Synopsis of recent Finnish patent application

THERMAL-ENERGY PRODUCING SYSTEM AND METHOD

Patent to be issued to Etiam Oy. Inventor: Pekka Soininen

The invention proposes to produce thermal energy in a reaction chamber from “nanoscale particle accelerators” and a nano-powder catalyst material used for promoting the formation and storage of condensed Rydberg matter.

The particle accelerators are composed of a metal material (usually powdered Ni) capable of conducting electricity, absorbing hydrogen atoms in the interstitial spaces in the metal lattice forming a metal hydride, and a dielectric material (electric field creator usually in powdered form) capable of being polarized. The nanoparticles accelerators create, enhance and focus localized electric fields and thus accelerate hydrogen ions and electrons.

The catalytic nano-powders allow for the formation and storage of Rydberg matter and inverted Rydberg matter in the same reaction chamber where the nanoscale particle accelerators are producing high-energy electrons and protons. Quantum tunneling allows high-energy protons to overcome the Coulomb barrier, which then allows nuclear fusion to take place between the protons and lattice atoms. The Rydberg matter and inverted Rydberg matter formed by local low-level electric fields condense to form condensed Rydberg matter, which when exploded by high intensity electric fields provide additional protons that increase the probability that fusion with lattice atoms takes place with the release of additional energy.

It appears that the invention itself depends on the efficacy of the reactions posited above. There appear to be two kinds of processes at work. Each process appears to produce protons, which then produce excess heat by tunneling through the Coulomb barrier, each helping the other to make the tunneling process more efficient in producing heat energy. If the inventor has a working model and that model produces energy consistent with the nuclear reactions indicated in the patent, there may actually be some credence to the claims made. This approach to explaining LENR theory is new to me and may IMO have some merit.

The inventor explains in some detail realizations of the specific materials used in the reaction chamber. These materials may be similar to those used by Rossi and Defkalion.

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=WO&NR=2013076378A2&KC=A2&FT=D&ND=3&date=20130530&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

NAVY LENR Patent Granted – Transmutes Radioactive Waste

This U.S. Navy patent transmutes radioactive elements into less harmful elements through a benign “cold fusion” low energy nuclear reaction process. The patent was granted April 16, 2013 for a device and method that shortens the half-life of radioactive materials by increasing their rate of emissions. The process creates high pressure steam for the turbines eliminating the need for refueling of existing nuclear reactor cores.

I took a look at the U.S. Navy SPAWAR technology transfer site.

The search I made on July 9th, 2013, yielded this posted July 3rd, 2013 by the U.S Navy SPAWAR Technology Transfer folks.

The U.S. Navy LENR patent is listed under Physical Chemistry. Oddly enough, it is not listed under Radiation and Nuclear Chemistry.

This technology is now available for licensing purchase here.

Physical Chemistry

8419919: “System and Method for Generating Particles”

SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific – Technology Transfer

  • SSC Pacific currently has over 600 pieces of intellectual property (patents, patent applications, and Navy invention disclosures). Many of these properties are available for licensing through Patent License Agreements (PLAs).

  • PLAs allow companies to commercially exploit SSC Pacific-developed technology. Royalty rights, legal rights, and other terms and conditions on the use of the technology are negotiated by the company and SSC Pacific. The licensee gains the technical knowledge and financial benefits of the Government intellectual property. SSC Pacific retains the rights to use the technology for Government purposes. 

  • Licensees must complete and submit an Application for License to Practice Invention (pdf) and a commercialization plan (in essence, a business plan). These two items are a statutory requirement to license SSC Pacific technologies. If submitting the application and commercialization plan together, many of the answers on the application can refer back to the commercialization plan.

  • PLAs can be partially exclusive or nonexclusive. The partially exclusive license agreement is, in essence, an exclusive license agreement with the exception of the Government having rights. See the SSC Pacific Partially Exclusive PLA Template (pdf) for more information on what a partially exclusive PLA entails. Licensees may work with employees of SSC Pacific to further develop or test the technology through a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA). (link)

  • Visit our technologies page (link)  to browse/search SSC Pacific technologies available for licensing or contact us (here) for more information.

In light of the continuing radioactive disasters at Fukushima and at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation facility. In light of the danger of nuclear reactors and the on site storage of spent fuel rods. In order to bring an end to nuclear fuel use. This Navy LENR technology, research and applied engineering, should be fast tracked and brought into the international field for further development. Licensing agreements for use of this technology to be distributed widely. Environmental remediation and avoidance of nuclear catastrophes is our foremost priority.

Studying the patent, I can not help but observe that this is an advanced LENR concept. The Navy has been working on this for quite some time. The patent was filed in 2007. We get to view it six years later. Now that this publicly funded research work is finally seen, it should be brought into the spotlight of the world stage immediately.

International and National lobby groups will be formed to do so.

Demand It from the Navy

COLD FUSION NOW! 

System and Method for Generating Particles – US8419919 B1

United States Navy Patent

Cold Fusion LENR Energy

Publication number – US8419919 B1

  • Publication type – Grant

  • Application number – 11/859,499

  • Publication date – Apr 16, 2013

  • Filing date – Sep 21, 2007

Inventors

Original Assignee

  • The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy

  • And Jwk International Corporation – see (wikicorp) or (company link)

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME EMBODIMENTS

  • Particles are generated from the application of method. As used herein, the term “generated” is used to refer to the forming of particles through a process involving chemical and, depending upon the substrate, magnetic interaction.

  • Examples of the types of particles generated and detected may include, but are not limited to: alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, energetic protons, deuterons, tritons, and neutrons. The particles generated by the implementations of method may have various applications.

  • For example, the generated particles may be captured by other nuclei to create new elements, may be used to remediate nuclear waste, may be used to create strategic materials, or may be used to treat cancerous tumors.

  • As an example there are some sites that have groundwater that is contaminated with radionuclides, such as technetium, Tc-99. The particles emitted by electrochemical cell may be absorbed by the radionuclide, Tc-99 via neutron capture, transmuting it to Tc-100 with a half life of 15.8 seconds to Ru-100, which is stable where the reaction is shown by 99Tc43(n,γ)100Tc43 and the 100Tc43 β− decays to 100Ru44 with a half-life of 15.8 seconds.

RELATED POSTS

E- Cat World article April 23, 2013

USPTO Grants Patent for System for ‘Generating Particles’

Follow Navy LENR part II

“Transmutes Radioactive Wastes Now U.S. Navy and LENR Energy”

Includes U.S. Navy LENR technology patent filed in Europe

A LENR Hybrid Fusion Fission Reactor

The Global Energy Corporation GeNie Reactor

Advantages of the embodiment of the invention:

  • [014] It may be an advantage of one or more of the embodiments of the invention to provide a safer nuclear reactor.

  • [015] Another advantage of one or more of the embodiments may be to provide a nuclear reactor with an internal source of fast neutrons.

  • [016] Another advantage of one or more of the embodiments may be to provide a nuclear reactor that operates with fertile or fissile fuel.

  • [017] A further advantage of one or more of the embodiments may be to provide a nuclear reactor that consumes its own nuclear waste products.

  • [018] A further advantage of one or more of the embodiments may be to provide a means to fission spent fuel rods.

  • [019] Yet another advantage of one or more of the embodiments may be to co-generate heat while consuming nuclear fission products and unspent nuclear fuel.

  • [020] Still yet another advantage of one or more of the embodiments may be to co-generate power from a conventional steam/water cycle

  • [021] Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following descriptions, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein, by way of illustration and example, an embodiment of the present invention is disclosed.

Follow Navy LENR part III

“Energy Shortage – LENR Cold Fusion – Navy Guam”

  • Presented MONDAY, 13  FEB  2012

  • THE Consolidated Commission on Utilities and the Guam Power Authority are investigating a new type of “generation five” nuclear power generator – one that could potentially reduce power costs for Guam ratepayers by half or more.

  • The Variety has learned Dr. Jay W. Khim, CEO of Global Energy Corp. (GEC) based in Annandale, Va., made a presentation to the utilities commission, GPA officials and Navy engineers last month and will make another tomorrow afternoon.

  • CCU member Eloy Hara, who says he is “spearheading” the project on behalf of GEC, told Variety: “After the presentation that Dr. Khim gave to the CCU and the Guam power management team, and almost an hour-long discussion afterward … we were all awed by the technology.

Follow Navy LENR part IV

“Mineta, Davis, Carlucci Global Energy Corporation LENR Navy Guam”

“You have to change the basic science of nuclear power,” Khim explained. “We’ve been working with the U.S. Navy for about 22 years and the basic science phase is now over.

Now we’re going into commercial development, which the Navy is not going to do.” But Khim says the science has been repeatedly duplicated by the Navy, and has been proven, recognized and published.

Officials of the Navy on Guam, including Capt. John V. Heckmann Jr., CO of Naval Facilities and a professional engineer, attended the GEC briefing.

The GEC board of directors, Khim says, includes some well-known Washington D.C. Players, including former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci, former Congressman and Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, and former U.S. Congressman Tom Davis, among others.

IN LIGHT OF THIS The Cold Fusion Now

LOVE IN SCIENCE AWARD

Goes to

Edward Esko

Quantum Rabbit

Infinite Energy Magazine

And the New Energy Foundation

LENR-Induced Transmutation of Nuclear Waste

INFINITE ENERGY • ISSUE 104 • JULY/AUGUST 2012

 

Edward Esko

  • Abstract —

  • Quantum Rabbit (QR) research on the low-energy fusion and fission (low-energy nuclear reactions, or LENR) of various elements indicates possible pathways for applying that process to reducing nuclear materials.

  • In a New Energy Foundation (NEF)-funded test conducted at Quantum Rabbit lab in Owls Head, Maine, QR researchers initiated a possible low-energy fission reaction in which 204Pb fissioned into 7 Li and 197Au (204Pb → 7 Li + 197Au).1

  • This reaction may have been triggered by a low-energy fusion reaction in which 7 Li fused with 32S to form 39K (7 Li + 32S →19K).

  • These results confirmed earlier findings showing apparent low-energy fusion and fission reactions.2 Moreover, subsequent research with boron indicates apparent low-energy fusion reactions in which boron fuses with oxygen to form aluminum and with sulfur to form scandium.3

  • At the same time, the QR group has achieved what appear to be low-energy transmutations of carbon using carbon-arc under vacuum and in open air.4

  • The research group at QR believes these processes can be adapted to accelerate the natural decay cycle of uranium-235, plutonium-239, radium-226 and the fission products cesium-137, iodine-129, technetium-99 and strontium-90 with the long-term potential of reducing the threat posed by radioactive isotopes to human health and the environment.

