Publication of a further, 3rd, International Patent Application by Francisco Piantelli – Part I

The following is a further posting in a series of articles by David French, a patent attorney with 35 years experience, which will review patents of interest touching on the field of Cold Fusion.

This will be a two-part outline of a recently published patent application originating from Francesco Piantelli. The first part will address the content of the disclosure of the application. The second part to follow shortly will address the scope of patent coverage apparently being sought.

The two prior Piantelli PCT applications

A third International Patent Application has been published naming Francisco Piantelli as an inventor. The first occurred in 1995 as International Application PCT/IT95/00008 entitled: Energy Generation and Generator by Means of Anharmonic Stimulated Fusion, filed August 3, 1995. This application was assigned to Francesco Piantelli, Sergio Focardi and Roberto Habel. The application addressed the fusion of hydrogen and deuterium absorbed on a metallic core that has been heated to above the Debye temperature for the core. The reaction in this disclosure is initiated by vibration and maintained by “a coherent multimodal system of stationary oscillations.” The 1995 International Application was eventually abandoned without issuing to a patent.

Notwithstanding the abandonment of this filing, these three individuals, or at least Piantelli and Focardi, should probably be credited with having pioneered research into nickel-hydrogen systems as a source of LENR effects.

A second application appeared in the Patent Cooperation Treaty system – PCT in 2010. This second application was addressed in an earlier posting of ColdFusionNow. The corresponding Canadian national entry filing to this PCT filing is available here.

The present, third, Piantelli PCT application

This present ColdFusionNow posting addresses the third International Application PCT/IB2012/052100 naming Piantelli as the sole inventor and published under the PCT on November 1, 2012 PCT. Key data on this filing obtained from the World Intellectual Property Organization – WIPO PCT website is as follows:

International Application No.: PCT/IB2012/052100
Inventor: Francesco PIANTELLI
Assignees: Silvia PIANTELLI, Alessandro MEIARINI, Leonardo CIAMPOLI, and Fabio CHELLINI, all of Italy.
Title: Method and apparatus for generating energy by nuclear reactions of hydrogen adsorbed by orbital capture on a nanocrystalline structure of a metal
PCT filing date: April 26, 2012
Original Italian priority filing date: April 26, 2011
International classification : G21B3 – physics, nuclear physics/nuclear engineering, fusion reactors, low-temperature nuclear fusion reactors, e.g. alleged cold fusion reactors

Summary of the disclosure: Power is generated by contacting hydrogen with the surface of cluster-nanostructures, e.g. crystals, of a transition metal, at a determined process temperature, by which the following process occurs. An orbital capture reaction of negative hydrogen ions, H- ions, is effected by the clusters followed by a nuclear capture reaction by the atoms of the cluster which is triggered by impulsively acting on the primary material to generate heat (Q1). A secondary material such as Lithium and/or Boron and/or a transition metal such as 232Th, 236U, 239U, 239Pu is positioned within a predetermined distance from the clusters of the primary material facing the primary material. This secondary material interacts with energetic protons that are emitted by/from the primary material and release secondary reaction heat (Q2). This secondary heat is in addition to the primary reaction heat. The heat produced is regulated by adjusting the separation of secondary material from the primary material. (This summary is a paraphrasing of the Abstract accompanying the application.)

The drawings as published in association with this application may be found at the PCT website . While the text of the words of the patent disclosure are available through a hyperlink on the top of the primary PCT page through the link labeled “Description”, in order to see the drawings it is necessary to first link to “Documents” and then link to “Initial Publication with ISR” in order to view all of the Figures. It may be necessary to choose the “download” version in order to view the PDF document.

The actual process occurring by which heat is generated is described more fully in the disclosure accompanying the application and referenced as “Description”. It involves:

– on average there must be at least 109 clusters/crystals per square centimeter of surface
– hydrogen, interstitially adsorbed at the grain boundaries and microfractures of the clusters, are of no importance for the purposes of orbital capture of negative hydrogen ions
– in the course of hydrogen capture, the negative hydrogen ions are transformed into protons
– nucleus capture of a proton causes transmutation, e.g. nickel transmutes into copper
– protons which fail to be captured are expelled with an energy of 6.7 million electron volts, verified by cloud chamber experiments
– subsequent atomically re-emitted protons can react with the adjacent secondary material, e.g. lithium, to produce nuclear transformations, e.g. converting lithium into beryllium and/or releasing helium as alpha particles having energies on the order of 4 – 17 million electron volts
– re-emitted protons can also react with boron to produce beryllium, carbon and/or helium, releasing energy on the order of 1-16 million electron volts
– alpha particles may react with boron to produce nitrogen and 19 million electron volts of energy
– alpha particles may react with nickel to be transmuted into the zinc, releasing 3-5 million electron volts of energy
– the secondary nuclear reactions arising from re-emitted protons can generally double the amount of heat being produced over that arising from the initial proton capture
– the amount of energy arising from the secondary nuclear reaction can be varied/controlled by adjusting the separation gap between the primary and secondary materials

This Description is well worth reading.

It is to be appreciated that these are assertions that have been made by the applicants in this application and do not necessarily reflect what is actually able to occur in the host material. If the assertions of utility are untrue or the procedures for generating energy are insufficiently described, then no valid patent can issue from this application.

