Following Developments in the LENR Marketplace

Our Curiosity is Piqued at Times

This is one of those

Moments

As I was looking into

The Object of my Curiosity

Wondering if  Others. New to this Might Be

A bit Curious about LENR Energy…   Just like Me!     PIQUED

How many people are newly following recent developments in…

What is Popularly Known as ‘Cold Fusion’ Research and Engineering?

Does the Blog-o-Sphere Eclipse Mainstream Media? Let’s search into this. 

How many People Like/Share/Link LENRgy Now?

As the science behind the LENR – low energy nuclear reaction advances

As LENR Science Engages Marketplace Engineering

 

Is News of LENR Energy Reaching the Public?

Cold Fusion may just be a misnomer. Yes indeed, it certainly is!

A popular name. A story from the past. Which we should speak of at times.

Besides All That

Who is Talking About ‘Cold Fusion’ – LENRgy – Now?

Let’s Feed Our Curiosity and Take a Look

The Statistics of a Few Recent LENR Articles as of 6/13/13

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

From ExtremeTech.com

Which is a registered trademark of Ziff Davis, Inc. 18k people have liked ExtremeTech on Facebook.

“Cold Fusion Reactor Independently Verified… Has 10,000 times the energy density of gas.”

Tests find Rossi’s E-Cat has an energy density at least 10 times higher than any conventional energy source

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-05-rossi-e-cat-energy-density-higher.html#jCp

602 Comments. Liked on Facebook 44k times Tweets  1,143 times StumbleUpon 1.5k times Google 1.2k times InShares 157

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

From Phys.Org

A leading web-based science, research and technology news service. 35,513 people follow and 88,810 have like PhysOrg.

By…     Lisa Zyga on May 23, 2013

“Tests Find Rossi’s E-Cat has an Energy Density at Least 10 Times Higher than any Conventional Energy Source”

107,259 Views 436 Comments.  Liked on Facebook 877 times Tweets 63 times StumbleUpon 68 times Google 85 times

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

From Forbes.com

Mark Gibbs, Contributor

“I cover tech news, science, and tech innovation.” 161 follow him.

“Finally! Independent Testing Of Rossi’s E-Cat Cold Fusion Device: Maybe The World Will Change After All” By Mark Gibbs on May 20.

107,259 Views – 152 comments. Shared on Facebook 6.7k times Tweets 465 times InShare 95 times Submit 151 times  Google 289 times.

Here is Another One by Mark Gibbs

“The E-Cat Testing Team, Real or Ringers?” Forbes – By Mark Gibbs on May 24.

7,326 views. 69 comments. Shared on Facebook 97 times Tweets 70 times InShare 1 times Submit 386 times  Google 3 times

And Another by Mark Gibbs

“Rossi’s A Fraud! No, He’s Not! Yes, He Is! No, He Isn’t!” Forbes – By Mark Gibbs on May 30.

9,366 views. 133 comments. Shared on Facebook 55 times Tweets 154 times InShare 23 times Google 9 times Reddit 6 times.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Let’s Look at the Links to These Forbes Articles

“Finally! Independent Testing Of Rossi’s E-Cat Cold Fusion Device”

“Maybe The World Will Change After All”

  1. http://www.overclock.net/t/1397217/forbes-finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/60
  2. http://libertycalling.net/home/categories/miscellaneous/item/890-finally-independent-testing-of-rossi-s-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all
  3. http://www.wanttoknow.info/a-finally-independent-testing-rossis-ecat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-world-will-change-after-all
  4. http://now.motherearthnews.com/story/priority2/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-ec/44335868394632693765674e6264596d6767684d46413d3d
  5. http://www.usnationpost.com/tech/519aff55e4b0a33fe9e1311a_finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-ecat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all.htm
  6. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3022044/posts
  7. http://www.i4u.com/2013/05/cold-fusion/maybe-world-device-independent-finally-rossis-cold-after-e-cat-all-fus
  8. http://doubtfulnews.com/tag/cold-fusion/
  9. http://www.scoop.it/t/lenr-revolution-in-process-cold-fusion/p/4001951175/finally-independent-testing-of-rossi-s-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all
  10. https://plus.google.com/+JohnBlossom/posts/4kuaqvVKqix
  11. http://www.alternativefuse.com/rssreader/#.UbQcXeeKIfU
  12. http://www.getthefive.com/articles/the-in-crowd/cold-fusion-could-change-the-world-again/
  13. https://www.facebook.com/Call2Change/posts/599358476748479
  14. http://inagist.com/all/337050951036846082/?utm_source=inagist&utm_medium=rss
  15. http://bd.summit.net/blog/2013/05/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/
  16. http://69.162.85.146/article/17234284/Finally!%20Independent%20Testing%20Of%20Rossi’s%20E-Cat%20Cold%20Fusion%20Device:%20Maybe%20The%20World%20Will%20Change%20After%20All
  17. http://www.physicstoday.org/daily_edition/science_and_the_media/forbescom_renews_attention_to_widely_disparaged_low-energy_nuclear_reactions
  18. https://coldfusionnow.org/discovery-news-misinforms-on-cold-fusion-again/
  19. http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2117.msg31980;topicseen
  20. http://news.silobreaker.com/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-ecat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all-5_2266834726809501780
  21. http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?p=3430299
  22. http://www.std.com/~mica/cft.html
  23. http://anakupto.blogspot.com/2013/05/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e.html
  24. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/testforum.cgi?noframes;read=277588
  25. http://100pct.us/story/top_stories/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-ec/44335868394632693765674e6264596d6767684d46413d3d
  26. https://twitter.com/quistuipater/status/336738236598730753
  27. http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/lenr-the-next-phase/
  28. http://www.gotnewswire.com/news/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-ecat-cold-fusion-device
  29. http://www.weboflove.org/inspiringnewsstories
  30. http://www.faces.co.ug/m/news_feed/view/71614121
  31. http://www.inooz.co.uk/article/view/2861494/finally!-independent-testing-of-rossi-s-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/052013
  32. http://www.e-cat.com/2013/05/forbes-mark-gibbs-on-the-e-cat-3rd-party-report/
  33. http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1517-Forbes%92-Mark-Gibbs-on-the-E-Cat-3rd-Party-Report
  34. http://donalfagan.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/excess-heat/
  35. http://aashiqui-2.xaowei.com/shows.php?q=Finally!+Independent+Testing+Of+Rossi%26%2339%3Bs+E-Cat+Cold+Fusion+Device%3A+Maybe+The+World+Will+Change+After+All
  36. http://hobbyspace.com/Blog/?p=2357
  37. http://teakdoor.com/world-news/128274-cold-fusion-almost-reality-e-cat.html
  38. http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/6720-suppression-document-youtube-9.html
  39. http://mikethemadbiologist.com/2013/05/30/links-53013/
  40. http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=237&mn=68598&pt=msg&mid=12812599
  41. http://jonwizardnews.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all-forbes/
  42. http://pesn.com/2013/05/20/9602320_VINDICATION–3rd-Party-E-Cat_Test-Results-show-at-least-10x-gain/
  43. http://digitalflame.org/Cold-Fusion
  44. http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2013/05/21/fossil-fuel-age-replaced-by-cold-fusion-less-than-a-decade-away-from-clean-energy/
  45. http://forum.hegnar.no/thread.asp?id=2179460http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/general-talk/209194-what-happens-if-cold-fusion-does-become-reality-6.html
  46. http://forums.somd.com/environment-green-living-alternative-energy/271610-lenr-third-party-confirmation.html
  47. https://delicious.com/dbaulig
  48. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread948626/pg1
  49. http://sport.topnewstoday.org/sport/article/6059012/
  50. http://alessandrosicurocomunication.wordpress.com/2013/05/25/la-fusione-fredda-italiana-funziona-ci-credono-tutti-tranne-gli-italiani-che-devono-deciderne-lutilizzo-e-lo-sfruttamento-lo-dichiarano-sempre-piu-fonti-autorevoli/
  51. http://www.usmessageboard.com/science-and-technology/294967-hot-cat-report-out-and-vindicates-rossi-s-claims.html
  52. http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2013/05/paradigm-shift.htmlhttp://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2013/05/paradigm-shift.html
  53. http://forum.weatherzone.com.au/ubbthreads.php/topics/1195555/Re_The_Alternative_Energy_Scam
  54. http://sdoppiamocupido.blogspot.com/2013/05/fusione-fredda-italiana-prime-conferme-test-indipendenti.html
  55. http://www.examiner.com/article/top-news-wsj-on-strange-9-11-phone-calls-goldman-sachs-drives-up-food-costs
  56. http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/05/general_debate_21_may_2013.html
  57. http://klokkresearch.tumblr.com/
  58. http://slopeofhope.com/2013/05/groupon-is-wall-street-paying-attention.html
  59. http://denverdirect.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-senior-director-of-bonds-and.html
  60. http://museandmaven.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/management-guru-peter-drucker-on-facts/
  61. http://www.continentalwhoswho.co/index.php/technology-and-networking/156-technology1/460-profile-skydoor-pte-ltd
  62. http://intelfaces.com/2013/05/20/ibms-watson-now-a-customer-service-agent-coming-to-smartphones-soon/
  63. http://aren.soup.io/tag/science
  64. http://www.brucetanner.info/
  65. http://lessthantwominutes.wordpress.com/tag/syria/
  66. http://www.anomalist.com/?49442d20
  67. http://techme101.com/2013/05/20/build-your-startup-on-a-vacant-domain-name/
  68. http://elivergarablog.wordpress.com/
  69. http://publiccircles.appspot.com/dailycircle/gideon_rosenblatt-writer_s_circle/2013-05-22
  70. http://slackpile.com/2013/06/07/cold-war-missile-silo-converted-to-home-on-market-for-750k/
  71. http://www.digitalpodcast.com/feeds/23299-mysterious-universe-podcast
  72. http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/-haseloff-kritisiert-roesler-cdu-ministerpraesident-fordert-energieministerium-/8270726.html
  73. http://ephemeral-thoughts.tumblr.com/
  74. http://piratica.eu/search?tag=power
  75. http://offlogic.wordpress.com/page/2/
  76. http://forum.mind-energy.net/skeptiko-podcast/5195-indication-anomalous-heat-energy-production-reactor-device-containing-hydrogen-loaded-nickel-powder.html
  77. http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2013/05/episode-920-mysterious-universe/
  78. http://denverdirect.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-senior-director-of-bonds-and.html

“The E-Cat Testing Team, Real or Ringers?”