NAVY LENR Summary

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME EMBODIMENTS

  • FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of an implementation of a method for generating particles 10. One implementation of method 10 may utilize an electrochemical cell 100 as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. As such, method 10 will be discussed with reference to electrochemical cell 100. Method 10 may be performed at conditions of ambient temperature and standard atmospheric pressure. Method 10 may begin at step 20, where a current may be supplied to the electrodes of an electrochemical cell according to a first charging profile. For example, step 20 may involve supplying current to the positive electrode, anode 130, and the negative electrode, cathode 132, of electrochemical cell 100. Current may be supplied to anode 130 and cathode 132 by connecting a galvanostat/potentiostat 140 to anode 130 and cathode 132. Step 20 is discussed in further detail with regard to FIG. 2. Following step 20, method 10 may proceed to step 30. Step 30 may involve maintaining a generally constant current between the positive and negative electrodes during the first charging profile such that deposition of metal 172 on the cathode occurs in the presence of evolving deuterium gas during electrolysis of an electrolytic solution. As an example, step 30 may involve maintaining a generally constant current between the anode 130 and cathode 132 during the first charging profile. Maintaining a generally constant current serves to ensure that deposition of metal 172 that substantially absorbs deuterium on cathode 132 occurs in the presence of evolving deuterium gas 174 during electrolysis of electrolytic solution 170 (see FIG. 5). A generally constant current may be defined as current that is stable, but that may have minor fluctuations. Step 30 may be performed by connecting a galvanostat/potentiostat 140 to anode 130 and cathode 132.
  • Method 10 may next proceed to step 40, where electrochemical cell 100 may be exposed to an external field, such as a magnetic field. For example, step 40 may be performed by positioning magnets 160 and 162 opposite one another on opposing sides of electrochemical cell 100 (see FIGS. 4 and 5). Step 40 may occur during the deposition of the metal on the cathode. In other embodiments, step 40 may occur after the termination of the deposition of the metal on the cathode. The determination that the deposition of the metal on the cathode has terminated may be made by a visual inspection that the plating solution within electrolytic solution 170 has turned from a red-brown color to clear. The plating solution turns clear when metal has all been plated onto cathode 132. Method 10 may then proceed to step 50, where a current may be supplied to the electrodes according to a second charging profile during the exposure of the electrochemical cell to the external field. For example, step 50 may involve using a power source to supply a current to anode 130 and cathode 132 according to a second charging profile during the exposure of electrochemical cell 100 to an external magnetic field (not shown).
  • Particles are generated from the application of method 10. As used herein, the term “generated” is used to refer to the forming of particles through a process involving chemical and, depending upon the substrate, magnetic interaction. Examples of the types of particles generated and detected may include, but are not limited to: alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, energetic protons, deuterons, tritons, and neutrons. The particles generated by the implementations of method 10 may have various applications.
  • Government DOE control of LENR since 1989. 

  • Technology quietly announced July 3rd, 2013.

  • When few would be watching.

  • Years before 2007… They knew of LENR nuclear remediation. 

  • We were not allowed to have this knowledge

  • They did not share it. They hid it.

  • A Low key Manhattan Project – Few research papers.

  • U.S. Patent sequestered for almost six years.

  • No SPAWAR ICCF presentation of nuclear waste remediation.

  • No SPAWAR presentation of LENR nuclear waste remediation at THE ASME – ICEM2013 15th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT. 

  • U.S. LENR reactor patent was quietly filed in Europe 2008. 

  • Company attempted to quietly launch  in Guam 2012.

  • GEC pitched it as a fast breeder reactor. No mention of LENR Technology or Breakthrough Cold Fusion Science.

  • Even more evidence of covert acts and collusion.

  • Technology listed as physical chemistry, not as a nuclear technology.

  • 2112 GeNie presentation in Guam.  

  • 2012 SPAWAR ICCF presentation.

  • Compare the two. No mention of GeNie at ICCF 2012.

  • GeNie LOW COST Guam Powerplant. 50MW – $250 million

  • Guam reactor to be fueled with fresh uranium.

  • Not transmuting nuclear waste.

  • Not ending nuclear reactor refueling.

  • No presentation planned for 2013 ICCF.

  • COLD FUSION NOW !!

  • Remediation of nuclear waste NOW!!

  • End refueling of nuclear reactors NOW!!

  • Lower our risk factor for nuclear catastrophes NOW!!

  • This technology was hidden!

  • Absolutely without a doubt!

  • For example, the generated particles may be captured by other nuclei to create new elements, may be used to remediate nuclear waste, may be used to create strategic materials, or may be used to treat cancerous tumors.

  • As an example there are some sites that have groundwater that is contaminated with radionuclides, such as technetium, Tc-99.

  • The particles emitted by electrochemical cell 100 may be absorbed by the radionuclide, Tc-99 via neutron capture, transmuting it to Tc-100 with a half life of 15.8 seconds to Ru-100, which is stable where the reaction is shown by .sup.99Tc.sub.43(n,.gamma.).sup.100Tc.sub.43 and the .sup.100Tc.sub.43 .beta..sup.- decays to .sup.100Ru.sub.44 with a half-life of 15.8 seconds.