For example, the setup as described does not appear to be critically dependent on the degree of hydrogen loading in the primary transition metal. The closest reference appears to be: “The primary reactions, both internal and external, globally occur generating a primary reaction heat, which is the heat that can be obtained according to the method described in WO2010058288,” This is a reference to the second PCT application published in 2010. The procedures of that application are adopted by reference, which is permitted. That application addresses the hydrogen loading ratio in the following terms: “Advantageously, the concentration of H- ions with respect to the transition metal atoms of said clusters is larger than 0,01 , to improve the efficiency of the energy production process. In particular, this concentration is larger than 0,08.” Accordingly, neither of these two references teach the use of a metal substrate which has a substantial hydrogen loading ratio, e.g. on the order of 0.7:1 or higher, as an essential condition for an LENR event to occur.

Additionally, there is no discussion of the effect of the conduction band within the transition metal which forms the clusters. There are a number of clear questions of physics to consider when reviewing this disclosure.

This concludes Part I. Part II will address the scope of patent coverage that this application aspires to achieve.

Cold Fusion Now Stats November

UNIVERSITIES

 

At Cold Fusion Now, we believe that new energy information is best distributed far and wide. Our readership, and the readership of all cold fusion LENR information media, is growing worldwide. More and more people are learning of this important technology. We hope when it goes mainstream… many will already be aware.

To continue our tradition of actively spreading the news, this letter with links was sent as a message to the facebook sights of the following universities over the Veterans Day Weekend. The list is of universities whose facebook page allows a message to be sent to the administrator. No posting was made directly to the wall, we invite them to do so.

Hi,

Here are a couple of links to a technology that is advancing from the cutting edge research phase to the research and engineering phase.

Study the present day state of the art of this science and you may find yourself wanting to create a post for your readers to follow.

With warm regards and electrifying anticipation,

Cold Fusion Now Org

“Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, the Realism and the Outlook” by Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center
http://futureinnovation.larc.nasa.gov/view/articles/futurism/bushnell/low-energy-nuclear-reactions.html

“Is Commercial LENR the Real Deal?”
http://www.lenrproof.com/

  1. Alabama State University
  2. Al-Azhar University
  3. Aleppo University
  4. Amity University
  5. Appalachian State University
  6. Arizona State University
  7. Ashanna Solaris
  8. Assumption University of Thailand
  9. Ateneo de Manila University
  10. Atmel University Program
  11. AUC The American University in Cairo
  12. Bahria University
  13. Baliwan University
  14. Ball So Hard University
  15. Barry University
  16. Beyoglu / Taksim, Istanbul
  17. Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University
  18. BYU (Brigham Young University)
  19. Cairo University جامعه القاهرة
  20. California State University, Fullerton
  21. Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar
  22. Central Michigan University Alumni Association
  23. Chix University XD
  24. Chulalongkorn University
  25. Cornell University
  26. Coventry University
  27. Cute University
  28. DeVry University
  29. Duke University
  30. Edinburgh Napier University
  31. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
  32. EMO University
  33. European University Cyprus
  34. Far Eastern University
  35. FB University
  36. Galgotias University
  37. George Mason University
  38. Georgia State University
  39. Grand Canyon University
  40. Graphic Era University DehraDun
  41. Gulf Medical University, Ajman
  42. Hajvery University
  43. Harvard University
  44. Heliopolis University For Sustainable Development
  45. I Love NED University
  46. Indiana University
  47. Iqra University – IU
  48. Islamic Online University
  49. K.L.H. University
  50. Kasetsart University
  51. Kennedy University
  52. Liberty University
  53. London Metropolitan University – India
  54. Lovely Professional University
  55. Mahatma Gandhi University
  56. Mansoura University – جامعة المنصورة
  57. Marquette University
  58. Mathare University of Insane Creativity
  59. Mbare University of the Wise
  60. Mississippi State University
  61. Monash University
  62. MVN University
  63. National University College Online
  64. National University of Singapore
  65. North Carolina State University
  66. Northwest Missouri State University
  67. October 6th University جامعة 6 اكتوبر
  68. Open University Malaysia
  69. Oregon State University
  70. Our Lady of Fatima University
  71. Oxford Brookes University
  72. Oxford University
  73. Oxford University Press – ELT
  74. Perdana College / UCSI University
  75. Pharos University In Alexandria
  76. Polytechnic University of the Philippines
  77. Polytechnic University of the Philippines
  78. Princeton University
  79. Purdue University
  80. Qarshi University
  81. Rack City University
  82. Rangsit University,Thailand
  83. Roger Williams University
  84. San Diego State University
  85. San Francisco State University
  86. San Jose State University
  87. Sex University
  88. Sharda University
  89. Sikkim Manipal University
  90. Silpakorn University
  91. Single’s University
  92. South University
  93. Strayer University
  94. Superior University
  95. Syracuse University
  96. Taylor Gang University
  97. Texas A&M University
  98. Texas Tech University
  99. The American University of Iraq
  100. The Open University
  101. The University of Alabama
  102. The University of Arizona
  103. The University of Chicago
  104. The University of Glasgow
  105. The University of Kansas
  106. The University of Kentucky Wildcats
  107. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  108. The University of Oklahoma
  109. The University Of Swag
  110. Thompson Rivers University – TRU World
  111. University Directory
  112. University of Cambridge
  113. University of Central Florida
  114. University Of Central Punjab
  115. University of Colorado Boulder
  116. University of Florida
  117. University of Georgia
  118. University of Hawaii, School of Architecture
  119. University of Iowa
  120. University of Jordan
  121. University of Karachi
  122. University Of Lahore
  123. University of Louisiana at Lafayette
  124. University of Malaya
  125. University of Miami
  126. University of Michigan
  127. University of Minnesota
  128. University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  129. University of North Texas
  130. University of One Directionism
  131. University of Oregon
  132. University of Oregon Ducks
  133. University of Oxford
  134. University of Phoenix
  135. University of South Florida
  136. University of Southern California
  137. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  138. University of the People
  139. University of the Philippines
  140. University of Toronto
  141. University of Washington
  142. University of Wisconsin-Madison
  143. UNSW (The University of New South Wales)
  144. VanHolland University-Training Center-Egypt Office
  145. Vels University
  146. Victor Lee Lewis
  147. Virginia Commonwealth University
  148. VIT University
  149. Walden University
  150. Webster University Thailand
  151. Webster University Vienna
  152. Wind Virtual University
  153. Yale University
  154. Yarmouk University | جامعة اليرموك
  155. جامعة الثورة | University Of Revolution