  1. http://www.democraticunderground.com/112744965
  2. http://biznewsindex.com/news/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers-
  3. http://ewallstreeter.com/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers-3450/
  4. http://technogasm.com/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers/
  5. http://www.scoop.it/t/lenr-revolution-in-process-cold-fusion/p/4002214038/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers
  6. http://www.dailynewscrunch.com/technology/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers
  7. https://twitter.com/learnpublishing/status/338057275015049216
  8. http://www.i4u.com/2013/05/ringers-or-real-team-e-cat-testing
  9. http://www.sportballa.com/2013/05/real-team-ringers-testing-or-e-cat
  10. http://article.wn.com/view/2013/05/24/The_ECat_Testing_Team_Real_or_Ringers/#/related_news
  11. http://bd.summit.net/blog/2013/05/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers/
  12. http://business.topnewstoday.org/business/article/6108640/
  13. http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/wired-uk-covers-e-cat-cold-fusion/
  14. http://inagist.com/all/340733940962836480/
  15. http://www.rsshog.com/a/2013-05-24/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers-forbes/bCV7QRysoFmjzcEcqppmpAxv67w9omS2qa2XUI3wqCs_/
  16. http://liberalforum.org/liberalforum/index.php?/topic/148930-now-this-could-be-real-hope-for-change-lenr-news/
  17. http://www.crazyontap.com/topic.php?TopicId=301276&Posts=15
  18. http://occupywallst.org/forum/independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-de/
  19. http://phys.org/news/2013-05-rossi-e-cat-energy-density-higher.html
  20. http://uk.emailpress.net/2013/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-21-05/
  21. http://www.peaceofmindnews.com/2013/06/06/
  22. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/156393-cold-fusion-reactor-independently-verified-has-10000-times-the-energy-density-of-gas
  23. http://nickelenergy.wordpress.com/
  24. http://ecatbuilder.com/newsfeeds/
  25. http://www.bullfax.com/?q=node-cold-fusion
  26. http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?109913-Low-Energy-Nuclear-Reactions-(cold-fusion)/page93
  27. http://www.sharedividends.com.au/eal
  28. http://www.tecnopoly.cl/tech/index.html
  29. http://techandgaming247.com/the-e-cat-testing-team-real-or-ringers/

 “Rossi’s A Fraud!”

“No, He’s Not! Yes, He Is! No, He Isn’t!”

  1. http://www.scoop.it/t/lenr-revolution-in-process-cold-fusion/p/4002463249/rossi-s-a-fraud-no-he-s-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isn-t
  2. http://bd.summit.net/blog/2013/05/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/
  3. http://newssly.com/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/#.UbRdCt1xBDg
  4. http://markets.financialcontent.com/mi.centredaily/news/read/24304138/rossi’s_a_fraud!_no
  5. http://ewallstreeter.com/rossi-s-a-fraud-no-he-s-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isn-t-4163/#_/exjun_
  6. http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg81874.html Ed Storms!
  7. http://www.dailynewscrunch.com/technology/rossi-s-a-fraud-no-he-s-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isn-t/
  8. http://uk.emailpress.net/2013/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt-30-05/
  9. http://www.globalne.ws/Latest/D/4028810e3ee8734f013ef3c65926002f/Rossi’s-A-Fraud–No,-He’s-Not–Yes,-He-Is–No,-He-Isn’t-#.UbRjHN1xBDg
  10. http://business.topnewstoday.org/business/article/6176279/
  11. http://technogasm.com/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/
  12. http://www.wopular.com/rossis-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-no-he-isnt
  13. http://snciawr.newsonfeeds.com/article/17262668/Rossi’s%20A%20Fraud!%20No,%20He’s%20Not!%20Yes,%20He%20Is!%20No,%20He%20Isn’t!
  14. http://marketblok.com/2013/05/30/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/
  15. http://buzzelicious.com/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/
  16. http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/forbes-gibbs-on-e-cat-fraud-claims/
  17. http://inagist.com/all/340733940962836480/
  18. http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1560-Forbes%92-Gibbs-on-E-Cat-Fraud-Claims
  19. http://www.getthefive.com/articles/the-in-crowd/cold-fusion-could-change-the-world-again/
  20. http://www.i4u.com/2013/05/andrea-rossi-footballer/hes-fraud-yes-he-rossis-isnt-he-no-no-not
  21. http://www.hotheadlines.com.au/redirect.php?h=Rossis_A_Fraud_No_Hes_Not_Yes_He_Is_No_He_Isnt_&artid=2229009
  22. http://www.checkitdaily.com/news/articles/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt
  23. http://15minutenews.com/article.php?articleid=6900347
  24. http://pesn.com/2013/05/30/9602324_LENR-to-Market_Weekly_May30/
  25. http://www.newsxs.com/en/go/12310685/Forbes.com_Technology/
  26. http://factorfixitremotepcrepair.factormatt.com/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/
  27. http://theeestory.ning.com/forum/topics/lenr-or-cold-fusion-thread?commentId=6495062%3AComment%3A75493&xg_source=activity
  28. http://www.ecathome.eu/?m=201305
  29. http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/05/21/the-e-cat-is-back-and-people-are-still-falling-for-it/
  30. http://realn3ws.com/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/
  31. http://energyresearch.com.au/index.php?topic=62462.0
  32. https://plus.google.com/communities/111126146224334527320
  33. http://www.ecatnews.net/author/e-cat-world/
  34. http://feedjunkie.com/item/11279692/Rossi’s%20A%20Fraud!%20No,%20He’s%20Not!%20Yes,%20He%20Is!%20No,%20He%20Isn’t!
  35. https://alpha.app.net/quistuipater/post/6203353
  36. http://ao.finalweb.net/site/aoarticle_display.asp?sec_id=140002434&news_id=140001484&issue_id=2
  37. http://www.reddit.com/r/LENR/
  38. http://pro-e-trading.com/testimonials/
  39. http://pro-e-trading.com/products/bullion/
  40. http://www.gascentre.unece.org/ece-gas-portal/news/news-agencies/forbes-energy/
  41. http://www.analysisonline.org/site/aoarticle_section.asp?issue_id=2&sec_id=140002434
  42. http://www.innovativedo.com/2013/05/elon-musk-we-need-to-leave-earth-or-we.html
  43. http://www.vastwind.com/news.php
  44. http://www.continentalwhoswho.co/index.php/ice-magazines/fall-2012
  45. https://delicious.com/Gio746
  46. http://strive-struggle-succeed.org/2013/05/29/atm-repair-is-important/
  47. http://techeffectcomputers.com/
  48. http://politicalprofanity.com/terms-of-use-privacy-policy/
  49. http://1krownpromoting.com/2012/02/26/virginia-grind-family-dj-hood/
  50. http://digitalcommerce2009.blogspot.com/2009/01/business-concept-vs-business-model.html
  51. http://www.globaladvisors.biz/inc-feed/20130529/how-fast-food-eaters-split-along-ethnic-lines/
  52. http://absolutebusiness.co/2013/05/29/avoiding-speeding-tickets/
  53. http://www.bignewsnetwork.com/index.php/sid/214852117/scat/6034630751577834
  54. http://stocktradingnewsanalysis.com/2013/05/30/practical-advice-on-the-smartest-trades-in-foreign-exchange/
  55. http://eupolitics.einnews.com/news/sweden-fraud
  56. http://businessnewsandjournal.com/whats-a-big-deal-in-commercial-real-estate-rebound/
  57. http://forexinvestmentreport.com/2013/05/10/
  58. http://onlinebizweekly.com/luiz-ros-of-the-inter-american-development-bank-on-how-business-can-fight-poverty
  59. http://www.johnyah.com/2013/05/vince-shamwow-video.html
  60. http://stockmarketsfutures.com/2013/05/29/home-based-business-tips-that-can-improve-your-life/
  61. http://www.thebusinessinvestment.com/2012/06/
  62. http://coldfusionenergytech.com/cold-fusion-science/
  63. http://www.stocktradingfinance.com/2013/05/30/the-stock-market-basics-tips-advice-and-secrets/
  64. http://markets.buffalonews.com/buffnews/news/channelinfo?ChannelID=6679
  65. http://www.metrologytools.co.uk/pressure-measuring-devices
  66. http://markets.financialcontent.com/mi.centredaily/news/read/24304138/rossi’s_a_fraud!_no
  67. http://www.pittand.com/rss/news/Rossi’s+A+Fraud!+No,+He’s+Not!+Yes,+He+Is!+No,+He+Isn’t!

 

Pay Attention Now Students…

Links at Universities to the Independent Test Report

High Energy Astrophysics Division at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Links most likely appear at other Universities as well…  
Those old cold fusioneers must  just LOVE it!

Piqued?

The verb pique means to make someone angry or annoyed.

But when something piques your interest or curiosity, like LENR, the verb pique just means to arouse, stimulate, or excite.

Both the noun and verb are pronounced “pēk” and were borrowed from a French word meaning “a prick, irritation,” from Old French, from piquer “to prick.”

So you can see how something that pricks you could make you both excited and angry. Keystone, Fracking. Fukashima… Why when we have LENR energy at hand?

Enough to make you want to storm away from our present energy policies. That storming away, by the by, might be called a “fit of pique.”

CHOOSE YOUR WORDS peak/peek/pique

Let’s look at three homophones: peak, peek, and pique.

Peak is a topmost point, such as a mountain peak, or to reach that point (finally)

We’ve had a recent peak in LENR interest.

A peek is a glance or a quick look, like you can do with all these Forbes article links.

It’s frequently paired with sneak, which can lead you to use the incorrect peak; like carbon and U238 energy futures.

If LENR doesn’t pique your interest, what will?