  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of an implementation of step 20 of method 10. Step 20 may include more than one current level and more than one time period, wherein each of the current levels is supplied across the anode and the cathode for one of the time periods. Step 20 may be performed to assure good adherence of the palladium, a deuterium absorbing metal, to cathode 132, which may be a wire having a length of 2 cm and a diameter of 0.5 cm. Step 20 may involve low current densities for adhering the palladium to cathode 132. As an example, step 20 may begin at step 22, where a reducing current of 100 .mu.A may be supplied to the anode and cathode for a time period of about twenty-four hours. Next, step 24 may involve supplying a reducing current of 200 .mu.A to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about forty-eight hours. Step 20 may then proceed to step 26, where a reducing current of 500 .mu.A may be supplied to anode 130 and cathode 132 until the completion of the deposition process. The completion of the deposition process will occur when the plating solution appears clear as described above. As an example, the amount of time required for the completion of the deposition process may be between approximately 3 and 7 days, depending upon the surface area of cathode 132 and the first charging profile used.
  • As current is applied, Pd is deposited on the cathode. Electrochemical reactions occurring at the cathode include: Pd.sup.2++2e.sup.-Pd.sup.0 D.sub.2O+e.sup.-D.sup.0.+-.OD.sup.- (Eq. 1) Once formed, the D.sup.0 is either absorbed by the Pd or binds to another D.sup.0 to form a deuterium molecule, D.sub.2. At standard temperature and pressure, D.sub.2 is a gas. The result is that metallic Pd is deposited on the cathode in the presence of evolving D.sub.2.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart of an implementation of step 50 of method 10. Step 50 may be performed to load metal 172 on cathode 132 with deuterium. In one embodiment, step 50 may involve more than one current levels and more than one time periods, wherein each of the current levels is supplied across the anode and the cathode for one of the time periods. In one embodiment, step 50 may involve levels of increasing current density to load the palladium lattice with deuterium such that the ratio of deuterium to palladium is .gtoreq.1. As an example, one implementation of step 50 may begin at step 52, where a current of 1 mA is supplied to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about two hours. Next, step 54 may involve supplying a current of 2 mA to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about six hours. Next, step 56 may involve supplying a current of 5 mA to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about twenty-four hours. Next, step 58 may involve supplying a current of 10 mA to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about twenty-four hours. Next, step 60 may involve supplying a current of 25 mA to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about twenty-four hours. Next, step 62 may involve supplying a current of 50 mA to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about twenty-four hours. Next, step 64 may involve supplying a current of 75 mA to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about twenty-four hours. Finally, step 66 may involve supplying a current of 100 mA to anode 130 and cathode 132 for a time period of about twenty-four hours.
  • Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, electrochemical cell 100 may include an electrolytic solution 170, an anode 130, and a cathode 132. Electrolytic solution 170 may comprise a metallic salt having a first metal that substantially absorbs deuterium when reduced to an atomic state, and a supporting electrolyte, each dissolved in heavy water. As an example, the metallic salt may be selected from the group of transition metals, such as palladium. In one embodiment, where the deuterium atoms bind to one another to create deuterium gas, the reduced metal 172, such as palladium, absorbs deuterium 174. In another embodiment, as shown in FIG. 5, gaseous deuterium atoms collect on the surface of cathode 132 and enter into the lattice of metal 172 when in a reduced state. In one implementation, electrolytic solution 170 comprises 20-25 mL solution of 0.03 M palladium chloride and 0.3 M lithium chloride in deuterated water.
  • Cathode 132 may be partially immersed in electrolytic solution 170. Cathode 132 may comprise a second metal that does not substantially absorb deuterium 174 and is generally stable in electrolytic solution 170 when cathode 132 is polarized. For example, cathode 132 may be comprised of Au, Ag, Pt, as well as their alloys. In some embodiments, cathode 132 may comprise a second metal that does absorb deuterium 174 and is generally stable in electrolytic solution 170 when cathode 132 is polarized. As an example, cathode 132 may be comprised of Ni or its alloys. Cathode 132 may be formed into various shapes, such as a wire, rod, screen, or foil. In some embodiments, cathode 132 may be shaped as a wire having a diameter of 0.25 mm and a length of 2.5 cm. Anode 130 may also be partially immersed in electrolytic solution 170 and may be stable in electrolytic solution 170 when anode 130 is polarized. Anode 130 may be manufactured from any electrically conductive material which is stable in electrolytic solution 170, such as Pt, as well as their alloys. The term “stable” with reference to anode 130 and cathode 132 means that the materials employed in the construction of anode 130 and cathode 132 do not substantially corrode when they are polarized and generally do not react with the electrolyte or products of electrolysis. Anode 130 may be formed into various shapes, such as a wire, rod, screen, or foil. As an example, anode 130 may be shaped as a wire having a diameter of 0.25 mm and a length of 30 cm.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a front perspective view of an embodiment of a system 100 for generating particles using an external magnetic field. System 100 may include an electrochemical cell 110, power supply 140, and magnets 160. Cell 110 may include a body portion 120 and a top portion 122. Cell 110 may be rectangular, square, cylindrical, cubical, or various other shapes as recognized in the art. Cell 110, an example of which is commercially available from Ridout Plastics, model AMAC, part number 752, may be comprised of various non-metallic materials that do not react with the electrolyte, such as butyrate. Body portion 120 may be configured to contain an electrolytic solution 170 (see FIG. 5). As an example, body portion 120 may be cubic in shape and may be comprised of a non-conductive material, such as plastic. Top portion 122 may be configured to cover body portion 120. Top portion 120 may be comprised of a non-conductive material, such as plastic. Top portion 122 may contain an opening 124 therein where an anode 130 may be passed therethrough, and also an opening 126 where a cathode 132 may be passed therethrough. Top portion 122 may also contain an opening 128 for venting purposes.
  • Anode 130 may comprise a wire mounted on a support 150 and may be partially immersed in electrolytic solution 170 (see FIG. 5). Support 150 may be comprised of a chemically inert material, such as polyethylene. Cathode 132 may be shaped as a single wire (as shown in FIG. 7A), a screen (as shown in FIG. 7B), or a foil (as shown in FIG. 7C). One end 131 of anode 130 may be connected to power supply 140. One end 133 of cathode 132 may be connected to power supply 140. Power supply 140 may be a potentiostat/galvanostat, an example of which is commercially available from Princeton Applied Research, model 363. The other end 135 of anode 130 may be coupled to a support 150 (see FIG. 5), which may be secured to body portion 120. Cathode 132 may be coupled to a particle detector 152 that may be attached to body portion 120. Both particle detector 152 and cathode 132 may be mounted to body portion 120. In one embodiment, particle detector 152 may be contiguous with cathode 132. In another embodiment, detector 152 may be in proximity to cathode 132, such that particles emitted from cathode 132 may contact particle detector 152. For example, particle detector 152 may be positioned adjacent to cathode 132. As another example, particle detector 152 may be positioned between cathode 132 and body portion 120. Particle detector 152 may be used to detect the occurrence of particles.
  • Particle detector 152 may be comprised of a non-metallic material. In one implementation, particle detector 152 may be comprised of CR-39 material. CR-39 is a thermoset resin that is chemically resistant to the electrolyte and to electromagnetic noise. CR-39 may be commercially obtained from Landauer. Particle detector 152 may comprise various shapes. As an example, particle detector 152 may be rectangular in shape with dimensions of 1 cm.times.2 cm.times.1 mm. When traversing a plastic material such as CR-39, particles create along their ionization track a region that is more sensitive to chemical etching than the rest of the material. After treatment with an etching agent, tracks remain as holes or pits that may be seen with the aid of an optical microscope. The size, depth of penetration, and shape of the tracks provides information about the mass, charge, energy, and direction of motion of particles generated by method 10. Neutral particles, like neutrons, will produce knock-ons, or charged particles resulting from the collision with the neutron that will leave ionization tracks, or, with sufficient energy (e.g. >12 MeV) cause .sup.12C present in the CR-39 resin to fission into 3 charged .alpha. particles that will leave ionization tracks.
  • Magnets 160 and 162 may be positioned adjacent to body portion 120 such that a magnetic field is created within electrochemical cell 100 between anode 130 and cathode 132 and though electrolytic solution 170. In some embodiments, the magnetic field created between magnets 160 and 162 may be sufficient to hold magnets 160 and 162 in position adjacent to body portion 120. In other embodiments, magnets 160 and 162 may be attached to body portion 120. Magnet 160 may be positioned adjacent to the surface of body portion 120 that contacts support 150. Magnet 162 may be positioned adjacent to the surface of body portion 120 that contacts detector 152. Magnets 160 and 162 may be comprised of various magnetic materials, such as NeFeB. As an example, the dimensions of magnets 160 and 162 may be 1 in.times.1 in.times.0.25 in. Magnets 160 and 162 may be commercially obtained from Dura Magnetics, part number NS-10010025. As an example, the external magnetic field created by magnets 160 and 162 may have a magnetic flux between about 1800 and 2200 Gauss. Magnets 160 and 162 may be permanent magnets or may be electromagnets.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a cross-section view of a cell 110 during a co-deposition process. As shown, cell 110 is connected to power supply 140 and includes electrolytic solution 170 therein. Electrolytic solution 170 may comprise a soluble metallic salt (not shown) having a first metal, such as palladium, and a supporting electrolyte (not shown), wherein the palladium and chlorine are combined to form a palladium chloride complex anion, PdCl.sub.4.sup.-. The palladium chloride complex anion may be dissolved in heavy water (D.sub.2O) (not shown), with the palladium absorbing deuterium 174 when in a reduced state. The supporting electrolyte may include an ionizable salt to increase solution conductivity. Examples of ionizable salts may include: alkali metal chlorides, nitrates, and perchlorates. In one embodiment, electrolytic solution 170 may be comprised of a metallic salt such as 0.05 M PdCl.sub.2 and a salt such as 0.3 M LiCl dissolved in 99.9 percent pure heavy water. During the co-deposition process, metal 172 infused with deuterium 174 may be deposited on cathode 132, while oxygen 176 accumulates around anode 130.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a cross-section view of an embodiment of a system 200 for generating particles using an external electric field. System 200 may include an electrochemical cell 210, power supply 240, and external electrodes 260 and 262. Cell 210 may include a body portion 220 and a top portion 222. Top portion may contain an opening 224 (not shown) therein where an anode 230 may be passed there through, and also an opening 226 (not shown) where a cathode 232 may be passed there through. Top portion 222 may also contain an opening 228 (not shown) for venting purposes. Cell 210 may be rectangular, square, cylindrical, or various other shapes as recognized in the art. Cell 210 may be comprised of various non-metallic materials, such as butyrate. Anode 230 and cathode 232 may be connected to power supply 240. Power supply 240 may be a potentiostat or a galvanostat. Anode 230 is attached to a support 250. Cathode 232 may be coupled to a particle detector 254 that is attached to a support 256. Particle detector 254 may be comprised of a non-conductive material. In one implementation, particle detector 254 is comprised of CR-39 material.
  • Electrodes 260 and 262 may be positioned adjacent to body portion 220 such that an electric field may be created between anode 230 and cathode 232. In some embodiments, electrodes 260 and 262 may be secured to body portion 220 by an adhesive. Electrodes 260 and 262 are positioned adjacent to the surface of body portion 220 perpendicular to anode 230 and cathode 232. Electrodes 260 and 262 may be comprised of various conductive materials as recognized by one with ordinary skill in the art, such as copper. As an example, electrodes 260 and 262 may be less than one inch in diameter. Electrode 260 may be connected to a regulated high voltage source 264 via wire 266, whereas electrode 262 may be connected to regulated high voltage source 264 via wire 268. Wires 266 and 268 may comprise any suitable electrical wire as recognized by one with ordinary skill in the art. An example of a voltage source 264 that may be utilized with system 200 is voltage source model 4330, which may be commercially obtained from EMCO. Voltage source 264 may be used to apply 6000V DC (with about 6% AC component) across electrodes 260 and 262.
  • Electrochemical cell 210 includes an electrolytic solution 270. Electrolytic solution 270 may comprise a metallic salt having a first metal that substantially absorbs deuterium when in a reduced state (not shown), and a supporting electrolyte (not shown), each dissolved in heavy water (not shown). As an example, the metallic salt may be selected from the group of transition metals, such as palladium. In one embodiment, where the deuterium atoms bind to one another to create deuterium gas, the reduced deuterium absorbing metal 272, such as palladium, absorbs deuterium 274. In another embodiment, deuterium atoms collect on the surface of cathode 232 and enter into the lattice of deuterium absorbing metal 272 when in a reduced state. In one implementation, electrolytic solution 270 comprises 20-25 mL solution of 0.03 M palladium chloride and 0.3 M lithium chloride in deuterated water.
  • Referring to FIGS. 7A-7C, FIG. 7A shows a front view of one side of an embodiment of system 100, illustrating an embodiment of the cathode 132. As shown, cathode 132 is attached to detector 152. In this implementation, cathode 132 consists of a wire 134. As an example of a commercially available wire 134, may be obtained from Aldrich, Au wire part number 326534 or Pt wire part number 349402. The cathode may be 0.25 mm in diameter, and be 3 cm in length. FIG. 7B illustrates a front view of one side of an embodiment of system 100, illustrating another embodiment of cathode 132. As shown, cathode 132 is attached to detector 152. In this implementation, cathode 132 is formed as a screen 138. Screen 138 may serve to increase the surface area for particle emission. Screen 138 may be comprised of various metallic materials, such as Ni, Cu, Ag, and Au. As an example, a screen 138 commercially available from Delker, part number 3 Ni 5-077, is comprised of nickel, is 3 cm in size, has a thickness of 0.08 mm, and has eyelet dimensions of 1.5 mm.times.2.0 mm. FIG. 7C illustrates a front view of one side of an embodiment of system 100, illustrating another embodiment of cathode 132. As shown, cathode 132 is attached to detector 152. In this implementation, cathode 132 is formed as a foil 139. Foil 139 may serve to increase the surface area for particle emission. Foil 139 may be comprised of various metallic materials, such as Ni, Cu, Ag, and Au. As an example, a foil 139 commercially available from Aldrich, part number 349267, is 2.5 cm in size and has a thickness of 0.025 mm.
  • In the absence of an external electric/magnetic field, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis of electrodes prepared by Pd/D co-deposition exhibit highly expanded surfaces consisting of small spherical nodules to form a cauliflower-like morphology. Cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic pulsing experiments indicate that, by using the co-deposition technique, a high degree of deuterium loading (with an atomic ratio D/Pd>1) is obtained within seconds. These experiments also indicate the existence of a D.sub.2.sup.+ species within the Pd lattice. Because an ever expanding electrode surface is created, non-steady state conditions are assured, the cell geometry is simplified because there is no longer a need for a uniform current distribution on the cathode, and long charging times to achieve high deuterium loadings are eliminated.
  • Using the Pd/D co-deposition process, radiation emission and tritium production were documented. The results indicated that the reactions were nuclear in origin and that they occurred in the subsurface. To enhance these surface effects, experiments were conducted in the presence of either an external electric or magnetic field. SEM analysis showed that when a polarized Au/Pd/D electrode was exposed to an external electric field, significant morphological changes were observed. These changes ranged from re-orientation and/or separation of weakly connected globules, through forms exhibiting molten-like features. EDX analysis of these features showed the presence of additional elements (in an electric field Al, Mg, Ca, Si, and Zn; in a magnetic field Fe, Cr, Ni, and Zn) that could not be extracted from cell components and deposited on discrete sites.
  • To verify that the new elements observed on the cathodes were nuclear in origin, the Pd/D co-deposition was done in the presence of a CR-39 detector. CR-39 is a polyallydiglycol carbonate polymer that is widely used as a solid state nuclear track dosimeter chip. When traversing a plastic material such as CR-39, charged particles create along their ionization track a region that is more sensitive to chemical etching than the rest of the bulk. After treatment with an etching agent, tracks remain as holes or pits and their size and shape can be measured.
  • It should be noted that, in the area of modern dosimetry, CR-39 dosimeter chips are the most efficient detectors for the detection of light particles (alphas or protons). Experiments were conducted in which either a Ni screen or Au/Ag/Pt wire was wrapped around a CR-39 chip and was then used as the substrate for the Pd/D co-deposition. After the Pd was completely plated out, the cell was exposed to either an external electric or magnetic field. The experiment was terminated after two days and the CR-39 chip was etched using standard protocols (6.5 N NaOH at 70.degree. C. for 6-7 hrs). After etching, the chip was examined under a microscope.
  • The Pd/D co-deposition generated pits in CR-39 have the same properties as those created by nuclear particles as shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B. FIGS. 8A and 8B are microphotographs 300 and 400, respectively, of tracks in CR-39 due to an alpha source. When the microscope optics are focused on the surface of the detector, as shown in FIG. 8A, it can be seen that the tracks 310 are symmetrical in shape and dark in color. When the microscope optics are focused inside the pits 410, as shown in FIG. 8B, bright spots 420 are observed. Tracks have a conical shape. The bright spot 420 is caused by the bottom of the track acting like a lens when the detector is backlit. The dark, symmetrical shapes with bright spots at their centers are diagnostic of nuclear generated tracks.
  • FIGS. 8C and 8D show microphotographs 500 and 600, respectively, of Pd/D co-deposition generated tracks 510 and 610 obtained by focusing the microscope optics on the surface and the bottom of the pits, respectively. It can be seen that the Pd/D co-deposition generated tracks are dark and symmetrical in shape, with bright spots 520 and 620, respectively, inside them.
  • FIGS. 9A and 9B show images taken of the CR-39 detector after a Pd/D co-deposition experiment in a magnetic field. FIG. 9A illustrates a magnified image 700 of a CR-39 taken after a Pd/D co-deposition experiment in a magnetic field in accordance with an embodiment of the system and method for generating particles. FIG. 9B illustrates a further magnified image of image 700.
  • The electrode substrate used to create these images is a 0.25 mm diameter Ag wire. Visible inspection of the CR-39 chip showed a cloudy area where the electrode substrate was in close proximity to the CR-39 detector. The cloudy area 710 shown in FIG. 9A is approximately 0.5 mm wide and 4.6 mm long. The fact that the cloudy area was only observed where the detector was in close proximity to the cathode indicates that the cathode has caused the cloudiness. The 500.times. magnification of the center of the cloudy area shown in FIG. 9B illustrates the presence of numerous overlapping tracks 720, both large and small. The number of tracks is far more than are observed in laser fusion experiments (typically DD or DT).
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B show a side-by-side comparison of features observed when the detector is exposed to depleted U and a detector that has undergone exposure to a Pd/D co-deposition experiment in the presence of an external electric field. FIG. 10A illustrates a magnified image 800 of a CR-39 detector exposed to depleted uranium. FIG. 10B illustrates a magnified image 900 of a CR-39 detector exposed to a Pd/D co-deposition experiment performed on a Au wire in the presence of a 6000V external electric field in accordance with the disclosed subject matter. Since the features look the same, and since depleted Uranium is giving off alphas, it stands to reason that the features observed for the co-deposition experiment are also due to high energy particles. These particles can be either alphas, protons, or neutrons.
  • It should be noted that in the absence of an external electric/magnetic field, when Ni screen is used as the cathode, no tracks are observed on the CR-39 chip, as shown in FIG. 11. FIG. 11 illustrates an image 1000 of a CR-39 detector indicating X-ray emission, in accordance with an embodiment of the system and method for generating particles. Instead of tracks, the impression of the electrode substrate is observed in the CR-39 detector which has been caused by the emission of soft X-rays from the cathode.
  • The size of the tracks is proportional to the energy of the particle that created the track. It has been observed that the energy of the particles created in these experiments can be controlled by the electrode substrate. When the Pd/D co-deposition reaction is done on a light Z material such as Ni, the particles are small and homogeneous in size, as shown in image 1100 shown in FIG. 12A. However, when the reaction is done on a higher Z material, such as Ag, Au, or Pt, both large and small particles are observed, as shown in FIGS. 9A, 9B, 10B, 12A, and image 1200 shown in FIG. 12B.
  • FIG. 13A shows an SEM image 1300 of the Pd deposit on Au foil that has been exposed to a magnetic field. The Lorentz lines of the magnetic field have caused the Pd micro-globules to form star-like features. FIGS. 13B-13D show images 1400, 1500, and 1600, respectively, taken of a CR-39 detector after a Pd/D co-deposition experiment in a magnetic field using a Ag wire cathode. FIG. 13B shows that the tracks coincide with the Pd deposit indicating that the Pd deposit is the source of the tracks. FIGS. 13C and 13D show magnified images of the tracks. The tracks vary in size indicating that particles of different types and energies are being produced.