 

NEWS and GROUPS

Due to the importance of energy to the U.S. Armed Forces and the worldwide struggle for energy  supply  and it’s effect on “Energizing the Warfighter” (see DoD) (which measures the cost of oil not in dollars but cost in blood of our military);  more effort was expended on this outreach during the Veterans Day Weekend. Please read the article “Economics of Cold Fusion LENR Power Department of Defense” (link)

One of these three letters was sent to each of the following News Agencies and Activist Organizations:

——————————————————————————————————————————-

Hi,

Please include low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) technology as part of your political discourse on energy.

The NASA Series

“Real Popular Cold Fusion”
https://coldfusionnow.org/real-popular-cold-fusion/
“Cold Fusion NASA LENR – Future”
https://coldfusionnow.org/cold-fusion-nasa-lenr-future/
“Cold Fusion NASA LENR – part two Flight”
https://coldfusionnow.org/cold-fusion-nasa-lenr-part-two-flight/
“Cold Fusion NASA LENR – part three Spacebound and Earthbound Transportation”
https://coldfusionnow.org/nasa-cold-fusion-lenr-part-three-spacebound-and-earthbound-transportation/

Thank You,

Cold Fusion Now Org

———————————————————————————————————————————

Hi,

If you are not up on the science of cold fusion LENR – Low Energy Nuclear Reaction; I’m hoping you enjoy studying this. Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist of NASA Langley, states this is the solution to global warming.

The NASA series has a link to his paper. This should be part of any discourse on clean air, energy, and environment.

“Global Warming Climate Change and Cold Fusion LENR Power”

https://coldfusionnow.org/global-warming-climate-change-and-cold-fusion-lenr-power/

Thank you,

Cold Fusion Now

_________________________________________________________________________________

Hi,

This is a news tip for you about a Cold Fusion LENR Powered Boeing 747 being developed by NASA.

May 2012 NASA Contract NNL08AA16B – NNL11AA00T – “Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research – Phase II”
N+4 Advanced Concept Development

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20120009038_2012008934.pdf

“Even though we do not know the specific cost of the LENR itself, we assumed a cost of jet fuel at $4/gallon and weight based aircraft cost. We were able to calculate cost per mile for the LENR equipped aircraft compared to a conventional aircraft (Figure 3.2). Looking at the plots, one could select a point where the projected cost per mile is 33% less than a conventionally powered aircraft.”

3.0 LENR Requirements Analysis …pg 24
Figure 3.1 – Potential Heat Engines for LENR Systems ..pg 25
Figure 3.2 – Parametric LENR and Heat Engine Performance Parameters ……………….pg 25
6.2.3 Low Energy Nuclear Reactor Technologies ……pg 82
Table 6.3 – LENR Technologies Success Criteria …….pg 86
Also pgs 15, 18, 19, 20, and 21.

These are the 39 folks who have been involved in this since May, 2011

Bradley, Marty (Boeing)
Daggett, David (Boeing)
Droney, Christopher(Boeing)
Hoisington, Zachary (Boeing)
Kirby, Michelle (GT)
Murrow, Kurt (GE)
Ran, Hongjun (GT)
Nam, Teawoo (GT)
Tai, Jimmy (GT)
Hammel, Jeff (GE)
Perullo, Chris (GT)
Guynn, Mark (NASA)
Olson, Erik (NASA)
Leavitt, Larry (NASA)
Allen, Timothy (Boeing)
Cotes, Dwaine (Boeing)
Guo, Yueping (Boeing)
Foist, Brian (Boeing)
Rawdon, Blaine (Boeing)
Wakayama, Sean (Boeing)
Dallara, Emily (Boeing)
Kowalski, Ed (Boeing)
Wat, Joe (Boeing)
Robbana, Ismail (Boeing)
Barmichev, Sergey (Boeing)
Fink, Larry (Boeing)
Sankrithi, Mithra (Boeing)
White, Edward (Boeing)
Gowda, Srini (GE)
Brown, Gerald (NASA)
Wahls, Richard (NASA)
Wells, Doug (NASA)
Jeffries, Rhett (FAA)
Felder, James (NASA)
Schetz, Joe (VT)
Burley, Casey (NASA)
Sequiera, Christopher (FAA)
Martin, John (NASA)
Kapania, Rakesh (VT)

Maybe you could interview a few of these guys… see what they have to say about the emerging LENR technology (popularly known as cold fusion). “Real Popular Cold Fusion” https://coldfusionnow.org/real-popular-cold-fusion/