Take a peek at this, it’s the very peak of this vocabulary presentation.

Here’s your mnemonic device:

You have to reach to gain the peak.

If you peer at something, you are peeking.

And if you’re piqued about something, there’s usually a question in your mind.

Wikipedia Beyond Cold Fusion – part two Subatomic Particles

 

DownloadedFile

Of Particular Interest to Cold Fusioneers are the Quasiparticles

Once again we take a journey beyond the surface of the Wikipedia Cold Fusion article into the depths of Wiki Science. This journey takes us into the world of subatomic particles. The following article is gleaned from excellent Wiki articles on cutting edge subatomic research.

The inner workings of the atom involve many different exciting particles and interactions. Studying this information helps one to begin to understand the science behind the popularly known cold fusion -LENR -low energy nuclear reactive environment. Quite a few of the Quasiparticles are mentioned in cold fusion patents and papers and are of particular interest to cold fusioneers.

Much of the subatomic research presented challenges one theoretical model or another, yet none of their Wiki articles are a battleground of contention as is the Wiki article, Cold Fusion… even now.

Elementary Particles ——— 25

Composite Particles ———– 68

Quasiparticles ——————-  20

Subatomic Particles Total  –   113

More Particles Predicted – 23

Subatomic particles are the particles smaller than an atom. There are two types of subatomic particles: elementary particles, which are not made of other particles, and composite particles.

Then there are the quasiparticles.

“Not-quite-so Elementary, My Dear Electron” link

Fundamental particle ‘splits’ into quasiparticles, including the new ‘orbiton’

by Zeeya Merali 18 April 2012, Nature: International weekly journal of science

Elementary Particles  /25

The elementary particles of the Standard Model include:

A) Six “flavors” of quarks: up, down, bottom, top, strange, and charm. @6 Particle

B) Six types of leptons: electron, electron neutrino, muon, muon neutrino, tau, tau neutrino. @6 Particles

C) Twelve gauge bosons (force carriers): the photon of electromagnetism, the three W and Z bosons of the weak force, and the eight gluons of the strong force. @12 Particles

D) The Higgs boson. @1 Particle

stdchrt


Twenty five Elementary Particles

Note:  Various extensions of the Standard Model predict
the existence of an elementary graviton particle
and many other elementary particles.

 

Composite Particles /68

Composite subatomic particles (such as protons or atomic nuclei) are bound states of two or more elementary particles. For example, a proton is made of two up quarks and one down quark, while the atomic nucleus of helium-4 is composed of two protons and two neutrons. Composite particles include all hadrons, a group composed of baryons (e.g., protons and neutrons) and mesons (e.g., pions and kaons).

Elementary particles are particles with no measurable internal structure; that is, they are not composed of other particles. They are the fundamental objects of quantum field theory. Many families and sub-families of elementary particles exist. Elementary particles are classified according to their spin. Fermions have half-integer spin while bosons have integer spin. All the particles of the Standard Model have been experimentally observed, recently including the Higgs boson.

Fermions (quarks and leptons) @22

Fermions are one of the two fundamental classes of particles, the other being bosons. Fermion particles are described by Fermi–Dirac statistics and have quantum numbers described by the Pauli exclusion principle. They include the quarks and leptons, as well as any composite particles consisting of an odd number of these, such as all baryons and many atoms and nuclei.

Fermions have half-integer spin; for all known elementary fermions this is 1⁄2. All known fermions are also Dirac fermions; that is, each known fermion has its own distinct antiparticle. It is not known whether the neutrino is a Dirac fermion or a Majorana fermion. Fermions are the basic building blocks of all matter. They are classified according to whether they interact via the color force or not. In the Standard Model, there are 12 types of elementary fermions: six quarks and six leptons.

Quarks – Quarks are the fundamental constituents of hadrons and interact via the strong interaction. Quarks are the only known carriers of fractional charge, but because they combine in groups of three (baryons) or in groups of two with antiquarks (mesons), only integer charge is observed in nature. Their respective antiparticles are the antiquarks which are identical except for the fact that they carry the opposite electric charge (for example the up quark carries charge +2⁄3, while the up antiquark carries charge −2⁄3), color charge, and baryon number. There are six flavors of quarks; the three positively charged quarks are called up-type quarks and the three negatively charged quarks are called down-type quarks.

Six Quarks and their antiparticles the Six Antiquarks @12 Particles

1) Up Quark

2) Down Quark

3) Charm Quark

4) Strange Quark

5) Top Quark

6) Bottom Quark

Leptons – Leptons do not interact via the strong interaction. Their respective antiparticles are the antileptons which are identical except for the fact that they carry the opposite electric charge and lepton number. The antiparticle of the electron is the antielectron, which is nearly always called positron for historical reasons. There are six leptons in total; the three charged leptons are called electron-like leptons, while the neutral leptons are called neutrinos. Neutrinos are known to oscillate, so that neutrinos of definite flavour do not have definite mass, rather they exist in a superposition of mass eigenstates wiki. The hypothetical heavy right-handed neutrino, called a sterile neutrino, has been left off the list.

The Five Leptons and their antiparticles the Five Antileptons @10 Particles

1) Electron

2) Electron nutrino

3) Muon

4) Tau

5) Tau nutrino

Bosons (elementary bosons)

Bosons are one of the two fundamental classes of particles, the other being fermions. Bosons are characterized by Bose–Einstein statistics and all have integer spins. Bosons may be either elementary, like photons and gluons, or composite, like mesons. The graviton is added to the list although it is not predicted by the Standard Model, but by other theories in the framework of quantum field theory.

An important characteristic of bosons is that there is no limit to the number that can occupy the same quantum state. This property is evidenced, among other areas, in helium-4 when it is cooled to become a superfluid. In contrast, two fermions cannot occupy the same quantum space. Whereas fermions make up matter, bosons, which are “force carriers” function as the ‘glue’ that holds matter together. There is a deep relationship between this property and integer spin (s = 0, 1, 2 etc.).

The Higgs boson is postulated by electroweak theory primarily to explain the origin of particle masses. In a process known as the Higgs mechanism, the Higgs boson and the other gauge bosons in the Standard Model acquire mass via spontaneous symmetry breaking of the SU(2) gauge symmetry. The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) predicts several Higgs bosons. The graviton is not a Standard Model particle. Furthermore, gravity is non-renormalizable.The Higgs boson has been observed at the CERN/LHC dated 14th March in 2013 around the level of energy 126,5GeV and at the accuracy of five-sigma (>99,4% which accepted as definitive)

The fundamental forces of nature are mediated by gauge bosons, and mass is believed to be created by the Higgs Field. According to the Standard Model (and to both linearized general relativity and string theory, in the case of the graviton). While most bosons are composite particles, in the Standard Model, there are five bosons which are elementary:

A) The four gauge bosons (γ · g · Z · W±)

B) The Higgs boson (H0)

Five Elementary Bosons / these 5 Particles are already tallied

The following Composite bosons are important in superfluidity and other applications of Bose–Einstein condensates.

Hadrons (baryons and mesons) @46

Hadrons are defined as strongly interacting composite particles. Hadrons are either: Composite fermions, in which case they are called baryons. or Composite bosons, in which case they are called mesons.

Quark models, first proposed in 1964 independently by Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig (who called quarks “aces”), describe the known hadrons as composed of valence quarks and/or antiquarks, tightly bound by the color force, which is mediated by gluons. A “sea” of virtual quark-antiquark pairs is also present in each hadron.

Baryons – Baryons are the family of composite particle made of three quarks, as opposed to the mesons which are the family of composite particles made of one quark and one antiquark. Both baryons and mesons are part of the larger particle family comprising all particles made of quarks – the hadron. The term baryon is derived from the Greek “βαρύς” (barys), meaning “heavy”, because at the time of their naming it was believed that baryons were characterized by having greater masses than other particles that were classed as matter.

Since baryons are composed of quarks, they participate in the strong interaction. Leptons on the other hand, are not composed of quarks and as such do not participate in the strong interaction. The most famous baryons are the protons and neutrons which make up most of the mass of the visible matter in the universe, whereas electrons (the other major component of atoms) are leptons. Each baryon has a corresponding antiparticle (antibaryon) where quarks are replaced by their corresponding antiquarks. For example, a proton is made of two up quarks and one down quark; and its corresponding antiparticle, the antiproton, is made of two up antiquarks and one down antiquark.

A combination of three u, d or s-quarks with a total spin of 3⁄2 form the so-called baryon decuplet. Proton quark structure: 2 up quarks and 1 down quark.

This list is of all known and predicted baryons: 1)nucleon/proton 2) nucleon/neutron 3) Lamda 4) charmed Lamda 5) bottom Lamda 6) Sigma 7) charmed Sigma 8) bottom Sigma 9) Xi 10) charmed Xi 11) charmed Xi prime 12) double charged Xi prime 13) bottom Xi 14) bottom Xi prime 15) charmed bottom Xi 16) charmed bottom Xi prime 17) charmed Omega 18) bottom Omega 19) double charmed Omega, 20) charmed bottom Omega 21) charmed bottom Omega prime, 22) double bottom Omega, 23) double charmed bottom Omega, 24) charmed double bottom Omega @24 Particles

Mesons – Ordinary mesons are made up of a valence quark and a valence antiquark. Because mesons have spin of 0 or 1 and are not themselves elementary particles, they are composite bosons. Examples of mesons include the pion, kaon, the J/ψ. In quantum hydrodynamic models, mesons mediate the residual strong force between nucleons.

At one time or another, positive signatures have been reported for all of the following exotic mesons but their existence has yet to be confirmed.

A tetraquark consists of two valence quarks and two valence antiquarks;

A glueball is a bound state of gluons with no valence quarks;

Hybrid mesons consist of one or more valence quark-antiquark pairs and one or more real gluons.

