm shifts open up new approaches to understanding what was considered invalid before. This implies that the notion of truth, at any given moment, cannot be established solely by objective criteria and is defined by consensus reality.

For instance, most people’s notion of the truth is the “Scarcity paradigm.” An example of the Scarcity paradigm is the belief that while food production expands linearly, population grows exponentially.

In other words, comparing worldwide population growth rates to global resource consumption rates it seems clear that we are running out of resources (and time). Right now there is almost seven billion people and by mid-century it will probably be around ten billion.

We are running out of food, water, fish, and oil to satisfy this rapidly growing population.

Since 2005 the price of wheat, corn, and rice has more than tripled, which reflects a dwindling of global food stocks. We are already farming around 80% of the arable land with reports on climate change showing crop production declining by ten to twenty percent in the next ten years. By 2030 demand for food is expected to increase 50%.

Only half a percent of the world’s water is fresh, and many aquifers have been nearly pumped dry, so demand will far outstrip the supply in the next 30 years.

Bottom trawling destroys about 6 million square miles of sea floor each year, and according to most projections we will be the generation that will run out of wild fish.

But worse is running out of oil because the modern world was built with it and runs on it. It takes about ten calories of oil to produce one calorie of food. Around half of the fuel consumed is oil product and more than half of that oil is used for transportation, a very fast growing sector of the world economy. It is estimated that demand for oil will increase 50% by 2025.

On the other hand, oil production has been flat since 2005. Peak oil, the point when maximum oil extraction has been reached (after which it will go into terminal decline) is near.

Such facts bring about cynicism, pessimism, and despair. Most people believe that the world is going downhill fast and there is nothing anyone can do about it. The hole is too deep to climb out of, and any information that confirms that suspicion will be remembered, while conflicting data will not even register – a confirmation bias.

Furthermore, there is a direct link between imagination and perception. We are saturated with “if it bleeds it leads” news reports. Our brain evolved prioritizing immediate threats, and while many dangers are probabilistic, our mind can’t easily differentiate between the improbable and the likely.

This knee jerk things-are-going-down-hill moaning pessimism is incredible from people living amid luxury and security that their ancestors would have died for. Innovation has played a huge role in averting disaster.

For instance, mankind was reaching the limit of our ability to feed ourselves when early 20th century chemists invented a technology to produce fertilizer. The Haber process sustains one-third of the population today, and it is estimated that half the protein within human beings is made of nitrogen that was originally fixed by this technology.

Optimism rather than pessimism is a sounder basis for a paradigm accessing reality. A true measurement of something’s worth is the hours it takes to acquire it, and we undoubtedly have more free time and more ways to spend it than our ancestors.

We’ve seen enormous progress in the last couple of centuries. Today, most poverty-stricken Americans have a TV, telephone, electricity, running water, a refrigerator, and indoor plumbing, luxuries the richest men on the planet didn’t have one hundred years ago.

In particular, there is a new clean, very very cheap, and super abundant energy technology emerging called “Low Energy Nuclear Reaction” (LENR for short). It uses hydrogen and nickel to produce heat. No nuclear materials are used for fuel, and none are produced.

“A volume about the size of a #2 pencil eraser of water provides as much energy as two 48-gallon drums of gasoline. That is 355,000 times the amount of energy per volume – five orders of magnitude.” ( http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/New-LENR-Machine-is-the-Best-Yet.html ).

This phenomenon (LENR) has been confirmed in hundreds of published scientific papers: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf

“Over 2 decades with over 100 experiments worldwide indicate LENR is real, much greater than chemical…” —Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center

“Total replacement of fossil fuels for everything but synthetic organic chemistry.” —Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny, NASA

Unfortunately, the Scarcity paradigm is preventing people from believing this. The real possibility of electricity too cheap to meter is dismissed due to a confirmation bias. People’s minds can’t readily imagine this new energy technology being real, so they perceive that it is impossible.

Since any new technology needs investment for research and development, this Scarcity paradigm is a self-fulfilling prophesy. While there are new technologies emerging to address a score of scarcity issues like clean water, food availability, sewage disposal, security, housing, communication, education, information, environmental degradation, and transportation, many hinge on the abundance of cheap energy.

To summarize, most people believe that the world is going downhill fast and there is nothing anyone can do about it. Our mind can’t easily differentiate between the improbable and the likely. The tragic result is that we have difficulty imagining things getting better, which leads to the knee jerk rejection of likely solutions. If we could make the shift from the Paradigm of Scarcity, which so many people have so much invested in, to the Paradigm of Abundance, which seems too-good-to-be-true, a positive feedback will occur, where every new innovation will speed the next.

Our future will be so bright we’ll have to wear shades. The only catch is that we have to believe.

The Emergence of LENR and it’s Predictable Effect on the Economy

To estimate how the emergence of LENR in the market place will predictable impact the US economy, it is best to study the known effects higher oil prices have.

US demand for oil arises from demand for the products that are made from it. When the price of petroleum products increases, consumers use more of their income to pay for oil-derived products, and their spending on other goods and services decline.

Every penny of increase in gas prices takes one billion dollars out of the U.S. economy. So when the price of gas goes up $1, that’s one hundred billion dollars sucked out of the U.S. economy, or about $1000 a year out of the typical American household.

Furthermore, oil is necessary for the production of a wide range of goods and services, because it is used for transportation in businesses of all types. Higher oil prices can cause worker layoffs and idling of plants if the cost increases can’t be passed onto the consumers, or cost increases cause consumer demand to slack.

Finally, higher oil prices cause increases in other energy prices.

Currently, LENR energy technology is little known and the market does not seriously expect it to be commercialized soon. That perception will change, (arguably) starting with the first independent confirmations of Defkalion LENR technology, continuing to grow with the first LENR generators introduced to the market, and finally reaching a fever pitch as the mass media bombards the public with analysis of future LENR applications, fueled by the sky high cost of oil.

According to Defkalion, 18 factories have been sold, and when each one is built it will produce 300,000 LENR generators per year. According to Rossi, construction of his first factory will begin in February, and will eventually produce a million LENR generators a year. Presumably the blue prints for this heavily automated plant will be cloned repeatedly thereafter. Such rapid expansion will very likely result in a public relations storm, and consequential market reaction.

There will be no immediate significant decrease in fossil fuel usage due to the commercialization of LENR, but there will predictably be a dramatic psychological impact. Investors will see the medium and long-term implications of significantly lower energy prices, and consequentially lower the assessed value of soon-to-be obsolete energy infrastructure, conventional energy companies, and long-term contracts for their relatively expensive product.

Furthermore, as the creative destruction of our current conventional energy infrastructure proceeds, more resources will be devoted to new and better ways to exploit the LENR exothermic reaction. As more and more LENR generators come on line, the trend will drive down the price of energy in the future’s market.

When the price of energy decreases, consumers will use less of their income to pay for energy-derived products, and their spending on other goods and services will predictably increase.
Furthermore, since energy is necessary for the production of a wide range of goods and services, lower energy prices will predictably cause the hiring of more workers and the expansion of plants because the cost decreases won’t always be passed onto the consumers, or cost decreases will lead consumer demand to increase.

To summarize, in my opinion the best way to estimate how the emergence of LENR onto the market place will effect our economy is to look at the know effects of higher oil prices. Take for instance the current spike in oil prices: just when companies have finally stepped up hiring, rising oil prices are threatening to halt the U.S. economy’s gains. On the other hand, LENR will predictably lower energy prices, amplifying U.S. economic gains.

Cheaper products, more jobs, more money to spend – WOW! The positive feedback effects could mean geometric economic expansion. The future will be so bright, we’ll have to wear shades!