Thank you,

Cold Fusion Now Org

__________________________________________________________________________

  1. 7 Day News Journal
  2. 9 News
  3. ABC News
  4. ABP News
  5. ALAHLY NEWS
  6. Alfetna News
  7. Almadenah News
  8. Alrai Newspaper
  9. American Free Enterprise
  10. Asianet News
  11. BBC News
  12. Bloomberg News
  13. Bollywood News
  14. Breaking News
  15. CBS News
  16. CERES Environment Park
  17. Dap_News_Website
  18. Dawn News
  19. Eco Era America
  20. Eco-structure Magazine
  21. Environment
  22. Environment
  23. Environment Agency
  24. Environment California
  25. Environment Canada
  26. Environmental Action
  27. Environmental Defence Canada
  28. Environmental Defense Fund
  29. Environmental Graffiti
  30. Environmental Health News
  31. Environmental Science & Policy at Taylor & Francis
  32. Environmental Working Group
  33. Environmentally Smarter
  34. Equine News Today
  35. Express News
  36. Express News
  37. Faking News
  38. Football News
  39. Foot’s Forecast | United States
  40. Forward
  41. Freaking News Pictures
  42. Gaming News Daily
  43. Geo News Urdu
  44. GMA News
  45. Indigenous Environmental Network
  46. Jannat News
  47. Jews News
  48. KSDK NewsChannel 5
  49. LFC NEWS
  50. Milky Way Scientists
  51. MotorSports News
  52. MTV
  53. MTV News
  54. Myanmar News Now
  55. NBC News Business
  56. NBC News US
  57. News
  58. News • Music • Fun • Kora
  59. News Butterfly
  60. News Live-أخبار مباشر
  61. News Media Network
  62. News Room | غرفة الأخبار
  63. News Update
  64. News.Architecture.SK
  65. News.Ge
  66. Newsarama
  67. Newsbeast
  68. NewsBusters.org
  69. Newsquod
  70. Newsweek Pakistan
  71. Odd News on Yahoo! News
  72. P.N.N | News
  73. Pew Environment Group
  74. Progressive
  75. RNN | News
  76. Save Environment
  77. Shorouk News
  78. Sky News Arabia
  79. Space.com
  80. Syria News
  81. Taekwondo News
  82. The Environmental Blog
  83. The Everlasting GOP Stoppers
  84. The Free World Charter
The NASA Series
  85. The Rachel Maddow Show
  86. The Realist
Thought
  87. This is NPR
  88. Untold News
  89. USAction
  90. USGBC – National Capital Region
  91. Vanguard News
  92. World News with Diane Sawyer
  93. WWE News – اخبار مصارعة المحترفين
  94. Yahoo! News UK & Ireland
  95. Yale Environment 360
  96. Yengo News

 

11-14 UPDATE

The pain over our continuing struggle for energy… I feel it. The destruction from our present process… utilization… and use of energy… will be ending soon.

Helping to usher it in, the tradition continues of sending new energy information to groups of concerned citizens.

The following message was sent to site administrators of the following facebook groups. No posting was made to the wall.

We invite them to do so.

Hi,

Here are a couple of links to a technology that is advancing from the cutting edge research phase to the research and engineering phase.

Study the present day state of the art of this science and you may find yourself wanting to create a post for your readers to follow.

With warm regards and electrifying anticipation,

Cold Fusion Now Org

“Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, the Realism and the Outlook”
by Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center
http://futureinnovation.larc.nasa.gov/view/articles/futurism/bushnell/low-energy-nuclear-reactions.html

“Is Commercial LENR the Real Deal?”
http://www.lenrproof.com/

NASA states the energy of LENR power is the solution to global warming.
Halt oil production.
This article has info.
“Global Warming Climate Change and Cold Fusion LENR Power”
https://coldfusionnow.org/global-warming-climate-change-and-cold-fusion-lenr-power/

Thank you for the loving work you do… we LOVE you.
Prose as a gift… use when you like.