This list is of all known and predicted scalar,  pseudoscalar and vector mesons:

1) Pion 2) Antipion 3) Eta meson 4) Eta prime meson 5) charmed eta meson 6) Bottom eta meson 7) Kaon 8) K- Short 9) K- Long 10) D meson 11) Anti D meson 12) Strange D meson 13) B meson 14) Anti B meson 15) Strange B meson 16) Charmed B meson 17) Charged rho meson 18) Neutral rho meson 19) Omega meson 20) Phi meson 21) J/Psi 22) Upsilon meson @22 Particles

There are two complications with neutral kaons: Due to neutral kaon mixing, the K0
S and K0
L are not eigenstates of strangeness. However, they are eigenstates of the weak force, which determines how they decay, so these are the particles with definite lifetime.

Note that these issues also exist in principle for other neutral flavored mesons; however, the weak eigenstates are considered separate particles only for kaons because of their dramatically different lifetimes.

1.10471

Quasiparticles /20

In physics, quasiparticles and collective excitations (which are closely related) are emergent phenomena wiki that occur when a microscopically complicated system such as a solid behaves as if it contained different (fictitious) weakly interacting particles in free space. For example, as an electron travels through a semiconductor, its motion is disturbed in a complex way by its interactions with all of the other electrons and nuclei; however it approximately behaves like an electron with a different mass traveling unperturbed through free space. This “electron” with a different mass is called an “electron quasiparticle”. In an even more surprising example, the aggregate motion of electrons in the valence band of a semiconductor is the same as if the semiconductor contained instead positively charged quasiparticles called holes. Other quasiparticles or collective excitations include phonons (particles derived from the vibrations of atoms in a solid), plasmons (particles derived from plasma oscillations), and many others.

These fictitious particles are typically called “quasiparticles” if they are fermions (like electrons and holes), and called “collective excitations” if they are bosons (like phonons and plasmons), although the precise distinction is not universally agreed.

Quasiparticles are most important in condensed matter physics, as it is one of the few known ways of simplifying the quantum mechanical many-body problem (and as such, it is applicable to any number of other many-body systems).

This is a list of quasiparticles (study them at the following Wikipedia links)

1)  Bipolaron – A bound pair of two polarons

2)  Chargon – A quasiparticle produced as a result of electron spin-charge separation

3)  Configuron  – An elementary configurational excitation in an amorphous material which involves breaking of a chemical bond

4)  Electron quasiparticle – An electron as affected by the other forces and interactions in the solid

5)  Electron hole  – A lack of electron in a valence band

6)  Exciton – A bound state of an electron and a hole

7)  Fracton – A collective quantized vibration on a substrate with a fractal structure.

8)  Holon – A quasi-particle resulting from electron spin-charge separation

9)  Magnon – A coherent excitation of electron spins in a material

10) Orbiton  – A quasiparticle resulting from electron spin-orbital separation

11) Phason – Vibrational modes in a quasicrystal associated with atomic rearrangements

12) Phonon – Vibrational modes in a crystal lattice associated with atomic shifts

13) Plasmaron – A quasiparticle emerging from the coupling between a plasmon and a hole

14) Plasmon  – A coherent excitation of a plasma

15) Polaron – A moving charged quasiparticle that is surrounded by ions in a material

16) Polariton – A mixture of photon with other quasiparticles

17) Roton – Elementary excitation in superfluid Helium-4

18) Soliton  – A self-reinforcing solitary excitation wave

19) Spinon  – A quasiparticle produced as a result of electron spin-charge separation

20) Trion – A coherent excitation of three quasiparticles (two holes and one electron or two electrons and one hole) Quasiparticles @20 particles

References quasiparticles ^ Angell, C.A.; Rao, K.J. Configurational excitations in condensed matter, and “bond lattice” model for the liquid-glass transition. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 57, 470-481 ^ J. Schlappa, K. Wohlfeld, K. J. Zhou, M. Mourigal, M. W. Haverkort, V. N. Strocov, L. Hozoi, C. Monney, S. Nishimoto, S. Singh, A. Revcolevschi, J.-S. Caux, L. Patthey, H. M. Rønnow, J. van den Brink, and T. Schmitt; (18.04.2012). “Spin–orbital separation in the quasi-one-dimensional Mott insulator Sr2CuO3”. Nature, Advance Online Publication. arXiv:1205.1954. Bibcode:2012Natur.485…82S. doi:10.1038/nature10974.

Supersymmetric theories predict the existence of more particles, none of which have been confirmed experimentally as of 2011:

1) neutralino 2) chargino 3) photino 4) wino/zino 5) Higgsino 6) gluino

7) gravitino 8) sleptons 9) sneutrino 10) squarks @10 Particles

No matter if you use the original gauginos or this superpositions as a basis, the only predicted physical particles are neutralinos and charginos as a superposition of them together with the Higgsinos.

Other theories predict the existence of additional bosons and fermions.

List of Other hypothetical bosons and fermions:

1) graviton 2) graviscalar 3) graviphoton 4) axion 5) saxion 6) branon 7) dilaton 8) X & Y bosons

9) W & Z bosons 10) magnetic photon 11) majoron 12) majorana fermion 13) Chameleon  @13 Particles

Mirror particles are predicted by theories that restore parity symmetry.

Magnetic monopole is a generic name for particles with non-zero magnetic charge. They are predicted by some GUTs.

Tachyon is a generic name for hypothetical particles that travel faster than the speed of light and have an imaginary rest mass.

Kaluza-Klein towers of particles are predicted by some models of extra dimensions. The extra-dimensional momentum is manifested as extra mass in four-dimensional space-time.

Timeline of Subatomic Particle Discoveries

Including all particles thus far discovered which appear to be elementary (that is, indivisible) given the best available evidence. It also includes the discovery of composite particles and antiparticles that were of particular historical importance.

More specifically, the inclusion criteria are:

Elementary particles from the Standard Model of particle physics that have so far been observed. The Standard Model is the most comprehensive existing model of particle behavior. All Standard Model particles including the Higgs boson have been verified, and all other observed particles are combinations of two or more Standard Model particles.

Antiparticles which were historically important to the development of particle physics, specifically the positron and antiproton. The discovery of these particles required very different experimental methods from that of their ordinary matter counterparts, and provided evidence that all particles had antiparticles—an idea that is fundamental to quantum field theory, the modern mathematical framework for particle physics. In the case of most subsequent particle discoveries, the particle and its anti-particle were discovered essentially simultaneously.

Composite particles which were the first particle discovered containing a particular elementary constituent, or whose discovery was critical to the understanding of particle physics.

Note that there have been many other composite particles discovered; see list of mesons wiki and list of baryons wiki. See list of particles wiki for a more general list of particles, including hypothetical particles.

  • 1800: William Herschel discovers “heat rays”
  • 1801: Johann Wilhelm Ritter made the hallmark observation that invisible rays just beyond the violet end of the visible spectrum were especially effective at lightening silver chloride-soaked paper. He called them “oxidizing rays” to emphasize chemical reactivity and to distinguish them from “heat rays” at the other end of the invisible spectrum (both of which were later determined to be photons). The more general term “chemical rays” was adopted shortly thereafter to describe the oxidizing rays, and it remained popular throughout the 19th century. The terms chemical and heat rays were eventually dropped in favor of ultraviolet and infrared radiation, respectively.

Albert Einstein Born in Ulm, Germany, in 1879.

  • 1895: Discovery of the ultraviolet radiation below 200 nm, named vacuum ultraviolet (later identified as photons) because it is strongly absorbed by air, by the German physicist Victor Schumann.
  • 1895: X-ray produced by Wilhelm Röntgen (later identified as photons).
  • 1897: Electron discovered by J.J. Thomson.
  • 1899: Alpha particle discovered by Ernest Rutherford in uranium radiation.

Albert Einstein received his fist teaching diploma from Zurich Polytechnic in 1900.

  • 1900: Gamma ray (a high-energy photon) discovered by Paul Villard in uranium decay.
  • 1911: Atomic nucleus identified by Ernest Rutherford, based on scattering observed by Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden.
  • 1919: Proton discovered by Ernest Rutherford.

Martin Fleischmann Born in Karlovy Vary, Czechoslovakia, in 1927.

  • 1932: Neutron discovered by James Chadwick (predicted by Rutherford in 1920).
  • 1932: Antielectron (or positron) the first antiparticle, discovered by Carl D. Anderson (proposed by Paul Dirac in 1927 and by Ettore Majorana in 1928).
  • 1937: Muon (or mu lepton) discovered by Seth Neddermeyer, Carl D. Anderson, J.C. Street, and E.C. Stevenson, using cloud chamber measurements of cosmic rays. (It was mistaken for the pion until 1947).
  • 1947: Pion (or pi meson) discovered by C. F. Powell’s group (predicted by Hideki Yukawa in 1935).
  • 1947: Kaon (or K meson), the first strange particle, discovered by George Dixon Rochester and Clifford Charles Butler.
  • 1947: Λ0 discovered during a study of cosmic ray interactions.

Martin Fleischmann received his PhD from Imperial College London in 1950.

  • 1955: Antiproton discovered by Owen Chamberlain, Emilio Segrè, Clyde Wiegand, and Thomas Ypsilantis.
  • 1956: Electron neutrino detected by Frederick Reines and Clyde Cowan (proposed by Wolfgang Pauli in 1931 to explain the apparent violation of energy conservation in beta decay). At the time it was simply referred to as neutrino since there was only one known neutrino.
  • 1962: Muon neutrino (or mu neutrino) shown to be distinct from the electron neutrino by a group headed by Leon Lederman.
  • 1964: Xi baryon discovery at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
  • 1969: Partons (internal constituents of hadrons) observed in deep inelastic scattering experiments between protons and electrons at SLAC; this was eventually associated with the quark model (predicted by Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig in 1964) and thus constitutes the discovery of the up quark, down quark, and strange quark.
  • 1974: J/ψ meson discovered by groups headed by Burton Richter and Samuel Ting, demonstrating the existence of the charm quark  (proposed by James Bjorken and Sheldon Lee Glashow in 1964).
  • 1975: Tau discovered by a group headed by Martin Perl.
  • 1977: Upsilon meson discovered at Fermilab, demonstrating the existence of the bottom quark  (proposed by Kobayashi and Maskawa in 1973).
  • 1979: Gluon observed indirectly in three jet events at DESY.
  • 1983: W and Z bosons discovered by Carlo Rubbia, Simon van der Meer, and the CERN UA1 collaboration (predicted in detail by Sheldon Glashow, Abdus Salam, and Steven Weinberg).