 

Inventors: Boss; Pamela A. (San Diego, CA), Gordon; Frank E. (San Diego, CA), Szpak; Stanislaw (Poway, CA), Forsley; Lawrence Parker Galloway (San Diego, CA)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Boss; Pamela A.
Gordon; Frank E.
Szpak; Stanislaw
Forsley; Lawrence Parker Galloway
San Diego
San Diego
Poway
San Diego
CA
CA
CA
CA
US
US
US
US
Assignee: JWK International Corporation (Annandale, VA)
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy (Washington, DC)
Family ID: 48049106
Appl. No.: 11/859,499
Filed: September 21, 2007

 

The Navy LENR – A Four Part Series

You are viewing Navy LENR Part I

Navy LENR Part II

Navy LENR Part III

Navy LENR Part IV 

Aether the Theory of Relativity and LENR Energy

“We may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities.      -In this sense-        -Therefore-  

There exists an ether.” – Albert Einstein

 

 

Way Back

In 1989, the popular yet controversial Cold Fusion ‘Fleischmann and Pons Effect’, challenged the notions of theoretical physicists of the time. Newly established arts today, like cold fusion-LENR-low energy nuclear reaction science, continue to do so.

Science progresses by challenging established notions that are not able to properly hold observed phenomenon within a theoretical framework. Through this process of – researching the unknown – new scientific arts become established. Then theoretical physicists have a whole new playground in which to make predictions; as well as an arena in which to create new physical theories and grandiose mathematical models of physics, such as the likes of Einstein’s.

Many modern arts of science weren’t firmly established when early cold fusion researchers started college. A few of these arts are notable in the LENR energy arena today. Nano Engineering and Science, with the likes of carbon nanotubes, allows for new methods of constructing the required fractal geometries within the low energy nuclear reactive lattice. Quantum Physics and Engineering also play an important role with a deeper understanding of the atom. This ever-growing field, understanding the actions in the subatomic realm, provides new glimpses into the inner workings of the low energy nuclear reactive environment. In this dynamic multidisciplinary field, LENR Sciences, both theory and engineering, are improving as we progress in the art.

During the early 80’s, one would venture to say, there were three or four dozen subatomic particles that we knew of. During Einstein’s time perhaps even less. Now we are looking at well over a hundred and fifty of them. The list is mind-boggling to conceptualize, observe, and then finally comprehend. (that’s what we have open minded experimental and theoretical scientists for) The article “Not so Elementary, My Dear Electron” is an example. It takes us far from the “Standard Model” of my youth. The once “elementary” electron has been ‘split’ into three… a holon, spinon, and orbiton.

After reading that article my pre-concieved grip on reality became so unhinged. That night I had a dream finding myself shrunk down, traveling the empty space within the low energy nuclear reactive environment. There, right before my eyes, an electron split into its’ three elements -WOW- One Went Flying OFF Into a Far Distancing Dimension

Then it Went Super Nova!!!               Lesson Learned

Watch what you read before nodding off into

The Aether of the Dreamland

My Heart Hopes That

We can ALL

Enjoy

 

Aether Science

Another art pertaining to the low energy nuclear environment is Aether Science – the science of the vacuum. The Aether, or ether, is that which fills “empty space”. “Space” is found in the outer reaches between planets and between stars and “Space” is found between atoms. There is more space than matter in the universe. More space between the atoms in molecules and more space between the subatomic particles of the atom than there is matter… yet space is not, in reality, truly empty. Read “Dark Energy Dark Matter” NASA

Quantum Science: Pushing the envelope and inviting us to explore the physical realities within the Aether. (links go to the U.S. DoE search engine) Research these sciences at the U.S Department of Energy – Office of Science website links: into Dark Energy (see 46 papers – year 2013), into Zero Point Energy (see 13 papers – year 2013) , into Vacuum Field (see 43 papers –  under ‘Energy’), into Gravity (see 103 papers – year 2013), into LENR (see 38 papers – under ‘Low Energy Nuclear Reaction’)

During an Address delivered on May 5th, 1920, at the University of Leyden

A theoretical physicist once said,

“As to the part which the new ether is to play in the physics of the future we are not yet clear. We know that it determines the metrical relations in the space-time continuum, e.g. the configurative possibilities of solid bodies as well as the gravitational fields; but we do not know whether it has an essential share in the structure of the electrical elementary particles constituting matter. Nor do we know whether it is only in the proximity of ponderable masses that its structure differs essentially from that of the Lorentzian ether; whether the geometry of spaces of cosmic extent is approximately Euclidean. But we can assert by reason of the relativistic equations of gravitation that there must be a departure from Euclidean relations, with spaces of cosmic order of magnitude, if there exists a positive mean density, no matter how small, of the matter in the universe. In this case the universe must of necessity be spatially unbounded and of finite magnitude, its magnitude being determined by the value of that mean density.

If we consider the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field from the standpoint of the ether hypothesis, we find a remarkable difference between the two. There can be no space nor any part of space without gravitational potentials; for these confer upon space its metrical qualities, without which it cannot be imagined at all. The existence of the gravitational field is inseparably bound up with the existence of space. On the other hand a part of space may very well be imagined without an electromagnetic field; thus in contrast with the gravitational field, the electromagnetic field seems to be only secondarily linked to the ether, the formal nature of the electromagnetic field being as yet in no way determined by that of gravitational ether. From the present state of theory it looks as if the electromagnetic field, as opposed to the gravitational field, rests upon an entirely new formal motif, as though nature might just as well have endowed the gravitational ether with fields of quite another type, for example, with fields of a scalar potential, instead of fields of the electromagnetic type.

Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field, our present view of the universe presents two realities which are completely separated from each other conceptually, although connected causally, namely, gravitational ether and electromagnetic field, or — as they might also be called — space and matter.

Of course it would be a great advance if we could succeed in comprehending the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field together as one unified conformation. Then for the first time the epoch of theoretical physics founded by Faraday and Maxwell would reach a satisfactory conclusion. The contrast between ether and matter would fade away, and, through the general theory of relativity, the whole of physics would become a complete system of thought, like geometry, kinematics, and the theory of gravitation.”

Albert Einstein

What is Aether?

Robert B. Laughlin Nobel Laureate in Physics-Stanford University-The Ether

In contemporary theoretical physics: “It is ironic that Einstein’s most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed. The word ‘ether’ has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with ‘stuff’ that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo.” Laughlin, Robert B. (2005). “A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down”  pp. 120–121.

from the Bottom Down” A REVIEW By Jeremy Chunn

“Tired of the predictable ‘clockwork’ nature of the physical world as defined by Newtonian laws? Then you’ll find a friend in Robert B. Laughlin. He suspects the fact that Newtonian laws break down at quantum levels and fail to predict all phases between states is evidence the physical world is still highly mysterious.”

Paul Dirac wrote in 1951

“Physical knowledge has advanced much since 1905, notably by the arrival of quantum mechanics, and the situation [about the scientific plausibility of Aether] has again changed. If one examines the question in the light of present-day knowledge, one finds that the Aether is no longer ruled out by relativity, and good reasons can now be advanced for postulating an Aether. We have now the velocity at all points of space-time, playing a fundamental part in electrodynamics. It is natural to regard it as the velocity of some real physical thing. Thus with the new theory of electrodynamics [vacuum filled with virtual particles] we are rather forced to have an Aether”. “Is there an Aether?”, Nature 168 (1951), p. 906.