Discovery

It’s of great use to wonder…
Why our minds wander

In awe of it all

Being forever true
Seeking the new

We are just now discovering
That which has always been

Impatiently awaiting us

Craving our keen attention

Hoping for deeper understanding

Awesome is
The wonder of discovery

And the power
Of awe

poemgbgoble2009

cold fusion now org

gbgoble g mail .com…

———————————————————————————————

  1. A Tar Sands Referendum
  2. Against Keystone XL Pipeline
  3. Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation – Case against the Tar Sands
  4. Before It Starts.org – Keep Tar Sands and Oil Shale Mining Out of the USA
  5. Build the Keystone Pipeline
  6. Canadian Tar Sands = Unethical Oil
  7. Can-Am Against The Keystone XL Pipeline
  8. Cascadia Tar Sands Action
  9. Coalition Against Keystone XL Pipeline
  10. Darryl Hannah Opposes Keystone Pipeline
  11. Demand for a National Referendum on Closing the Tar Sands
  12. Denton Supports Tar Sands Blockade
  13. Denver Tar Sands Action
  14. Draw the Line at TarSands
  15. EI Tar Sands
  16. Ending Investment in Tar Sands
  17. Keystone Pipeline Protest
  18. Keystone XL pipeline – Tarsands – SAY NO
  19. Kill the Keystone Pipeline
  20. Madison Tar Sands Action Group
  21. My Tar Sands Duck Dinner with Andrea
  22. No Tar Sands
  23. No Tar Sands Caravan
  24. No Tar Sands Caravan from CA to DC
  25. No Tar Sands in Maine
  26. NO to the Pipelines! NO to the TAR Sands
  27. Occupy Keystone XL Pipeline Route
  28. Ottawa Tar Sands Action/Action Halte aux sables bitunimeux à Ottawa
  29. President Obama “vote NO” on the Keystone XL Pipeline
  30. Say NO To The Keystone Pipeline
  31. Stop Alberta Oil Sands Growth
  32. Stop Filming Hobbit in Tar Sands
  33. Stop Northern Gateway
  34. Stop Suncor and Tar Sands
  35. Stop The Alberta Tar Sands – Global
  36. Stop The Flow! End Tar Sands Transport in the Trans Mountain Pipeline
  37. STOP the Keystone Pipeline
  38. Stop the Keystone XL Pipeline PDX
  39. Stop the Keystone XL Pipeline, No More Dirty Tar Sands Oil
  40. Stop the Mining in the Alberta Tar Sands
  41. Stop the Tar Sands KW
  42. STOP The Tar Sands Oil Keystone XL PIPELINE
  43. STOP TransCanada’s Keystone XL Oil Pipeline Project in our (USA) Soil
  44. Students Against the Keystone Pipeline
  45. Support the Keystone XL Pipeline
  46. Tar Sand Betties Roller Derby League
  47. Tar Sands
  48. Tar Sands
  49. Tar Sands Action
  50. Tar Sands Action – Southern California
  51. Tar Sands Action ~ Stop Keystone XL Pipeline
  52. Tar Sands Action- Maine
  53. Tar Sands Action Seattle
  54. Tar Sands Activists
  55. Tar Sands Blockade
  56. Tar Sands Blockade – Houston
  57. Tar Sands Day
  58. Tar Sands Free
  59. Tar Sands Free Arizona
  60. Tar Sands Free Northeast
  61. Tar Sands of $hell Are Tar Sands of Hell
  62. Tar Sands Oil Horrors
  63. Tar Sands Song
  64. Tar Sands Students
  65. Tar Sands: Alberta, Canada
  66. Tar Sands: The Inherent Dangers
  67. Texans Against Tar Sands
  68. Texas Tar Sands Truth Teller
  69. The Anti-Keystone XL Pipeline
  70. The Beaver Lake Cree vs Tar Sands
  71. The Tar Sands
  72. Utah Tar Sands Resistance

 

ANALYSIS

An analysis of the effect on stats will follow in an addendum to this article. An Anomalous Spike is expected.

A Fork in the Road to Replication

When you come to a fork in the road, take it! Yogi Berra

Being able to replicate a scientific discovery is one of the mainstays of the scientific method. Difficulty in replicating the Fleischmann and Pons experiment in 1989 has given rise to the widely held myth that cold fusion in fact has never been replicated. Of course this is not true. The number of documented replications runs in the thousands.  Yet, even a number in the 1000s is small in the grand scheme of things. The reasons for this are myriad, including the lack of a clear theoretical understanding of the phenomenon, poor funding, the complicated nature of the calorimetry setup, etc. Aside from those things, there is often the desire to keep important parts of replication process out of the public domain because of lack of patent protection. Because cold fusion has been forced to fly commercial because of a lack of access to funding and support through traditional scientific channels, the technology is being developed under a different model than most scientific discoveries of this significance. Cold fusion is now being developed like a business, including reluctance to share information to potential competitors and closely guarded trade secrets and, concomitantly, absolutely no obligation to the public at large to share findings or methods.

However, things have begun to change in this regard with the emergence of Francesco Celani’s cold fusion wires, and the continuing development of the Athanor/Hydrobetatron of Ugo Abundo and his students and colleagues at the Pirelli High School in Rome.  Although these cells may never prove to be commercially viable, both may provide a replication pathway that serves to provide answers as to how and why, and subsequently disseminate that knowledge widely. When this happens, widespread replication can truly begin.

The recent 8-page article in Popular Science may serve to plant the seed of interest in the general public.  While the article did not endorse the technology per se, it did lend it a sense of credibility that has been sorely lacking for 2 decades.  Popular Science has been a publication read by the educated layman since its inception in 1873.  The importance of establishing some degree of credibility with that demographic cannot be understated.  It was this demographic that brought us the personal computer.  It was after reading an article in a similar publication, Popular Electronics, in 1975 about the Altair 8800, that set Bill Gates out to start a company that would eventually become Microsoft. In addition, the co-founders of both Microsoft and Apple (Gates/Allen & Job/Wozniak) were members of Homebrew Computer Clubs, which were bands of computer hobbyists and enthusiasts who met regularly to exchange information, parts and ideas. In essence, Homebrew Clubs were an early form of crowdsourcing, wherein small groups of technically savvy people worked independently, but in a collaborative fashion, to solve problems and overcome technical difficulties as related to early manifestations of the PC.

Altair 8800

With the recent release of the “The Believers” and several balanced articles in mainstream magazines including Popular Science (Scientific American notwithstanding), the seeds of credible interest are being sewn to a wider audience. As more people become aware that there is something to cold fusion, interest will surely grow and the desire to replicate will surely follow. We saw a wave of replication efforts of the e-Cat last year as word of Rossi spread across the web.  However, these efforts were mostly shots in the dark because Rossi provided so few details. The next wave of replication attempts will be among people with much more information, as both Abundo and Celani have made a concerted effort to provide a great deal of detail with the precise goal of enabling widespread replication.