The “Cold Fusion” announcement of 1989.

  • 1995: Top quark discovered at Fermilab.
  • 1995: Antihydrogen produced and measured by the LEAR experiment at CERN.
  • 2000: Tau neutrino first observed directly at Fermilab.
  • 2011: Antihelium-4 produced and measured by the STAR detector; the first particle to be discovered by the experiment.
  • 2011: χb(3P) discovered by researchers conducting the ATLAS experiment at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider; the first particle to be discovered by this experiment.
  • 2011: An excited neutral Xi-b baryon Ξ∗0
b discovered by researchers conducting the Compact Muon Solenoid experiment at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, in concert with researchers at the University of Zurich; it is the first particle discovered by the CMS.
  • 2012: A particle exhibiting most of the predicted characteristics of the Higgs boson discovered by researchers conducting the Compact Muon Solenoid and ATLAS experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.

Mystery or Knot Science “Cold Fusion” – LENR

DownloadedFile-3Mystery or Knot Science

 

Mystery is a Knot…  Intertwining

Science is an Art…  Unraveling

 

Love is a World – Operation

Love is a Lattice – Vibration

Love is a Source – Energizing

Love is a Life – Learning

 

Love is the Earth – We Birth

Love is the Water – We Drink

Love is the Fire – We Live

Love is the Air – We Breathe

 

An Art of the   Love of Science

The Rites of    Well Being

 

For All Life

 

Essence of Spirit

Heart of Matter

 

The End

The Beginning

 

Love Is

 

The Cold Fusion Quantum

Energy – Knot       Now

 

Unravelled

 

gbgoble2013

 

Ravel (the phase before unravelment)

 

Ravel

 

Verb

raveled, raveling, also  ravels

 

Verb Transitive

1. To separate the fibers or threads of (cloth, for example); unravel.

 

2. To clarify by separating the aspects of.

 

3. To tangle or complicate.

 

Verb Intransitive

1. To become separated into its component threads; unravel or fray.

 

2. To become tangled or confused.

 

Noun  – A Raveling

1. A broken or discarded thread.

 

2. A tangle.

 

Ravelen – Obsolete Dutch

 

Ravel – [ˈrævəl]

raveller n. – ravelly adj – ravel vbs, also -els, -elling, -elled / in U.S. -els -eling, -eled

 

1. to tangle (threads, fibres, etc.) or (of threads, fibres, etc.) to become entangled

 

2. (often foll by out) to tease or draw out (the fibres of a fabric or garment) or (of a garment or fabric) to fray out in loose ends; unravel

 

3. (tr; usually foll by out) to disentangle or resolve to ravel out a complicated story

 

4. to break up (a road surface) in patches or (of a road surface) to begin to break up; fret; scab

 

5. Archaic to make or become confused or complicated

 

Ravelen –  A Middle Dutch Noun

 

A tangle or complication.

(quantum energy is presently attaining unravelment)

 

Cold Fusion Now!

 

Explore The Low Energy Nuclear Reaction Unravelled

 

Images from

“Ancient Celtic Knots Inspire Scientific Breakthrough”

Minute knots and chains have industrial and medical uses.

The Irish Times Science article 

Reflections on the Past, Directions for the Future Ecological Restoration LENR

DownloadedFile-2

Become a Member

Regional Chapters of the Society for Ecological Restoration

Chapters play a crucial role in fulfilling the Society’s mission. Led by dedicated volunteers, SER Chapters focus on local issues and give our members the opportunity to mobilize and engage in regions around the world. We are proud to partner with our chapters in Australasia, Asia, Europe and North America to advance our common goals.

Asia SER Nepal Chapter: Established in 2011 and serving members in Nepal

Australasia SER Australasia Chapter: Established in 1999 and serving members in 17 countries throughout Australasia

Europe SER Europe Chapter: Established in 2001 and serving members in Europe and the British Isles

North America

SER British Columbia Chapter: Established 1999 and serving members in British Columbia, Canada

SER Central Rockies Chapter: Established in 1996 and serving members in Colorado and Wyoming

SER Great Basin ChapterEstablished in 2011 to serve members in Utah, Nevada, southern Idaho, southeastern Oregon and eastern California

SER Mid-Atlantic ChapterEstablished in 2004 and serving members in Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia

SER Midwest-Great Lakes ChapterEstablished in 2008 and serving members in Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin

SER New England ChapterEstablished in 2005 and serving members in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut

SER Northwest ChapterEstablished in 1992 and serving members in the Cascadia Bioregion, including Alaska, Idaho, Northern California, Montana, Oregon and Washington

SER Ontario ChapterEstablished in 1994 and serving members in Ontario, Canada

SER Southeast ChapterEstablished in 1995 and serving members in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee

SER Southwest ChapterEstablished in 2011 and serving members in Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, southern Nevada and southern California

SER Texas ChapterEstablished in 1995 to serve members in Texas

 

Cold Fusion Now Activist Report

As cold fusion LENR technology matures with market applications, I can not help but reach out to those who I hope most to succeed. Environmental Remediation (removal of toxins or radio-actives) and Environmental Restoration (ecology revival) are fairly new industries with an impressive growth rate.

The science of LENT – low energy nuclear transmutations, for the first time, allows us to advance beyond the contain or bury “solution” for nuclear waste; supplying a method to transmute these from harmful to benign elements.

Almost as a side benefit, (considering the boon of the aforementioned LENT technology) LENR energy will benefit the peoples of the Society for Ecological Restoration, as it will all of us, with reduced energy expenses. (restoration/remediation projects have high energy costs)

Ecological restoration and environmental remediation will be empowered and enabled by the recent validation of marketable LENR energy and emerging LENT (transmutation science). These folks deserve it, their hearts are in the right place as well as their brains.

Become a member, attend their 25th anniversary celebration, and watch this fast growing industry.

As the oil, coal, and U238 energy industry and infrastructure collapses there will be lots of more clean-up projects going on. Cold fusioneers seeking employment should attend. Exciting opportunities can be found. We will be creating them. Cold Fusion Now.

“Reflections on the Past, Directions for the Future”

Thanks be – gbgoble – 2013

 

The SER2013 World Conference on Ecological Restoration and 25th Anniversary

Reflections on the Past…

Directions for the Future 

The SER2013 World Conference on Ecological Restoration: Reflections on the Past, Directions for the Future will bring together more than 1,200 delegates from around the world interested in the science and practice of ecological restoration as it relates to natural resource management, climate change responses, biodiversity conservation, local and indigenous communities, environmental policy and sustainable livelihoods.

SER2013 is the 5th World Conference of the Society for Ecological Restoration

It is no secret that today’s world is struggling with the challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss, sustainable resource extraction and human poverty. Here at SER, we stand firm in our belief that ecological restoration plays a crucial role in mitigating and adapting to these challenges. We envision a future where ecological restoration is widely and effectively implemented to re-establish and enhance biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being. Since our incorporation in 1988, we have made it our mission to advance the field of ecological restoration.

Global Network

SER has grown into one of the world’s leading global networks dedicated solely to the science and practice of ecological restoration.

-Established chapters to advance our mission in fourteen regions around the world

-Expanded our network to include members in over 70 countries around the world, solidifying a global voice behind ecological restoration

-Hosted world conferences in Spain, Australia, Mexico, Canada, England and the United States to allowed academics, practitioners, and students come together to exchange ideas, showcase their work, forge new alliances and participate in workshops, field trips and other educational activities

Policy and International Collaboration

SER participates in international fora that engage the public, private and NGO sectors at global, regional, national and local levels, to advocate for the use of appropriate, participatory, and knowledge-based restoration activities. Click here for detailed information on all of SER’s global partnerships.

– Established partnership with the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2007 to collaborate on the ways and means to support ecosystem restoration as a practical tool for the Parties to the Convention

– Entered agreement with the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and participated with the preparation of proposals for updating and expanding existing Ramsar guidance on the restoration and rehabilitation of lost or degraded wetlands

– Contributed to various IUCN ‘Internional Union for the Conservation of Nature’ commissions and initiatives over the past decade

– Launched initiative with the Wildlands Network to bridge the gap between the science and practice of ecological restoration and the practice of conservation biology and landscape ecology within the context of connecting regionally significant fragmented wildlands in North America.

Publications and Resources

SER distributes a variety of publications and resources aimed at education, practical application and awareness.

-Launched the Global Restoration Network, an online database that links research, projects, and practitioners around the world

-Established book series on ecological restoration in collaboration with Island Press to create a forum devoted to advancing restoration science and practice through an interdisciplinary approach

-Produced Restoration Ecology, a peer-reviewed journal that highlights the results of restoration projects worldwide as well as scientific advances, practical implications, lessons learned and new perspectives

-Developed the SER Primer on Ecological Restoration (pdf), a concise statement of restoration principles and includes a clear definition of what restoration is, how it is planned, conducted, and evaluated, and how it coordinates with related disciplines

-Released Investing in our Ecological Infrastructure (pdf), a timely and relevant brochure, to highlight the economic benefits inherent in ecological restoration projects

Introduced conversation on the role of ecological restoration in mitigating climate change and ongoing biodiversity loss through Opportunities and Challenges for Ecological Restoration within REDD+ (pdf)

Cold Fusion Now Acivist Letter Sent

To The Society for Ecological Restoration


Dr. Dhanajay Regmi, Professor Kingsley Dixon, Vern Newton, Norbert Hölzel, Tamara Bonnemaison, Wendy Horan, Professor Eric Higgs, Professor Mark Paschke, Nancy Shaw, Michael Leff, Nancy Sherman, Bruce Pluta, Dennis Burton, Professor Roger Anderson, Professor Young D. Choi, Mickey Marcus, Denise Burchsted MD, Jules Opton-Himmel, Allison Warner, Dr. W. Barry Southerland, Rolf Gersonde, Ray Entz, Sal Spitale, Professor Stephen Murphy, Jennifer Franklin, Charlotte Reemts, Kelly Lyons, Marissa Sipo


Respectfully to each of you…

and your colleagues,


I would like to discuss Cold Fusion / LENR Energy and LENT Science.