… Is there an Aether?” abstract by Dirac St. John’s College, Cambridge. Oct. 9, 1951

IN the last century, the idea of a universal and all-pervading æther was popular as a foundation on which to build the theory of electromagnetic phenomena. The situation was profoundly influenced in 1905 by Einstein’s discovery of the principle of relativity, leading to the requirement of a four-dimensional formulation of all natural laws. It was soon found that the existence of an æther could not be fitted in with relativity, and since relativity was well established, the æther was abandoned.

John Bell, interviewed by Paul Davies in “The Ghost in the Atom” 1986

Has suggested that an Aether theory might help resolve the EPR paradox by allowing a reference frame in which signals go faster than light. He suggests Lorentz contraction is perfectly coherent, not inconsistent with relativity, and could produce an aether theory perfectly consistent with the Michelson-Morley experiment.

Bell suggests the aether was wrongly rejected on purely philosophical grounds:

“What is unobservable does not exist”

Besides the arguments based on his interpretation of quantum mechanics; Bell also suggests resurrecting the aether because it is a useful pedagogical device. That is, many problems are solved more easily by imagining the existence of an aether.   The Ghost in the Atom: A Discussion of the Mysteries of Quantum Physics

As noted by Alexander Markovich Polyakov in 1987

Elementary particles existing in nature resemble very much excitations of some complicated medium (Aether). We do not know the detailed structure of the Aether but we have learned a lot about effective Lagrangians for its low energy excitations. It is as if we knew nothing about the molecular structure of some liquid but did know the Navier-Stokes equation and could thus predict many exciting things.

Clearly, there are lots of different possibilities at the molecular level:

Leading to the same low energy picture. – end quote

From Harwood Academic Publishers (1987), A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge Fields and Strings” sec,12

LENR and the Aether – Harold Aspden

‘Heavy Electron’ -‘Mu-meson’ Vacuum Field – Electron Proton ‘Creation’

Dr. Harold Aspden is of particular interest. A brilliant man, he successfully predicted the mass of the proton and was a pioneer of efficient thermal electric conversion devices. He was the first to be issued a U.S. patent with ‘cold fusion’ contained in the text of the application. A further example of his brilliance is his theoretical papers on Aether Science. This list is of ten Harold Aspden patents granted, applied, or cited  that concern “Cold Fusion” LENR and the Aether (ZPE). Here is an excellent biography of the honorable Dr. Harold Aspden including all theories, works published, and documented efforts in the Aether and LENR sciences.

GIVE THANKS and Support to Pure Energy Systems News for compiling the best in LENR history and news.

Ten of the 119 patents found at Cold Fusion NowHarold Aspden Patent Tribute – Honoring Dr. Aspden

For links to these patents open the “Harold Aspden Patent Tribute” 

  1. Cold Nuclear Fusion Method and Apparatus App. – Filed Apr 20, 1990 – Published Nov 1, 1990 – Richard Geoffrey Belton – The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited May 23, 1994, Dec 8, 1994, Aspden, Harold, Hydrogen activated heat generation apparatus
  2. Hydrogen Activated Heat Generation Apparatus App. – Filed May 23, 1994 – Published Dec 8, 1994 – Aspden, Harold, Eneco, Inc. Inventors. Harold Aspden. Applicant. Aspden, Harold
  3. Cold Nuclear Fusion Method and Apparatus App. – Filed Apr 20, 1990 – Published Nov 1, 1990 – Richard Geoffrey Belton – The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited May 23, 1994, Dec 8, 1994, Aspden, Harold, Hydrogen activated heat generation apparatus
  4. Methods and Systems for Generating High Energy Photons or Quantum… Grant – Filed Nov 21, 2001 – Issued Aug 30, 2005 – Kiril B. Chukanov – Chukanov Quantum Energy, L.L.C.
… OTHER PUBLICATIONS Aspden, Harold, “Aether Science Papers: Part I: The Creative Vacuum,” Aether Science Papers, (1996), pp. 26-32. Chukanov, KM
  5. Device to Move an Object Back and Forth Grant – Filed Jan 22, 2008 – Issued Mar 8, 2011 – Harvey Emanuel Fiala, 
Harold E. Puthoff, and Harold Aspden are recent exponents of  ZPE. …. Aspden, Harold: Power from Space: Inertia and Gravitation, Energy Science Report No.
  6. Inertial Propulsion Device to Move an Object Up and Down Grant – Filed Feb 11, 2011 – Issued Nov 29, 2011 – Harvey E. Fiala
… energy (ZPE) or space energy at every point in space, possibly even of the order or magnitude of nuclear energy
  7. Hydrogen Activated Heat Generation Apparatus App. – Filed May 23, 1994 – Published Feb 9, 1995 – Inventors. Harold Aspden. Applicant. Aspden, Harold
  8. Production of Thermal Energy App. – Filed Jun 4, 1990 – Published Dec 13, 1990 – Cyril Barrie Edwards – Edwards, Barrie, Cyril
… May 23, 1994, Dec 8, 1994, Aspden, Harold, Hydrogen activated heat generation apparatus
  9. Method for Producing Plasma Nuclear Fusion App. – Filed Apr 9, 1990 – Published Oct 24, 1990 – Shunpei Yamazaki -Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. May 23, 1994, Dec 8, 1994, Aspden, Harold, Hydrogen activated heat generation apparatus
  10. Solid State Surface Micro-Plasma Fusion Device App. – Filed May 28, 1992 – Published Dec 23, 1992 – Ell Yeong Kim – Purdue Research Foundation May 23, 1994, Dec 8, 1994, Aspden, Harold, Hydrogen activated heat generation apparatus

Told by Dr. Aspden

His story of a ‘Cold Fusion’ institutional firewall at the U.S. patent office

The tactics I adopted in my efforts to secure a granted patent involved filing a U.S. continuation-in-part application based on the pending cold fusion application that had survived the PCT stage, but before it came under the executioner’s axe wielded by Harvey Behrend. My plan was to emphasize the thermoelectric aspects of the invention, but discuss their relevance to ‘cold fusion’ and incorporate a very substantial Appendix on that subject. I wrote the specification discussing the merits of ‘cold fusion’ and offered as an invention a special form of apparatus which I regarded as useful for testing the cold fusion process.

There was a 50:50 chance that the new application would be assigned to Harvey Behrend’s examining group, but the abstract stressed thermoelectric energy conversion and not cold fusion, so I had my fingers crossed in hoping that Art group 1102 and not Harvey Behrend’s Art group 2204 would be put in charge of the case in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

So that you, the reader, may understand what this is all about, and particularly so that my colleagues in the patent profession in Europe who may come to hear about this as well may understand, I feel it appropriate to quote a few words from an article which appeared in the July-November double issue of ‘Infinite Energy’, Nos. 15 and 16, at page. 86.

I refer to Dr. Hal Fox’s article ‘New Energy Sources for the Near Future: An Open Letter to Decision Makers’. Hal Fox is Editor of the Journal of New Energy. He is located in Utah, where the saga of cold fusion was born, and he has followed the cold fusion theme as closely as anyone over the years dating from March 1989, when that hope and prospect for a new energy technology was first announced.

Hal Fox, Quote…

“A university professor who has been supported by a multi-million dollar hot fusion contract and who becomes an advisor to the Department of Energy is unlikely to advise the government to fund a competitive low-energy technology. There would be very strong university pressure to continue in the development of hot fusion! This combination of federal funds, appointments to advisory groups, and the pressures for institutional funds on the advisers, has resulted in scientists becoming lobbyists with the following results:

  • The Office of Patents and Trademarks has been advised not to allow patents on competitive technology to hot fusion.

  • Leaders of some professional societies (such as the American Physical Society) have lobbied to prevent major peer-reviewed journals from publishing articles about competing technologies.

Aether: How it relates to cold fusion (link)

A BREAKTHROUGH: U.S. PATENT NO. 5,734,122

Cold Fusion Appears in a U.S. Patent!

Copyright © 1998 Harold Aspden

The Fusion Criteria

In a very hot proton gas protons can combine to create heavier atomic nuclei. This is facilitated if there is something effectively neutralizing the charge repulsion between the protons. A proton or anti-proton charge can become neutral if a beta particle of opposite polarity combines with it in some way to be seen as a neutron. Alternatively it is conceivable that in the very energetic field conditions that one can foresee, particularly in the presence of strong gravity fields, the field medium itself can be such as to overcome the mutual repulsion or the medium itself may become electrically polarized to provide a background that can serve as the neutralizing influence. In any event, the high energy physics of the scenario by which protons synthesize heavier forms of matter has to explain why hot fusion occurs and the picture just presented has to be very close to what has just been outlined.

Now, there is one important aspect here that tends to be overlooked. How do those protons get created in the first place? The scientific challenge here is not concerned with fusion but rather initial creation and the answer lies in finding the true explanation for what governs the mass of the proton. This is a theoretical exercise in which this Applicant has played an important and recognized part, because, although the world has not rushed into accepting the Applicant’s explanation, it is a fact that the precise value of the proton-electron mass ratio of 1836.152 was deduced in terms of the mu-meson field. This derivation involved collaboration with Dr. D. M. Eagles of the then National Standards Laboratory in Australia. It was reported in the U.S.A. Institute of Physics journal Physics Today in 1984 (November issue, p. 15) and was mentioned in their 1985 update by the leading U.S. researchers who measure this quantity. See R.S. Van Dyck et al: International Journal of Mass Spectroscopy and Ion Processes, 66, (1985) pp. 327-337. They noted how remarkably close the theoretical value was to the one they measured and added ‘This is even more curious when one notes that they [meaning this Applicant and Dr. Eagles] published this result several years before direct precision measurements of this ratio had begun.

‘Given that the Applicant knows how protons are created from a mu-meson field and taking into account that physicists familiar with quantum electrodynamics know that the vacuum field is the seat of activity of electron and positron creation and that mu-mesons are otherwise known as ‘heavy electrons’, it needs little imagination then to suspect that Nature is trying to create protons continuously everywhere in space. Since we do not see such protons materializing before our eyes we must infer that they exist only very transiently after creation unless the field medium has surplus energy to be shed over and above its local equilibrium requirements.

The Applicant’s Electrodynamic Research

There are long-accepted but unresolved anomalies concerning the anomalously very high forces exerted on heavy ions in a cold cathode discharge. In researching this subject the Applicant has established that the forces exerted on a heavy ion owing to its electrodynamic interaction with an electron are, in theory, enhanced by a factor equal to the ion-electron mass ratio.