The Martin Fleishmann Memorial Project is currently sponsoring three groups attempting to replicate the Celani cell. The slide show below outlines the rationale and plan for sponsoring replications.

 

The three groups enlisted in this replication effort so far are working separately but will be collaborating, sharing information and discussing technical issues. These are the seeds of cold fusion crowdsourcing.  In the video below, a member of the EU replication team receives a shipment prepared by another team, the Hunt Utilities Group.  The shipment includes all the necessary equipment to set up a replication, including the cell itself and a PC with custom software to monitor experimental results. Per the video description:

“This is a trial run for when we are ready to ship second generation reactors around the globe in the event of successful internal Celani replications”.

As you watch Matthew of the EU team unbox the cold fusion kit from HUG, he looks like a youngster at Christmas opening up one of his presents.  Now imagine, if you will, hundreds, perhaps thousands, of others being able to purchase a similar setup for their own replication attempts.  Per quantumheat.org:

We will be setting up a Crowd-sourcing initiative soon.  It will be listed right here and elsewhere when we do.  The idea of a global, grass roots effort overcoming the institutional biases and bringing this to the attention of mainstream science and industry is so cool.  Of course, a visionary philanthropist who recognizes the potential of this and funds the whole historic initiative also makes a good story.”

One of the groups involved in this replication attempt is, as mentioned, the Hunt Utilities Group of Pine River, MN. This group is dedicated to fostering sustainable living, and has been involved in different alternative energy technologies for at least a decade. On the HUG site there is a section that describes how the group became interested in LENR.  Members of this group became aware of Rossi in January of 2011 and have been following the developments regarding the e-Cat ever since.  Eventually, it became obvious that something very real and significant was happening and members of HUG decided to transition from watching on the sidelines to active participation.

“So, we started studying, built a safety lab to handle hydrogen and nano-powder safely, built a clean room (relative to the rest of the shop) and started gathering and building test equipment.  The fun part is that the learning curve is so steep, we need mountain climbing gear. Our shop staff quickly evolved from a loose bunch of individuals into a focused team. We feel lucky. We also feel a sense of destiny that we happen to have the right team with the right tools at the right time.

Furthermore, the Hunt Utilities Group embraces the collaborative, crowdsourcing model:

HUG envisions a unique approach to collaboration in the LENR field that would ideally catalyze progress for the encumbered information sharing process. With open information sharing via crowdsourced blogging, ideas can be traded quickly without delay. Live data could be posted for review, criticisms, interpretation, and suggestions from peers and collaborators. At the expense of immediate intellectual property rights, the accelerating benefits could prove an invaluable asset leading to certified patents.”   Source.

To help those attempting to replicate Celani, Earthtech.org of Austin, TX (home of NI), has set up a cold fusion device verification service.  Per a recent comment on E-Cat World, the service works thusly:

“Harold Puthoff, the CEO, would pass the making of the Celani device to Scott Little, for lab replication and testing, if asked, and have the costs absorbed by the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin.

Any cold fusion device that passes their testing would be immediately recognized world-wide as “officially” verified.”

In addition to the replication of Celani, replication attempts of the Athanor/Hydrobetatron cell of Ugo Abundo of the Pirelli High School in Rome have spread to North America. There is now a replication attempt of that cell being undertaken at the Gladstone Secondary School, in Vancouver, British Columbia.  This is of course the same city where Defkalion Green Technologies is making its new home.

In a comment posted a couple of weeks ago on the Defkalion Forum, a user with the screen name “HappyRocker,” announced the school’s involvement in an Athanor replication attempt.  A member of the faculty of that school posted a comment on the DGT Forum and requested a visit to the new Defkalion offices in Vancouver. Short of that, this commenter requested a visit by a Defkalion representative to the school to explain the basics and/or lend a hand with the calorimetry setup of their replication attempt. It should be noted, aside from any support from Defkalion with issues regarding calorimetry, the Vancouver school has enlisted the services of an expert in calorimetry from Vancouver’s Simon Fraser University to assist them with this important aspect of the experiment.

Since the original posting, more details have emerged about this work. The school has named their project the EC2, or EC squared (short for electro-chemistry electron capture). They have setup a project blog for students involved with the work, which can be viewed here. In the future they also plan to set up a fundraising effort through Kickerstarter.com, and they hope to sell coffee mugs, T-shirts and quite possibly even replication kits. Preliminary testing in regards to the EC2 project is to begin very shortly.

Gladstone Secondary School – Vancouver, BC

I think the promise of widespread, crowdsourced replications of some cold fusion cell were summarized recently by Jed Rothwell on Vortex-l.  His comments were primarily in regards to the Celani cell but the same could be said of the Athanor, or any other potential cold fusion replication kit meant for a more general audience.

We can hope that the Celani device, replicated by 5 or 10 labs, will convince hundreds more researchers than we now have.

Many of them will replicate, triggering thousands more.  Once you get up to a million people who believe it, money starts pouring in, and thousands get to work frantically developing the technology.

At that point it does not matter how many people still do not believe the technology is real.

November Update from Andrea Rossi

In the past week the latest news with Leonardo Corporation/Andrea Rossi has been centered around the brief announcement of a February 2013 1 MW plant going into operation in the U.S. with public viewing after it operates for a certain time period.