My hope is that you will make this a highlight at your upcoming international conference (SER 2013).

These three articles will show you the importance of this emerging clean energy technology.

Please call and discuss the possibilities.

Nearly Free and Unlimited – Totally Nonpolluting

Benign Transmutation of Radioactive Elements

Energy and Science to Empower and Enable Ecological Restoration and Environmental Remediation

On a Scale Never Seen Before

This century will be known as…

The Century of Ecological Restoration and Environmental Remediation

“Andrea Rossi’s Third Party Report Released”

“Field Work of Cesium Decontamination by Nano Silver”

“Oilprice.com Links COT and New Energy Breakthrough”

NASA sees LENR energy as the solution to global warming and all our energy needs.

At a fraction of present energy costs.

Go to… * (NASA Technology Gateway) * (NASA Climate Change) *  (NASA LENR Video) *

Imagine all the people working in the Society for Ecological Restoration, empowered and enabled.

Thank you for the loving works you do… we love you.

I look forward to speaking with you.

Gregory B. Goble (Cold Fusion Now .Org – Activist and Writer)

(415) 724-6702

Wikipedia Beyond Cold Fusion: A Journey Into the Depths of Wiki Science

It has been noted by many that the Wikipedia Cold Fusion article is not a good source for those seeking information on the art of this science. The Wiki article quibbles as to whether cold fusion research is actually science. The Wiki article also does not recognize the peer review process of LENR-CANR.org or other cold fusion science journals; seeing them as publications by a group of self promoting crackpot scientists, deluding us and each other with dreams of infinite energy akin to perpetual motion, i.e. pseudoscience. This limits valid source material, turning Wiki Cold Fusion into a battle ground and a poor encyclopedic science article with a very low Wiki rating.

To get to the heart of this matter, we will go beyond the surface of the field of battle at the Wiki cold fusion article and find, there in the depths of Wikipedia, the workings of the science behind the clean low energy nuclear reaction environment; now emerging into the marketplace as popular ‘cold fusion’ LENR energy.

It is heartening to find, in Wikipedia, science that challenges known theory; and which confirms the science and the physics surrounding the low energy nuclear reaction. Here we have proof that the coverage of cutting edge cold fusion research has been sorely mistreated by the senior Wiki editors who ride that post. Explore the depths of  Wiki science and find that nowhere else is cutting edge research which challenges known theory thrown into such a battleground of contention, as is found at the Wikipedia article about Cold Fusion… Now, why with recent developments is this so?

 

Explore Key Words at Wiki From This Cold Fusion (LENR) Patent

“Method for Producing Heavy Electrons”, NASA LENR Patent (USPTO link)

Surface plasmons (SPs), Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), Resonant frequency, Heavy electrons, Metal hydride, Fractal geometry, Energy, Unconventional superconductivity, Weak antiferromagnetism, Pseudo metamagnetism, Hydrogenated/deuterated molecular structures such as graphane and its nanotube variants, Quasi-crystalline arrays, Metamaterials, Dusty plasmas

Surface plasmons (SPs) are coherent electron oscillations that exist at the interface between any two materials where the real part of the dielectric function changes sign across the interface (e.g. a metal-dielectric interface, such as a metal sheet in air). SPs have lower energy than bulk (or volume) plasmons which quantise the longitudinal electron oscillations about positive ion cores within the bulk of an electron gas (or plasma). The existence of surface plasmons was first predicted in 1957 by Rufus Ritchie. In the following two decades, surface plasmons were extensively studied by many scientists, the foremost of whom were T. Turbadar in the 1950s and 1960s, and Heinz Raether, E. Kretschmann, and A. Otto in the 1960s and 1970s. Information transfer in nanoscale structures, similar to photonics, by means of surface plasmons, is referred to as plasmonics. Surface plasmons can be excited by both electrons and photons. (Wiki)

Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), are infrared or visible frequency electromagnetic waves trapped at or guided along metal-dielectric interfaces. These are shorter in wavelength than the incident light (photons). Hence, SPPs can provide a significant reduction in effective wavelength and a corresponding significant increase in spatial confinement and local field intensity. Collective charge oscillations at the boundary between an insulating dielectric medium (such as air or glass) and a metal (such as gold, silver or copper) are able to sustain the propagation of infrared or visible frequency electromagnetic waves known as surface plasmon-polaritons (SPP). SPPs are guided along metal-dielectric interfaces much in the same way light can be guided by an optical fiber, with the unique characteristic of subwavelength-scale confinement perpendicular to the interface. Surface plasmons (not SPPs), occur as light induced packets of electrical charges collectively oscillate at the surfaces of metals at optical frequencies.

Under specific conditions, the light that radiates the object (incident light) couples with the surface plasmons to create self-sustaining, propagating electromagnetic waves known as surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs). Once launched, the SPPs ripple along the metal-dielectric interface and do not stray from this narrow path. Compared with the incident light that triggered the transformation, the SPPs can be much shorter in wavelength. In other words, when SPs couple with a photon, the resulting hybridised excitation is called a surface plasmon polariton (SPP). This SPP can propagate along the surface of a metal until energy is lost either via absorption in the metal or radiation into free-space. (Wiki)

Resonant frequencies In physics, resonance is the tendency of a system to oscillate with greater amplitude at some frequencies than at others. Frequencies at which the response amplitude is a relative maximum are known as the system’s resonant frequencies, or resonance frequencies. At these frequencies, even small periodic driving forces can produce large amplitude oscillations, because the system stores vibrational energy. Resonance occurs when a system is able to store and easily transfer energy between two or more different storage modes (such as kinetic energy and potential energy in the case of a pendulum). Resonance phenomena occur with all types of vibrations or waves: there is mechanical resonance, acoustic resonance, electromagnetic resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), electron spin resonance (ESR), and resonance of quantum wave functions. (Wiki)

Muons (mu mesons aka heavy electrons) Muons are denoted by μ− and antimuons by μ+. Muons were previously called mu mesons, but are not classified as mesons by modern particle physicists (see History). Muons have a mass of 105.7 MeV/c2, which is about 200 times the mass of an electron. Since the muon’s interactions are very similar to those of the electron, a muon can be thought of as a much heavier version of the electron. The eventual recognition of the “mu meson” muon as a simple “heavy electron” with no role at all in the nuclear interaction, seemed so incongruous and surprising at the time, that Nobel laureate I. I. Rabi famously quipped, “Who ordered that?” Muonic helium is created by substituting a muon for one of the electrons in helium-4. The muon orbits much closer to the nucleus, so muonic helium can therefore be regarded like an isotope of hydrogen whose nucleus consists of two neutrons, two protons and a muon, with a single electron outside. Colloquially, it could be called “hydrogen 4.1”, since the mass of the muon is roughly 0.1 au. Chemically, muonic helium, possessing an unpaired valence electron, can bond with other atoms, and behaves more like a hydrogen atom than an inert helium atom. A positive muon, when stopped in ordinary matter, can also bind an electron and form an exotic atom known as muonium (Mu) atom, in which the muon acts as the nucleus. The positive muon, in this context, can be considered a pseudo-isotope of hydrogen with one ninth of the mass of the proton. Because the reduced mass of muonium, and hence its Bohr radius, is very close to that of hydrogen, this short-lived “atom” behaves chemically — to a first approximation — like hydrogen, deuterium and tritium. Since the production of muons requires an available center of momentum frame energy of 105.7 MeV, neither ordinary radioactive decay events nor nuclear fission and fusion events (such as those occurring in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons) are energetic enough to produce muons. Only nuclear fission produces single-nuclear-event energies in this range, but does not produce muons as the production of a single muon is possible only through the weak interaction, which does not take part in a nuclear fission. (Wiki)

Metal hydrides Complex metal hydrides are salts wherein the anions contain hydrides. In the older chemical literature as well as contemporary materials science textbooks, a “metal hydride” is assumed to be nonmolecular, i.e. three-dimensional lattices of atomic ions. In such systems, hydrides are often interstitial and nonstoichiometric, and the bonding between the metal and hydrogen atoms is significantly ionic. In contrast, complex metal hydrides typically contain more than one type of metal or metalloid and may be soluble but invariably react with water. (Wiki)

Fractal Geometry One often cited description that Mandelbrot published to describe geometric fractals is “a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole”; this is generally helpful but limited. Authorities disagree on the exact definition of fractal, but most usually elaborate on the basic ideas of self-similarity and an unusual relationship with the space a fractal is embedded in. One point agreed on is that fractal patterns are characterized by fractal dimensions, but whereas these numbers quantify complexity (i.e., changing detail with changing scale), they neither uniquely describe nor specify details of how to construct particular fractal patterns. Multifractal scaling: characterized by more than one fractal dimension or scaling rule. Fine or detailed structure at arbitrarily small scales. A consequence of this structure is fractals may have emergent properties; irregularity locally and globally that is not easily described in traditional Euclidean geometric language. (Wiki)

Energy In physics, energy is an indirectly observed quantity which comes in many forms, such as kinetic energy, potential energy, radiant energy, and many others; which are listed in this summary article. This is a major topic in science and technology and this article gives an overview of its major aspects, and provides links to the many specific articles about energy in its different forms and contexts. The question “what is energy?” is difficult to answer in a simple, intuitive way, although energy can be rigorously defined in theoretical physics. In the words of Richard Feynman, “It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount.”   Whenever physical scientists discover that a certain phenomenon appears to violate the law of energy conservation, new forms may be added, as is the case with dark energy, a hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space and tends to increase the rate of expansion of the universe. (Wiki)