This theory leads to a breach of the law that specifies balance of action and reaction, which means that energy is being exchanged with the field medium in which the electromagnetic reference frame is seated. The effective electromagnetic reference frame has a structure, as if it is formed by a fluid crystal lattice which, on a local scale, can adapt or maybe govern the shell structure of an atomic nucleus. Thus, normally, the motion of atoms and even ions in a gas or a solution will not evidence the anomalous electrodynamic effects, simply because they do not move relative to the local electromagnetic reference frame, meaning that, as far as concerns translational motion, the electrons present are the only active participant electrodynamically.

It is, however, quite a different situation when we consider a proton or a deuteron as a free ion inside the crystal host lattice of a metallic form, because there can only be one electromagnetic reference frame effective at any location in that metal. Therefore, a proton that is within a host crystal, and is free to move through it, will be seen as moving relative to the electromagnetic reference frame and then it can contribute to anomalous electrodynamic effects.

These conditions were the subject of the Applicant’s research as a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the University of Southampton in England 1983 onwards. The Applicant had written on the subject of the proton, the deuteron and the neutron, pursuing the theme that no neutrons exist inside the deuteron and stressing that atomic nuclei are composites of beta particles and protons or antiprotons. This work was all published before 1989.

The anomalous electrodynamic forces that exist in the heavy ion/electron interaction imply a hidden source of energy and so of heat but the Applicant’s research was aimed essentially at proving the modified law of electrodynamics dictated by that research. Certainly, whilst the ability to accelerate heavy ions by drawing on a hidden source of field energy was one of the Applicant’s pursuits, at no time had the Applicant contemplated the prospect of a fusion reaction of the kind implied by Fleischmann and Pons.

Nevertheless, as soon as that latter work was reported, the research knowledge arising from the author’s investigations was seen as relevant in the onward exploration of the excess heat phenomenon.

The Applicant was not only interested because of the excess energy aspect. There was the no-neutron feature and the fact that the process involved ion migration through water. There was the fact that the deuteron was the primary agent and this Applicant had shown, from the theory of the deuteron mass and its magnetic moment, that deuterons undergo cyclic changes of state and the state which prevails for one seventh of the time, the deuteron has a neutral core, having transiently shed a beta particle. More than this, however, the author had become involved at the time with two inventions, one of which later became the subject of a U.S. Patent (Serial No. 5,065,085) and these involved anomalous energy activity in a thermoelectric context which bears upon the cold fusion issue.

The other, lesser important, of these inventions was concerned with ‘warm’ superconductivity. The Applicant’s research had suggested that substances having certain molecular mass forms are adapted to absorb impact by conduction electrons in such a way that the change of inductive energy accompanying the collision is conserved until the resulting EMF changes can impart the energy to another electron. This meant that the thermal energy of a heavy ion in the substance could be reduced to feed the normal resistance loss associated with the current. This was, therefore, a process by which anomalous heat energy activity was involved in electrodynamic interactions between heavy ions and electrons.

The more important invention of the two just mentioned was concerned with the anomalous behaviour of a thermoelectric interface between two metals when subjected to a strong magnetic field in a rather special conductor configuration. The Nernst Effect operates to cause heat carried by electrons in a metal to be converted into an electric potential energy by the ordering action of a transversely directed magnetic field.

The essential requirement for the action of the Nernst Effect is that there is a temperature gradient in the metal and, given such a temperature gradient, and the magnetic field, there will then be an electric potential gradient set up within the metal. Now, a potential gradient inside a metal conductor implies that there is inside the body of the metal a distribution of electric charge not neutralized by normal metallic conduction. The polarity of that charge is determined by the direction of the thermal gradient and the orientation of the magnetic field. It can be negative or positive by choice in the design of the apparatus used.

Besides this, the Applicant knew that the flow of a strong current through a metal conductor will promote what is known as the pinch effect in which electrodynamic forces act on the negative electron charge carriers to pinch them inwards and so set up an excess negative charge distribution inside the metal conductor.

This, plus the additional feature that a strong current flow through a metal conductor that is populated by free deuterons will promote a migration of deuterons that will bring them more frequently into near collision, all militated in favour of an invention proposing the provision of a supplementary high current closed circuit through the cathode of a cold fusion cell. That, indeed, became the subject of the patent application which the Applicant filed in U.K. on April 15, 1989, this being the priority application relied upon in the U.S. Patent Application under petition.

The Applicant, therefore, had reason to believe that the work on cold fusion would progress if the auxiliary current activation circuit were to be used.

However, in the event, the pioneer work of Fleischmann and Pons became the subject of such criticism that there was no prospect of getting R & D funding to take the subject invention forward and one is confronted with a chicken and egg scenario where disbelief of cold fusion as a scientific possibility stands in the way of securing patent grant and the doubts about securing a patent stands in the way of finding sponsorship for the development.

The Fusion Criteria Reexamined: There are three criteria that need to be satisfied simultaneously to promote and enhance the cold fusion reaction of deuterons. 

  • Firstly, there is the background incidence of the virtual mu-meson field which is trying everywhere to create protons. This is a natural activity that cannot be controlled. It is a statistical effect, but one can calculate the probability governing proton creation fluctuations in a given volume of cathode material. See comments below. 

  • Secondly, there is the need to bring the deuteron partner in the fusion process into close proximity with the target deuteron. In hot fusion reactions this is achieved by the motion associated with thermal activity. In cold fusion it is achieved by adsorbing deuterons into a host metal in which they become separate from their satellite electrons and by concentrating the loading by the deuteron population. 

  • Thirdly, as with the creation of stars and by hydrogen fusion, there is the need to provide the field which pulls the deuterons together in spite of their mutual repulsion. In cold fusion this means the provision of a neutralizing negative charge distribution within the metal body of host metal. This requires strong electron current surges resulting in heat concentrations which set up temperature gradients in company with transverse magnetic fields. However, the structural form of the host metal in relation to the current channel, the magnetic field effect and the heat conduction path require a mutually orthogonal geometry to provide an optimum action. 

Note that the surplus negative charge may result in a charge density that is quite small in relation to the positive charge of the deuteron population but every unit of charge is seated in a discrete electron and a single electron which can upset the normal charge balance of deuterons and free conduction electrons can nucleate a pair of deuterons.

Then, the creation of a proton in one deuteron accompanied by the demise of a proton in the other will convert the two deuterons into a tritium nucleus and free a proton with a beta particle transferring between the two. Alternatively one deuteron will convert into helium 3 and the proton released will be in company with a beta minus particle.

The onward reactions involving neutrons that are observed with hot fusion processes need not occur if the events involved are triggered naturally by the mu-meson activity in trying to create protons rather than by neutron bombardment.

 

Excellent Perspective From Relativity Past

 

“Ether and the Theory of Relativity” By Albert Einstein

An Address delivered on May 5th, 1920, 
in the University of Leyden

Translated by George Barker Jeffery and Wilfrid Perrett

From: Sidelights on Relativity (1922), pp.3-24, London: Methuen

German original: Äther und Relativitätstheorie (1920), Berlin: Springer

How does it come about that alongside of the idea of ponderable matter, which is derived by abstraction from everyday life, the physicists set the idea of the existence of another kind of matter, the ether? The explanation is probably to be sought in those phenomena which have given rise to the theory of action at a distance, and in the properties of light which have led to the undulatory theory. Let us devote a little while to the consideration of these two subjects.

Outside of physics we know nothing of action at a distance. When we try to connect cause and effect in the experiences which natural objects afford us, it seems at first as if there were no other mutual actions than those of immediate contact, e.g. the communication of motion by impact, push and pull, heating or inducing combustion by means of a flame, etc. It is true that even in everyday experience weight, which is in a sense action at a distance, plays a very important part. But since in daily experience the weight of bodies meets us as something constant, something not linked to any cause which is variable in time or place, we do not in everyday life speculate as to the cause of gravity, and therefore do not become conscious of its character as action at a distance. It was Newton’s theory of gravitation that first assigned a cause for gravity by interpreting it as action at a distance, proceeding from masses. Newton’s theory is probably the greatest stride ever made in the effort towards the causal nexus of natural phenomena. And yet this theory evoked a lively sense of discomfort among Newton’s contemporaries, because it seemed to be in conflict with the principle springing from the rest of experience, that there can be reciprocal action only through contact, and not through immediate action at a distance.

It is only with reluctance that man’s desire for knowledge endures a dualism of this kind. How was unity to be preserved in his comprehension of the forces of nature? Either by trying to look upon contact forces as being themselves distant forces which admittedly are observable only at a very small distance and this was the road which Newton’s followers, who were entirely under the spell of his doctrine, mostly preferred to take; or by assuming that the Newtonian action at a distance is only apparently immediate action at a distance, but in truth is conveyed by a medium permeating space, whether by movements or by elastic deformation of this medium. Thus the endeavour toward a unified view of the nature of forces leads to the hypothesis of an ether. This hypothesis, to be sure, did not at first bring with it any advance in the theory of gravitation or in physics generally, so that it became customary to treat Newton’s law of force as an axiom not further reducible. But the ether hypothesis was bound always to play some part in physical science, even if at first only a latent part.

When in the first half of the nineteenth century the far-reaching similarity was revealed which subsists between the properties of light and those of elastic waves in ponderable bodies, the ether hypothesis found fresh support. It appeared beyond question that light must be interpreted as a vibratory process in an elastic, inert medium filling up universal space. It also seemed to be a necessary consequence of the fact that light is capable of polarisation that this medium, the ether, must be of the nature of a solid body, because transverse waves are not possible in a fluid, but only in a solid. Thus the physicists were bound to arrive at the theory of the “quasi-rigid ” luminiferous ether, the parts of which can carry out no movements relatively to one another except the small movements of deformation which correspond to light-waves.

This theory — also called the theory of the stationary luminiferous ether — moreover found a strong support in an experiment which is also of fundamental importance in the special theory of relativity, the experiment of Fizeau, from which one was obliged to infer that the luminiferous ether does not take part in the movements of bodies. The phenomenon of aberration also favoured the theory of the quasi-rigid ether.

The development of the theory of electricity along the path opened up by Maxwell and Lorentz gave the development of our ideas concerning the ether quite a peculiar and unexpected turn. For Maxwell himself the ether indeed still had properties which were purely mechanical, although of a much more complicated kind than the mechanical properties of tangible solid bodies. But neither Maxwell nor his followers succeeded in elaborating a mechanical model for the ether which might furnish a satisfactory mechanical interpretation of Maxwell’s laws of the electro-magnetic field. The laws were clear and simple, the mechanical interpretations clumsy and contradictory. Almost imperceptibly the theoretical physicists adapted themselves to a situation which, from the standpoint of their mechanical programme, was very depressing. They were particularly influenced by the electro-dynamical investigations of Heinrich Hertz. For whereas they previously had required of a conclusive theory that it should content itself with the fundamental concepts which belong exclusively to mechanics (e.g. densities, velocities, deformations, stresses) they gradually accustomed themselves to admitting electric and magnetic force as fundamental concepts side by side with those of mechanics, without requiring a mechanical interpretation for them. Thus the purely mechanical view of nature was gradually abandoned. But this change led to a fundamental dualism which in the long-run was insupportable. A way of escape was now sought in the reverse direction, by reducing the principles of mechanics to those of electricity, and this especially as confidence in the strict validity of the equations of Newton’s mechanics was shaken by the experiments with β-rays and rapid kathode rays.