“Yes, Leonardo Corp is very much powerful now. I can already say that the first 1 MW hot cat will go in operation within February 2013. It will not be a military application, therefore selected persons will be allowed to visit it. It will be installed in a big power production and distribution plant. This is the new. The plant is made in the USA. An extremely important agreement has been signed after the tests of the Hot Cat, which are going on since June in the USA and in Italy. The details will be communicated only after the plant will have been working for enough time to be visitable, also to avoid clubs in the wheels. That’s all I can say right now.”

Today this news is elaborated on a bit more in Andrea Rossi’s Journal, in which he also touches on the announced deadlines which he repeatedly makes and the expected delays which occur.

The first update a week ago stressed the plant was non-military related, and today he mentions “a major world holding” is behind the agreement.

We also hear the announcement of a projected public 1 MW plant viewing around May/June 2013, a month or so before the big ICCF 18 conference taking place this time around in the US, making for a lot of revision and last minute speech editing if everything goes as scheduled time wise, and the plant is operational and viewable to the selected public (i.e. likely many attending the conference).

Anyway, this is just an update on the projected plans which Rossi has announced. Many have become impatient, and perhaps more skeptical with the recent print media mainstream exposure. The usual knee jerk responses are expected, but feel free to give thoughts and discussion, if any, in the comment section.

Rossi’s comments today came in response to one of the, as mentioned, everyday impatient readers, who posted the following remark:

Marco Serra
November 8th, 2012 at 10:03 AM

“Dear Ing. Rossi,
I read your Journal every day for more than a year now to monitor the advances of your wonderfull discovery. You make us followers sometime enthusiastic but often impatient with your (understandable) reserve in showing what’s happening in your secret lab.
At the time of Pordenone, few weeks ago, you stated that you got the HotCat under full control but it was just a “free” device, that is, without any loading (water to be heated). Then you said that “Tesla dream is close”. And now … BOOOOOM ….. the first 1MW HotCat will be ready in 3 months, and it will be used by a third party in a power plant.
Please tell me what the HotCat will do in the power plant, I mean what its role will be ?
Will it produce electricity or pre-heated fluid ?
If yes will it use a turbine or an unusual heat-electricity converter ?
And, the most important question, does HotCat still need external energy or you get it to self produce its needed energy ?

Please Ing. Rossi don’t answer that these info are confidential. I did not ask anything about the inner behaviour of the HotCat.
I’M and WE ARE SIMPLY SOOOOOO IMPATIENTS…

Best Regards
Marco”

Andrea Rossi’s reply:


Andrea Rossi
November 8th, 2012 at 12:30 PM

“Dear Marco:
I appreciate wholeheartedly the enthusiasm of our supporters, but sometime I have the impression that the difficulties we are fighting against are strongly underevaluated, just like to make a LENR industrial apparatus should be a normal thing. If I say that we will make a thing betwen October and November, this does not mean October 1st, could also mean Nov. 30st.

Can also happen that new difficulties raise, so a delay comes up. The NUCLEAR FUSION ( ITER and the likewise) scientists had foreseen to put their plant in operation 20 years ago. After 100 billions of (taxpayer’s) money, they today foresee that perhaps they will have a plant in operation in the next 50 years, after further hundreds of billion dollars, and the scientific context is comfortable with this. Their present target is COP 1.1; we published our work in 2009 ( see Focardi-Rossi paper on this Journal). After 3 years and few millions ( of our private company, no public funding requested, no taxpayer money spent) we are manufacturing ( completely at our risks) plants of 1 MW, one of which will go in operation within February 2013 and will be exposed to the public after a period of operation ( 2-3 months).

The plant will be put in the concern of a major world holding, which has signed with us an extremely important contract. The plant will heat a fluid. No electricity will be produced in the first plant, because the Customer wants to make thermal energy with the forst application,but obviously, due to the high temperature we are now able to reach, the coupling with turbines in a Carnot cycle is possible and will surely be made by the same Customer in the next plants. We still guarantee COP 6, even if the supposition that the COP can be increased is not groundless.

The self sustained mode happens for approximatively the 50% of the operational time, regulated by a new concept remotely governed control system. Well, after all this, somebody talks of infinite delays…well, allow me to say that some scientific context sometimes gives the impression not to be very scientific. We don’t bother, anyway, just work.
As you can see, the answers are not confidential.

Warm Regards,
A.R.”

Cold Fusion and Cocktails

I think the whole cold fusion community, scientists, researchers and advocates alike, were outraged by the cold fusion hit piece that was recently posted on Scientific American.  Believe me, I was as perturbed as many of the rest of you.  I had an article full of righteous indignation and anger but never posted it.  While I am still perturbed, a couple of days of reflection have allowed me to gain a bit of perspective.

Scientific American is the oldest continuously-published monthly magazine in the United States.  It has been in circulation for 167 years.  Many famous scientists, including Einstein, have contributed articles to the publication during it’s over century and half of existence.  However, its reputation has been in a slow and steady decline for the past half-century.  The decline in its once stellar reputation has been even steeper in the last decade, where its contributors have taken questionable stances on a variety of issues, including commentary on political matters like the Iraq War.  The publication also did not endear itself to anyone when it raised its college library subscription rate by 500% in 2009.  No, this is not your great grandfather’s Scientific American, any more than cold fusion is the kind of nuclear power your mother told you about.