Unconventional Superconductors are materials that display superconductivity which does not conform to either the conventional BCS theory or the Nikolay Bogolyubov’s theory or its extensions. After more than twenty years of intensive research the origin of high-temperature superconductivity is still not clear, but it seems that instead of electron-phonon attraction mechanisms, as in conventional superconductivity, one is dealing with genuine electronic mechanisms (e.g. by antiferromagnetic correlations), and instead of s-wave pairing, d-waves are substantial. One goal of all this research is room-temperature superconductivity . A room-temperature superconductor is a hypothetical material which would be capable of exhibiting superconductivity at operating temperatures above 0° C (273.15 K). While this is not strictly “room temperature” (which would be approx. 20–25 °C), it is the temperature at which ice forms and can be reached and maintained easily in an everyday environment. At present, the highest temperature superconducting materials are the cuprates, which have demonstrated superconductivity at atmospheric pressure at temperatures as high as -135 °C (138 K). It is unknown whether any material exhibiting room-temperature superconductivity exists. The interest in its discovery arises from the repeated discovery of superconductivity at temperatures previously unexpected or held to be impossible. The potential benefits for society and science if such a material did exist are profound. (Wiki)

Weak antiferromagnetism One of the fundamental properties of an electron (besides that it carries charge) is that it has a dipole moment, i.e., it behaves itself as a tiny magnet. This dipole moment comes from the more fundamental property of the electron that it has quantum mechanical spin. The quantum mechanical nature of this spin causes the electron to only be able to be in two states, with the magnetic field either pointing “up” or “down” (for any choice of up and down). The spin of the electrons in atoms is the main source of ferromagnetism, although there is also a contribution from the orbital angular momentum of the electron about the nucleus. When these tiny magnetic dipoles are aligned in the same direction, their individual magnetic fields add together to create a measurable macroscopic field. However, in materials with a filled electron shell, the total dipole moment of the electrons is zero because the spins are in up/down pairs. Only atoms with partially filled shells (i.e., unpaired spins) can have a net magnetic moment, so ferromagnetism only occurs in materials with partially filled shells. Because of Hund’s rules, the first few electrons in a shell tend to have the same spin, thereby increasing the total dipole moment. These unpaired dipoles (often called simply “spins” even though they also generally include angular momentum) tend to align in parallel to an external magnetic field, an effect called paramagnetism. Ferromagnetism involves an additional phenomenon, however: The dipoles tend to align spontaneously, giving rise to a spontaneous magnetization, even when there is no applied field. Diamagnetism Diamagnetism is a magnetic response shared by all substances. In response to an applied magnetic field, electrons precess (see Larmor precession), and by Lenz’s law they act to shield the interior of a body from themagnetic field. Thus, the moment produced is in the opposite direction to the field and the susceptibility is negative. This effect is weak but independent of temperature. A substance whose only magnetic response is diamagnetism is called a diamagnet. Paramagnetism Paramagnetism is a weak positive response to a magnetic field due to rotation of electron spins. Paramagnetism occurs in certain kinds of iron-bearing minerals because the iron contains an unpaired electron in one of their shells (see Hund’s rules). Some are paramagnetic down to absolute zero and their susceptibility is inversely proportional to the temperature (see Curie’s law); others are magnetically ordered below a critical temperature and the susceptibility increases as it approaches that temperature (see Curie-Weiss law). Ferromagnetism Collectively, strongly magnetic materials are often referred to as ferromagnets. However, this magnetism can arise as the result of more than one kind of magnetic order. In the strict sense, ferromagnetism refers to magnetic ordering where neighboring electron spins are aligned by the exchange interaction. Below a critical temperature called the Curie temperature, ferromagnets have a spontaneous magnetization and there is hysteresis in their response to a changing magnetic field. Most importantly for rock magnetism, they have remanence, so they can record the Earth’s field. Iron does not occur widely in its pure form. It is usually incorporated into iron oxides, oxyhydroxides and sulfides. In these compounds, the iron atoms are not close enough for direct exchange, so they are coupled by indirect exchange or superexchange. The result is that the crystal lattice is divided into two or more sublattices with different moments. Ferrimagetism Ferrimagnets have two sublattices with opposing moments. One sublattice has a larger moment, so there is a net unbalance. Ferrimagnets often behave like ferromagnets, but the temperature dependence of their spontaneous magnetization can be quite different. Louis Néel identified four types of temperature dependence, one of which involves a reversal of the magnetization. This phenomenon played a role in controversies over marine magnetic anomalies. Antiferromagnetism Antiferromagnets, like ferrimagnets, have two sublattices with opposing moments, but now the moments are equal in magnitude. If the moments are exactly opposed, the magnet has no remanence. However, the moments can be tilted (spin canting), resulting in a moment nearly at right angles to the moments of the sublattices. (Wiki)

Metamagnetism is a blanket term used loosely in physics to describe a sudden (often, dramatic) increase in the magnetization of a material with a small change in an externally applied magnetic field. The metamagnetic behavior may have quite different physical causes for different types of metamagnets. Some examples of physical mechanisms leading to metamagnetic behavior are: Itinerant Metamagnetism – Exchange splitting of the Fermi surface in a paramagnetic system of itinerant electrons causes an energetically favorable transition to bulk magnetization near the transition to a ferromagnet or other magnetically ordered state.  Antiferromagnetic Transition – Field-induced spin flips in antiferromagnets cascade at a critical energy determined by the applied magnetic field. Depending on the material and experimental conditions, metamagnetism may be associated with a first-order phase transition, a continuous phase transition at a critical point(classical or quantum), or crossovers beyond a critical point that do not involve a phase transition at all. These wildly different physical explanations sometimes lead to confusion as to what the term “metamagnetic” is referring in specific cases. (Wiki)

Graphane is a two-dimensional polymer of carbon and hydrogen with the formula unit (CH)n where n is large. Graphane should not be confused with graphene, a two-dimensional form of carbon alone. Graphane is a form of hydrogenated graphene. Graphane’s carbon bonds are in sp3 configuration, as opposed to graphene’s sp2 bond configuration, thus graphane is a two-dimensional analog of cubic diamond. The first theoretical description of graphane was reported in 2003 and its preparation was reported in 2009. Full hydrogenation from both sides of a graphene sheet results in graphane, but partial hydrogenation leads to hydrogenated graphene. If graphene rests on a silica surface, hydrogenation on only one side of graphene preserves the hexagonal symmetry in graphane. One-sided hydrogenation of graphene becomes possible due to the existence of ripplings. Because the latter are distributed randomly, obtained graphane is expected to be disordered material in contrast to two-sided graphane. If Annealing allows the hydrogen to disperse, reverting to graphene. Note: p-doped graphane is postulated to be a high-temperature BCS theory superconductor with a Tc above 90 K. (Wiki)

Surface Layering (quasi-crystalline arrays) Surface layering is a quasi-crystalline structure at the surfaces of otherwise disordered liquids, where atoms or molecules of even the simplest liquid are stratified into well-defined layers parallel to the surface. While in crystalline solids such atomic layers can extend periodically throughout the entire dimension of a crystal, surface layering decays rapidly away from the surface and is limited to just a few near-surface region layers. Another difference between surface layering and crystalline structure is that atoms or molecules of surface-layered liquids are not ordered in-plane, while in crystalline solids they are. Surface layering was predicted theoretically by Stuart Rice at the University of Chicago in 1983 and has been experimentally discovered by Peter Pershan (Harvard) and his group, working in collaboration with Ben Ocko (Brookhaven) and Moshe Deutsch (Bar-Ilan) in 1995 in elemental liquid mercury and liquid gallium using x-ray reflectivity techniques. More recently layering has been shown to arise from electronic properties of metallic liquids, rather than thermodynamic variables such as surface tension, since surfaces of low-surface tension metallic liquids such as liquid potassium are layered, while those of dielectric liquids such as water, are not. (Wiki)

Metamaterials are artificial materials engineered to have properties that may not be found in nature. They are assemblies of multiple individual elements fashioned from conventional microscopic materials such as metals or plastics, but the materials are usually arranged in periodic patterns. Metamaterials gain their properties not from their composition, but from their exactingly-designed structures. Their precise shape, geometry, size, orientation and arrangement can affect the waves of light or sound in an unconventional manner, creating material properties which are unachievable with conventional materials.  These metamaterials achieve desired effects by incorporating structural elements of sub-wavelength sizes, i.e. features that are actually smaller than the wavelength of the waves they affect. (Wiki)

Plasmonic metamaterials are metamaterials that exploit surface plasmons, which are produced from the interaction of light with metal-dielectric materials. Under specific conditions, the incident light couples with the surface plasmons to create self-sustaining, propagating electromagnetic waves known as surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs). Once launched, the SPPs ripple along the metal-dielectric interface and do not stray from this narrow path. Compared with the incident light that triggered the transformation, the SPPs can be much shorter in wavelength. By fabricating such metamaterials fundamental limits tied to the wavelength of light are overcome. Light hitting a metamaterial is transformed into electromagnetic waves of a different variety—surface plasmon polaritons, which are shorter in wavelength than the incident light. This transformation leads to unusual and counterintuitive properties that might be harnessed for practical use. Moreover, new approaches that simplify the fabrication process of metamaterials are under development. This work also includes making new structures specifically designed to enable measurements of the materials novel properties. Furthermore, nanotechnology applications of these nanostructures are currently being researched, including microscopy beyond the diffraction limit. (Wiki)

Dusty Plasmas A dusty plasma is a plasma containing millimeter (10−3) to nanometer (10−9) sized particles suspended in it. Dust particles are charged and the plasma and particles behave as a plasma. Dust particles may form larger particles resulting in “grain plasmas”. Due to the additional complexity of studying plasmas with charged dust particles, dusty plasmas are also known as Complex Plasmas. Dusty plasmas are interesting because the presence of particles significantly alters the charged particle equilibrium leading to different phenomena. It is a field of current research. Electrostatic coupling between the grains can vary over a wide range so that the states of the dusty plasma can change from weakly coupled (gaseous) to crystalline. Such plasmas are of interest as a non-Hamiltonian system of interacting particles and as a means to study generic fundamental physics of self-organization, pattern formation, phase transitions, and scaling. (Wiki)

This brings us to the end of our exploration for now (there will be more of this Wiki series in the near future)

I hope you have enjoyed the trip. When reading the NASA LENR – Cold Fusion Patent after completing this journey,  you may be surprised at the depth of your new insight. Also, please remember, when informing others about LENR – Cold Fusion Energy be sure to tell them… “Explore beyond the surface of ‘Wikipedia Cold Fusion’ and take a journey into the depths of Wiki science.”