This dualism still confronts us in unextenuated form in the theory of Hertz, where matter appears not only as the bearer of velocities, kinetic energy, and mechanical pressures, but also as the bearer of electromagnetic fields. Since such fields also occur in vacuo — i.e. in free ether the ether — also appears as bearer of electromagnetic fields. The ether appears indistinguishable in its functions from ordinary matter. Within matter it takes part in the motion of matter and in empty space it has everywhere a velocity; so that the ether has a definitely assigned velocity throughout the whole of space. There is no fundamental difference between Hertz’s ether and ponderable matter (which in part subsists in the ether).

The Hertz theory suffered not only from the defect of ascribing to matter and ether, on the one hand mechanical states, and on the other hand electrical states, which do not stand in any conceivable relation to each other; it was also at variance with the result of Fizeau’s important experiment on the velocity of the propagation of light in moving fluids, and with other established experimental results.

Such was the state of things when H. A. Lorentz entered upon the scene. He brought theory into harmony with experience by means of a wonderful simplification of theoretical principles. He achieved this, the most important advance in the theory of electricity since Maxwell, by taking from ether its mechanical, and from matter its electromagnetic qualities. As in empty space, so too in the interior of material bodies, the ether, and not matter viewed atomistically, was exclusively the seat of electromagnetic fields. According to Lorentz the elementary particles of matter alone are capable of carrying out movements; their electromagnetic activity is entirely confined to the carrying of electric charges. Thus Lorentz succeeded in reducing all electromagnetic happenings to Maxwell’s equations for free space.

As to the mechanical nature of the Lorentzian ether, it may be said of it, in a somewhat playful spirit, that immobility is the only mechanical property of which it has not been deprived by H. A. Lorentz. It may be added that the whole change in the conception of the ether which the special theory of relativity brought about, consisted in taking away from the ether its last mechanical quality, namely, its immobility. How this is to be understood will forthwith be expounded.

The space-time theory and the kinematics of the special theory of relativity were modelled on the Maxwell-Lorentz theory of the electromagnetic field. This theory therefore satisfies the conditions of the special theory of relativity, but when viewed from the latter it acquires a novel aspect. For if K be a system of co-ordinates relatively to which the Lorentzian ether is at rest, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations are valid primarily with reference to K. But by the special theory of relativity the same equations without any change of meaning also hold in relation to any new system of co-ordinates K’ which is moving in uniform translation relatively to K. Now comes the anxious question: — Why must I in the theory distinguish the K system above all K’ systems, which are physically equivalent to it in all respects, by assuming that the ether is at rest relatively to the K system? For the theoretician such an asymmetry in the theoretical structure, with no corresponding asymmetry in the system of experience, is intolerable. If we assume the ether to be at rest relatively to K, but in motion relatively to K’, the physical equivalence of K and K’ seems to me from the logical standpoint, not indeed downright incorrect, but nevertheless unacceptable.

The next position which it was possible to take up in face of this state of things appeared to be the following. The ether does not exist at all. The electromagnetic fields are not states of a medium, and are not bound down to any bearer, but they are independent realities which are not reducible to anything else, exactly like the atoms of ponderable matter. This conception suggests itself the more readily as, according to Lorentz’s theory, electromagnetic radiation, like ponderable matter, brings impulse and energy with it, and as, according to the special theory of relativity, both matter and radiation are but special forms of distributed energy, ponderable mass losing its isolation and appearing as a special form of energy.

More careful reflection teaches us, however, that the special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny ether. We may assume the existence of an ether; only we must give up ascribing a definite state of motion to it, i.e. we must by abstraction take from it the last mechanical characteristic which Lorentz had still left it. We shall see later that this point of view, the conceivability of which I shall at once endeavour to make more intelligible by a somewhat halting comparison, is justified by the results of the general theory of relativity.

Think of waves on the surface of water. Here we can describe two entirely different things. Either we may observe how the undulatory surface forming the boundary between water and air alters in the course of time; or else — with the help of small floats, for instance — we can observe how the position of the separate particles of water alters in the course of time. If the existence of such floats for tracking the motion of the particles of a fluid were a fundamental impossibility in physics — if, in fact, nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterize it as a medium.

We have something like this in the electromagnetic field. For we may picture the field to ourselves as consisting of lines of force. If we wish to interpret these lines of force to ourselves as something material in the ordinary sense, we are tempted to interpret the dynamic processes as motions of these lines of force, such that each separate line of force is tracked through the course of time. It is well known, however, that this way of regarding the electromagnetic field leads to contradictions.

Generalizing we must say this: — There may be supposed to be extended physical objects to which the idea of motion cannot be applied. They may not be thought of as consisting of particles which allow themselves to be separately tracked through time. In Minkowski’s idiom this is expressed as follows: — Not every extended conformation in the four-dimensional world can be regarded as composed of world-threads. The special theory of relativity forbids us to assume the ether to consist of particles observable through time, but the hypothesis of ether in itself is not in conflict with the special theory of relativity. Only we must be on our guard against ascribing a state of motion to the ether.

Certainly, from the standpoint of the special theory of relativity, the ether hypothesis appears at first to be an empty hypothesis. In the equations of the electromagnetic field there occur, in addition to the densities of the electric charge, only the intensities of the field. The career of electromagnetic processes in vacua appears to be completely determined by these equations, uninfluenced by other physical quantities. The electromagnetic fields appear as ultimate, irreducible realities, and at first it seems superfluous to postulate a homogeneous, isotropic ether-medium, and to envisage electromagnetic fields as states of this medium.

But on the other hand there is a weighty argument to be adduced in favour of the ether hypothesis. To deny the ether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever. The fundamental facts of mechanics do not harmonize with this view. For the mechanical behaviour of a corporeal system hovering freely in empty space depends not only on relative positions (distances) and relative velocities, but also on its state of rotation, which physically may be taken as a characteristic not appertaining to the system in itself. In order to be able to look upon the rotation of the system, at least formally, as something real, Newton objectivises space. Since he classes his absolute space together with real things, for him rotation relative to an absolute space is also something real. Newton might no less well have called his absolute space “Ether”; what is essential is merely that besides observable objects, another thing, which is not perceptible, must be looked upon as real, to enable acceleration or rotation to be looked upon as something real.

It is true that Mach tried to avoid having to accept as real something which is not observable by endeavouring to substitute in mechanics a mean acceleration with reference to the totality of the masses in the universe in place of an acceleration with reference to absolute space. But inertial resistance opposed to relative acceleration of distant masses presupposes action at a distance; and as the modern physicist does not believe that he may accept this action at a distance, he comes back once more, if he follows Mach, to the ether, which has to serve as medium for the effects of inertia. But this conception of the ether to which we are led by Mach’s way of thinking differs essentially from the ether as conceived by Newton, by Fresnel, and by Lorentz. Mach’s ether not only conditions the behaviour of inert masses, but is also conditioned in its state by them.

Mach’s idea finds its full development in the ether of the general theory of relativity. According to this theory the metrical qualities of the continuum of space-time differ in the environment of different points of space-time, and are partly conditioned by the matter existing outside of the territory under consideration. This space-time variability of the reciprocal relations of the standards of space and time, or, perhaps, the recognition of the fact that “empty space” in its physical relation is neither homogeneous nor isotropic, compelling us to describe its state by ten functions (the gravitation potentials gμν), has, I think, finally disposed of the view that space is physically empty. But therewith the conception of the ether has again acquired an intelligible content, although this content differs widely from that of the ether of the mechanical undulatory theory of light. The ether of the general theory of relativity is a medium which is itself devoid of all mechanical and kinematical qualities, but helps to determine mechanical (and electromagnetic) events.

What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that the state of the former is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations; whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute constants for the functions of space which describe the former, disregarding the causes which condition its state. Thus we may also say, I think, that the ether of the general theory of relativity is the outcome of the Lorentzian ether, through relativation.

As to the part which the new ether is to play in the physics of the future we are not yet clear. We know that it determines the metrical relations in the space-time continuum, e.g. the configurative possibilities of solid bodies as well as the gravitational fields; but we do not know whether it has an essential share in the structure of the electrical elementary particles constituting matter. Nor do we know whether it is only in the proximity of ponderable masses that its structure differs essentially from that of the Lorentzian ether; whether the geometry of spaces of cosmic extent is approximately Euclidean. But we can assert by reason of the relativistic equations of gravitation that there must be a departure from Euclidean relations, with spaces of cosmic order of magnitude, if there exists a positive mean density, no matter how small, of the matter in the universe. In this case the universe must of necessity be spatially unbounded and of finite magnitude, its magnitude being determined by the value of that mean density.

If we consider the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field from the standpoint of the ether hypothesis, we find a remarkable difference between the two. There can be no space nor any part of space without gravitational potentials; for these confer upon space its metrical qualities, without which it cannot be imagined at all. The existence of the gravitational field is inseparably bound up with the existence of space. On the other hand a part of space may very well be imagined without an electromagnetic field; thus in contrast with the gravitational field, the electromagnetic field seems to be only secondarily linked to the ether, the formal nature of the electromagnetic field being as yet in no way determined by that of gravitational ether. From the present state of theory it looks as if the electromagnetic field, as opposed to the gravitational field, rests upon an entirely new formal motif, as though nature might just as well have endowed the gravitational ether with fields of quite another type, for example, with fields of a scalar potential, instead of fields of the electromagnetic type.

Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field, our present view of the universe presents two realities which are completely separated from each other conceptually, although connected causally, namely, gravitational ether and electromagnetic field, or — as they might also be called — space and matter.

Of course it would be a great advance if we could succeed in comprehending the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field together as one unified conformation. Then for the first time the epoch of theoretical physics founded by Faraday and Maxwell would reach a satisfactory conclusion. The contrast between ether and matter would fade away, and, through the general theory of relativity, the whole of physics would become a complete system of thought, like geometry, kinematics, and the theory of gravitation. An exceedingly ingenious attempt in this direction has been made by the mathematician H. Weyl; but I do not believe that his theory will hold its ground in relation to reality. Further, in contemplating the immediate future of theoretical physics we ought not unconditionally to reject the possibility that the facts comprised in the quantum theory may set bounds to the field theory beyond which it cannot pass.

Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.”

Scientific Theoretical Physicists

Physics author A. Zee is a Permanent Member of the Institute for Theoretical Physics and Professor of Theoretical Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Professor A. Zee was invited to write an introduction to the new edition of Feynman’s classic book on quantum electrodynamics. Feynman’s QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter

A quote from the introduction:

“Theoretical physicists are a notoriously pragmatic lot. They will use whichever method is the easiest. There is none of the mathematicians’ petulant insistence on rigor and proof. Whatever works, man!