Cold Fusion Now Bumper Sticker

It is in this environment that we find the quasi-scientific blog of Jennifer Ouellette’s, Cocktail Party Physics.  That name alone should tell us that this is not really an overly serious endeavor.  The author herself admits her forte is “finding quirky connections between physics, popular culture, and the world at large.”  She has written several books in this vein, one of which extols her bravery in overcoming her fear of calculus.  On the other hand, most serious about science overcome their fear of calculus by the time they graduate high school. Cold Fusion Now’s own Ruby Carat would think it immodest to call herself a serious scientist but has an academic background in physics and a graduate degree in mathematics.  She obviously overcame any “fear of calculus” many moons ago and didn’t think it was such a big deal that she had to write a book about it.   If Ouellette is gracious enough to accept Ruby’s invitation for a chat about her article over cocktails, I hope it is live streamed over the Internet.  That is one conversation I would like to be privy to.

Yet, Jennifer’s approach to science and its relation to the world at large would have made her a perfect candidate to give us a review of  “The Believers.”  It would have been right up her alley.  Instead, when someone mentioned the film to her, she inexplicably choose to write a 3000 word article espousing every myth and sophomoric joke about cold fusion perpetuated for the last 20 years, and never actually bothered to see the film.  A bit curious to say the least.

The question is why? What was the purpose and point of doing this as a response to the release of a film that won top honors at the Chicago Film Festival?  Well, there are some interesting theories about that.  For example, Dr. Michael McKubre suspects the article is a “concerted effort by several leading members of the opposition.” This according to comments made recently by Jed Rothwell on Vortex-l.  Some might dismiss that notion as a cock-eyed conspiracy theory but, upon further review, there might be something to that suspicion.

For example, Ouellette’s husband is Sean Carroll, a senior research associate in the Department of Physics at the California Institute of Technology, or CalTech.  Yes, that would be the same CalTech whose failed replication attempts were largely conducted before many details of the original experiments have been released (as was the case with many reported replication failures).  It was CalTech physicist Steven Koonin that infamously said that Fleishmann and Pons were “psychotic and delusional.”  Indeed, the anti-cold fusion bias runs deep at CalTech.  One can imagine that Jennifer has heard many cold fusion stories over the years from her CalTech physicist husband and his colleagues.

Steven Koonin

It should also be noted that Ouellette writes a column for a publication of the American Physical Society, the APS News, entitled “This Month in Physics History.”  In an interview on the  “The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson,” this author describes the nexus and ongoing association with the mainstream physics establishment:

I was actually a freelance writer in New York City trying to make a living , and it turns out the physicists would pay me.  It is really as simple as that.  They needed someone who could put physics concepts into plain English that would be able to appeal to a broader audience.

http://youtu.be/4J-8a2NPHUE

As any student of literature knows, many of the earliest written stories in human history where myths handed down through generations via the oral tradition practiced by story tellers.  The individual who actually put these myths to paper did not have to vouch for their accuracy or truthfulness.  That was not their role.  It seems that our “recovering English major,” Jennifer Ouellette, is playing the role of modern scribe for the myths of the mainstream physics community regarding cold fusion.  This may explain why she shut down the comment section of her blog with the quickness.  She was not able to appropriately counter the evidence provided that contradicted the 20 year old myths she strung together  in her article.  As pointed out previously, and as reiterated in the interview above, we are talking about an individual who, basic calculus aside, is “terrified of math and physics.”   Having to talk about things in ways that require critical thought and examination of all the evidence probably sends her running for her cocktail shaker or the neighborhood pub.

As the saying goes, when considering praise or criticism, consider the source.  Yes, I know, it is easier said than done.  For those who have done their research, to hear old myths repeated with ignorant certainty as scientific truths is infuriating. But we must keep in mind that if a 20 year old myth, regurgitated by a writer who is “terrified of math and physics,” is all there is to worry about, we are in pretty good shape. So, sit back, enjoy a cocktail of your own, and try not to let scientific fundamentalists and the ignorant make you see red. I have an inkling that very shortly (within months), there will be a significant LENR disclosure and those who continue to cling to tired old myths will look as foolish as the cocktail party attendee who has had one too many and ends up donning a lamp shade on their head.

Cold Fusion Now Art Curation/Contest : 1 Month Left!

Just a reminder that the Cold Fusion Now Online Art Contest/Curation deadline is now a month away.

CLICK HERE for guidelines and more info.

So far we have about half a dozen entries, with 2 prolific Outsider Artists promising to enter, and a soon to be 6 year old collaborating with her father, who says an entry is in the works.

But we definitely could use more entries. So keep em coming or get rolling on some canvas or your preferred medium, and churn out some free energy fusion inspired art to color up this joint, and a chance at the mega 100 dollar Benjamin giveaway or limited edition T-shirts (which only Rosanne Barr and a few others own.)

Let’s barrel into 2013 with fresh energy,
displayed through CF inspired art.

A counter measure of sorts as well; for the inevitable revenants in the coming year who will rise from the skeptical woodwork looking to drain energy from the CF community.

Art never fails as a viable apotropaic to ward off said revenants, driving them back to the 1990’s or better yet easing them into the current Transition.

Art for Art’s sake is the main purpose though, so, send the above or below link out to any artists you know, old or very young, established, not, or creating under a “non-artist” label, all is fine and we look forward to the works.

Thanks much.

Entries can be emailed to eli@ColdFusionNow.org

CLICK HERE for guidelines and more info about the Cold Fusion Now Art Contest.

Top