Thanks,

Greg Goble

 

HEY! Visit http://lenr-canr.org/ This site features a library of papers on LENR, Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, also known as Cold Fusion. (CANR, Chemically Assisted Nuclear Reactions is another term for this phenomenon.) The library includes more than 1,000 original scientific papers reprinted with permission from the authors and publishers. The papers are linked to a bibliography of over 3,500 journal papers, news articles, and books (they even have  few quality encyclopedia articles) about LENR Science and Engineering… Popularly known as ‘cold fusion’ now… Forever historically speaking that is.

 

NEXT

LENR Sister Field – Thermoelectric Energy

Soon I will take us back in time to the field of invention of Harold Aspden, the father of efficient thermoelectric energy devices; the likes of which power NASA deep space probes. Key words in his breakthrough patent are worth noting as they are common to the science and the environment of cold fusion phenomenon. Harold Aspden was fascinated by cold fusion as well as the biological transmutation of elements, seeing them as relevant to his field… the science of thermoelectric energy conversion.

 

NASA Technology Gateway – Spinoff – LENR Cold Fusion

 

The Technology Gateway and Spinoff Magazine by NASA

Congress mandates that NASA offer licensing of patented technologies to U.S. industry. NASA meets this requirement through the NASA Technology Gateway where LENR patent licensing opportunities are offered. NASA publishes Spinoff magazine annually, showcasing the technologies from previous years’ licensing process, and their benefits to industry.

The Technology Transfer and Partnership Program

 A place to purchase LENR technology

Why is it important for Langley Research Center (LaRC) to transfer its technology?
“The U.S. Congress and the NASA Administrator are putting great emphasis on transferring NASA-developed technology and expertise to U.S. industry to increase U.S. industrial competitiveness, create jobs, and improve the balance of trade. In addition, there is an emphasis on bringing technologies and expertise into NASA that can facilitate achievement of space program goals.”

To purchase licensing agreements for LENR, go to the  NASA Technology Gateway – link .

NASA Technologies Benefiting Society (Spinoff 2012-pdf pg 34)

Since its founding, NASA has been charged, not only with expanding humanity’s reach into space and its knowledge of the universe, but also with finding ways for the technology it develops to benefit the Nation and world. NASA research and development has tangible, secondary benefits beyond supporting mission needs—creating jobs, generating revenue for businesses large and small, reducing costs, and saving lives. Through software innovations, fuel-saving capabilities for small aircraft, healthy beverages at your local grocery store, and more—NASA spin-offs are improving daily life in your hometown and beyond.

 

The NASA Technology Gateway is for technologies in the applied engineering research phase entering the marketplace.

What patented LENR energy technology does NASA have to offer for licensing purchase?

Who is purchasing LENR technology at the Technology Gateway?

NASA and LENR Applied Engineering

Has LENR advanced to the applied engineering and product development phase? Yes.

At the Technology Gateway, NASA is promoting LENR power technology.

Langley’s Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) Technology AvailableNASA

“Check out our latest video on our homepage featuring a novel, clean energy technology.”

View the Promotional Video

Method for Enhancement of Surface Plasmon Polaritons to Initiate and Sustain LENR in MHS

(Metal Hydride Systems) – NASA

A quote from the end of the video: “NASA’s method for enhancement of surface plasmon polaritons to initiate and sustain low energy nuclear reactions in metal hydride systems, a clean nuclear energy for your power operated technology.”

MORE

These also provide evidence that LENR has advanced to applied engineering and product development.

  • In the document “Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: The Realism and Outlook”—NASA links—Dennis Bushnell Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center states that “We are still far from the theoretical limits of the weak interaction physics for LENR performance and are in fact inventing (in real time) the requisite engineering, along with verifying the physics.
  • In this NASA contract, pdf- “Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research – Phase II” – N+4 Advanced Concept – NASA Contract NNL08AA16B – NNL11AA00T, the Working Group report from May 2012 states:

    Even though we do not know the specific cost of the LENR itself, we assumed a cost of jet fuel at $4/gallon and weight based aircraft cost. We were able to calculate cost per mile for the LENR equipped aircraft compared to a conventional aircraft (Figure 3.2). Looking at the plots, one could select a point where the projected cost per mile is 33% less than a conventionally powered aircraft.”… pg 24.

  • LENR Requirements Analysis… pg 24. View Figure 3.1

  • Potential Heat Engines for LENR Systems… pg 25. View Figure 3.2

  • Parametric LENR and Heat Engine Performance Parameters… pg 25. View Figure 6.2

  • Low Energy Nuclear Reactor Technologies …pg 82.

  • LENR Technologies Success Criteria …pg 86.

  • Also LENR at pgs 15, 18, 19, 20, and 21.

  • The NASA Working Group Report also makes public the following list of organizations and individuals working on the advanced concept contract: Bradley (Boeing) * Daggett (Boeing) * Droney (Boeing) * Hoisington (Boeing) * Kirby (GT) * Murrow (GE) * Ran (GT) * Nam (GT) * Tai, (GT) * Hammel (GE) * Perullo (GT) * Guynn (NASA) * Olson (NASA) * Leavitt (NASA) * Allen (Boeing) * Cotes (Boeing) * Guo  (Boeing) * Foist (Boeing) * Rawdon (Boeing) * Wakayama (Boeing) * Dallara (Boeing) * Kowalski (Boeing) * Wat (Boeing) * Robbana (Boeing) * Barmichev (Boeing) * Fink (Boeing) * Sankrithi (Boeing) * White (Boeing) * Gowda (GE) * Brown (NASA) * Wahls (NASA) * Wells  (NASA) * Jeffries (FAA) * Felder (NASA) * Schetz (VT) * Burley (NASA) * Sequiera (FAA) * Martin (NASA) * Kapania (VT)

Thank you NASA, and a thank you to all of the people and organizations who worked on developing the NASA, “LENR equipped aircraft” – Advanced Concepts Working Group Report. Each of them are aware of the opportunities offered by patented LENR energy technology from NASA.

How much money might NASA make through the licensing of LENR technology?

THE NASA LENR ENERGY PATENT

The NASA LENR patent is for a device to produce heavy electrons thereby sustaining LENR and ensuing energy generation. In  this slideshow, a Widom Larson theorist reviews the NASA patent. “NASA files USPTO patent application on LENRs” slideshow – by Lewis B. Larson.

View and research at Google Patent Search: Titled, “Method for Creating Heavy Electrons” or download the (pdf at lenr-canr.org)

Method For Creating Heavy Electrons – NASA LENR Patent

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT [0002] The invention was made by an employee of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.

  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] 1. Field of the Invention [0004] This invention relates to the production of heavy electrons. More specifically, the invention is a method of making a device, the device itself a device, and a system using the device to produce heavy electrons via the sustained propagation of surface plasmon polaritons at a selected frequency.
  • ABSTRACT A method for producing heavy electrons is based on a material system that includes an electrically-conductive material is selected. The material system has a resonant frequency associated therewith for a given operational environment. A structure is formed that includes a non-electrically-conductive material  and the material system. The structure incorporates the electrically-conductive material at least at a surface thereof. The geometry of the structure supports propagation of surface plasmon polaritons at a selected frequency that is approximately equal to the resonant frequency of the material system. As a result, heavy electrons are produced at the electrically-conductive material as the surface plasmon polaritons propagate along the structure.
  • [0019] A method for selective enhancement of surface plasmon polaritons to initiate and sustain low energy reaction in material systems, comprising the steps of: providing a material system comprising an electrically-conductive material, said material system having a resonant frequency associated therewith for a given operational environment; and forming a structure having a surface, said structure comprising a non-electrically-conductive material and said material system, said structure incorporating said electrically-conductive material at least at said surface of said structure, wherein a geometry of said structure supports propagation of surface plasmon polaritons at a selected frequency that is approximately equal to said resonant frequency of said material system, and applying energy to a portion of said structure to induce propagation of said surface plasmon polaritons at said portion, wherein heavy electrons are produced at said material system as said surface plasmon polaritons propagate along said structure.
  • [0028] The above-described tuned structure -14- incorporating material system -12- can exist as particles, in two-dimensional geometries, three-dimensional geometries, and even fractal geometries. Several non-limiting examples will be discussed below.
  • [0029] Individual particles, by themselves, are the simplest embodiment of a material system used by the present invention. Spherical or nearly spherical particles naturally resonate at a frequency where the particle circumference is equal to a multiple of the SPP wavelength. Similarly, long and thin, needle-like particles or whiskers can resonate in modes analogous to small antenna when the length of the particle is an integer multiple of one-half the SPP wavelength.
  • [0030] Two-dimensional embodiments are comprised of periodic textures or arrayed structures that, by design, resonate at specific SPP frequencies. Examples include triangular, rectangular, or hexagonal arrays of posts (e.g., cylinders, truncated cones, or derivatives of these with more complex, non-circular bases) where the array of objects creates and reinforces a natural SPP resonance at the desired frequency either in the array elements themselves or on the surface in the voids between array elements.
  • 0032] The advantages of the present invention are numerous. Devices/systems made in accordance with the present invention control the frequency of the SPP resonance and its uniformity over large surface or volume regions.
  • This will allow an entire device to participate in heavy electron production and ensuing energy generation.
  • The present invention is adaptable to a variety of physical states/geometries and is scalable in size…
  • …thereby making it available for energy production in a wide variety of applications (e.g., hand-held and large scale electronics, automobiles, aircraft, surface ships, electric power generation, rockets, etc.)

 

In the Next Year or So, a NASA Spinoff LENR Report?

So, who is purchasing LENR technology from NASA at the Technology Gateway?

Spinoff Magazine will, at some time, report the LENR licensing agreements that are taking place.

When? Perhaps in next years’ edition, or so.

NASA… Spinoff… LENR…

Cold Fusion Now!

 

METHOD  of  SCIENTIFIC

Straighten…. untangling

Concept… bound

Better… yet

Always… found

Still.. questing

 

 

Top