Given this attitude, you may ask, which of the three formalisms, Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and Dirac-Feynman, is the easiest? The answer depends on the problem. In treating atoms for example, as the master himself admits on page 100, the Feynman diagrams “for these atoms would involve so many straight and wiggly lines and they’d be a complete mess!”

The Schrödinger formalism is much easier by a long shot and that is what physicists use. In fact, for most “practical” problems the path integral formalism is almost hopelessly involved, and in some cases downright impossible. I once even asked Feynman about one of these apparently impossible cases and he had no answer. Yet beginning students using the Schrödinger formalism easily solve these apparently impossible cases!

Thus, which formalism is best really depends on the physics problem, so that theoretical physicists in one field, atomic physics for example, might favor one formalism, while those in another, high energy physics for example, might prefer another formalism.

Logically then, it may even happen that, as a given field evolves and develops, one formalism may emerge as more convenient than another.” – end quote

 

The Responsibly Imaginable

To Possibly Be

Imaginable    So Responsibly

Creatively See

Observational    The Reality

Hope of Theory

Occupational   A Visionary

Energize Plea

Survival         With Planetary

Space Faring

Quantum    LENR

Energy

 

gbgoble2013

FARING : intransitive verb

1. To get along

2. To go or happen

3. To travel; go.

4. To dine; eat.

Middle English faren, from Old English faran; akin to Old High German faran to go, Latin portare to carry, Greek peran to pass through, poros passage, journey.

First Known Use: before 12th century

 

Wikipedia Beyond Cold Fusion: A Journey Into the Depths of Wiki Science

It has been noted by many that the Wikipedia Cold Fusion article is not a good source for those seeking information on the art of this science. The Wiki article quibbles as to whether cold fusion research is actually science. The Wiki article also does not recognize the peer review process of LENR-CANR.org or other cold fusion science journals; seeing them as publications by a group of self promoting crackpot scientists, deluding us and each other with dreams of infinite energy akin to perpetual motion, i.e. pseudoscience. This limits valid source material, turning Wiki Cold Fusion into a battle ground and a poor encyclopedic science article with a very low Wiki rating.

To get to the heart of this matter, we will go beyond the surface of the field of battle at the Wiki cold fusion article and find, there in the depths of Wikipedia, the workings of the science behind the clean low energy nuclear reaction environment; now emerging into the marketplace as popular ‘cold fusion’ LENR energy.

It is heartening to find, in Wikipedia, science that challenges known theory; and which confirms the science and the physics surrounding the low energy nuclear reaction. Here we have proof that the coverage of cutting edge cold fusion research has been sorely mistreated by the senior Wiki editors who ride that post. Explore the depths of  Wiki science and find that nowhere else is cutting edge research which challenges known theory thrown into such a battleground of contention, as is found at the Wikipedia article about Cold Fusion… Now, why with recent developments is this so?

 

Explore Key Words at Wiki From This Cold Fusion (LENR) Patent

“Method for Producing Heavy Electrons”, NASA LENR Patent (USPTO link)

Surface plasmons (SPs), Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), Resonant frequency, Heavy electrons, Metal hydride, Fractal geometry, Energy, Unconventional superconductivity, Weak antiferromagnetism, Pseudo metamagnetism, Hydrogenated/deuterated molecular structures such as graphane and its nanotube variants, Quasi-crystalline arrays, Metamaterials, Dusty plasmas

Surface plasmons (SPs) are coherent electron oscillations that exist at the interface between any two materials where the real part of the dielectric function changes sign across the interface (e.g. a metal-dielectric interface, such as a metal sheet in air). SPs have lower energy than bulk (or volume) plasmons which quantise the longitudinal electron oscillations about positive ion cores within the bulk of an electron gas (or plasma). The existence of surface plasmons was first predicted in 1957 by Rufus Ritchie. In the following two decades, surface plasmons were extensively studied by many scientists, the foremost of whom were T. Turbadar in the 1950s and 1960s, and Heinz Raether, E. Kretschmann, and A. Otto in the 1960s and 1970s. Information transfer in nanoscale structures, similar to photonics, by means of surface plasmons, is referred to as plasmonics. Surface plasmons can be excited by both electrons and photons. (Wiki)

Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), are infrared or visible frequency electromagnetic waves trapped at or guided along metal-dielectric interfaces. These are shorter in wavelength than the incident light (photons). Hence, SPPs can provide a significant reduction in effective wavelength and a corresponding significant increase in spatial confinement and local field intensity. Collective charge oscillations at the boundary between an insulating dielectric medium (such as air or glass) and a metal (such as gold, silver or copper) are able to sustain the propagation of infrared or visible frequency electromagnetic waves known as surface plasmon-polaritons (SPP). SPPs are guided along metal-dielectric interfaces much in the same way light can be guided by an optical fiber, with the unique characteristic of subwavelength-scale confinement perpendicular to the interface. Surface plasmons (not SPPs), occur as light induced packets of electrical charges collectively oscillate at the surfaces of metals at optical frequencies.

Under specific conditions, the light that radiates the object (incident light) couples with the surface plasmons to create self-sustaining, propagating electromagnetic waves known as surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs). Once launched, the SPPs ripple along the metal-dielectric interface and do not stray from this narrow path. Compared with the incident light that triggered the transformation, the SPPs can be much shorter in wavelength. In other words, when SPs couple with a photon, the resulting hybridised excitation is called a surface plasmon polariton (SPP). This SPP can propagate along the surface of a metal until energy is lost either via absorption in the metal or radiation into free-space. (Wiki)

Resonant frequencies In physics, resonance is the tendency of a system to oscillate with greater amplitude at some frequencies than at others. Frequencies at which the response amplitude is a relative maximum are known as the system’s resonant frequencies, or resonance frequencies. At these frequencies, even small periodic driving forces can produce large amplitude oscillations, because the system stores vibrational energy. Resonance occurs when a system is able to store and easily transfer energy between two or more different storage modes (such as kinetic energy and potential energy in the case of a pendulum). Resonance phenomena occur with all types of vibrations or waves: there is mechanical resonance, acoustic resonance, electromagnetic resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), electron spin resonance (ESR), and resonance of quantum wave functions. (Wiki)

Muons (mu mesons aka heavy electrons) Muons are denoted by μ− and antimuons by μ+. Muons were previously called mu mesons, but are not classified as mesons by modern particle physicists (see History). Muons have a mass of 105.7 MeV/c2, which is about 200 times the mass of an electron. Since the muon’s interactions are very similar to those of the electron, a muon can be thought of as a much heavier version of the electron. The eventual recognition of the “mu meson” muon as a simple “heavy electron” with no role at all in the nuclear interaction, seemed so incongruous and surprising at the time, that Nobel laureate I. I. Rabi famously quipped, “Who ordered that?” Muonic helium is created by substituting a muon for one of the electrons in helium-4. The muon orbits much closer to the nucleus, so muonic helium can therefore be regarded like an isotope of hydrogen whose nucleus consists of two neutrons, two protons and a muon, with a single electron outside. Colloquially, it could be called “hydrogen 4.1”, since the mass of the muon is roughly 0.1 au. Chemically, muonic helium, possessing an unpaired valence electron, can bond with other atoms, and behaves more like a hydrogen atom than an inert helium atom. A positive muon, when stopped in ordinary matter, can also bind an electron and form an exotic atom known as muonium (Mu) atom, in which the muon acts as the nucleus. The positive muon, in this context, can be considered a pseudo-isotope of hydrogen with one ninth of the mass of the proton. Because the reduced mass of muonium, and hence its Bohr radius, is very close to that of hydrogen, this short-lived “atom” behaves chemically — to a first approximation — like hydrogen, deuterium and tritium. Since the production of muons requires an available center of momentum frame energy of 105.7 MeV, neither ordinary radioactive decay events nor nuclear fission and fusion events (such as those occurring in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons) are energetic enough to produce muons. Only nuclear fission produces single-nuclear-event energies in this range, but does not produce muons as the production of a single muon is possible only through the weak interaction, which does not take part in a nuclear fission. (Wiki)

Metal hydrides Complex metal hydrides are salts wherein the anions contain hydrides. In the older chemical literature as well as contemporary materials science textbooks, a “metal hydride” is assumed to be nonmolecular, i.e. three-dimensional lattices of atomic ions. In such systems, hydrides are often interstitial and nonstoichiometric, and the bonding between the metal and hydrogen atoms is significantly ionic. In contrast, complex metal hydrides typically contain more than one type of metal or metalloid and may be soluble but invariably react with water. (Wiki)

Fractal Geometry One often cited description that Mandelbrot published to describe geometric fractals is “a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole”; this is generally helpful but limited. Authorities disagree on the exact definition of fractal, but most usually elaborate on the basic ideas of self-similarity and an unusual relationship with the space a fractal is embedded in. One point agreed on is that fractal patterns are characterized by fractal dimensions, but whereas these numbers quantify complexity (i.e., changing detail with changing scale), they neither uniquely describe nor specify details of how to construct particular fractal patterns. Multifractal scaling: characterized by more than one fractal dimension or scaling rule. Fine or detailed structure at arbitrarily small scales. A consequence of this structure is fractals may have emergent properties; irregularity locally and globally that is not easily described in traditional Euclidean geometric language. (Wiki)

Energy In physics, energy is an indirectly observed quantity which comes in many forms, such as kinetic energy, potential energy, radiant energy, and many others; which are listed in this summary article. This is a major topic in science and technology and this article gives an overview of its major aspects, and provides links to the many specific articles about energy in its different forms and contexts. The question “what is energy?” is difficult to answer in a simple, intuitive way, although energy can be rigorously defined in theoretical physics. In the words of Richard Feynman, “It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount.”   Whenever physical scientists discover that a certain phenomenon appears to violate the law of energy conservation, new forms may be added, as is the case with dark energy, a hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space and tends to increase the rate of expansion of the universe. (Wiki)

Unconventional Superconductors are materials that display superconductivity which does not conform to either the conventional BCS theory or the Nikolay Bogolyubov’s theory or its extensions. After more than twenty years of intensive research the origin of high-temperature superconductivity is still not clear, but it seems that instead of electron-phonon attraction mechanisms, as in conventional superconductivity, one is dealing with genuine electronic mechanisms (e.g. by antiferromagnetic correlations), and instead of s-wave pairing, d-waves are substantial. One goal of all this research is room-temperature superconductivity . A room-temperature superconductor is a hypothetical material which would be capable of exhibiting superconductivity at operating temperatures above 0° C (273.15 K). While this is not strictly “room temperature” (which would be approx. 20–25 °C), it is the temperature at which ice forms and can be reached and maintained easily in an everyday environment. At present, the highest temperature superconducting materials are the cuprates, which have demonstrated superconductivity at atmospheric pressure at temperatures as high as -135 °C (138 K). It is unknown whether any material exhibiting room-temperature superconductivity exists. The interest in its discovery arises from the repeated discovery of superconductivity at temperatures previously unexpected or held to be impossible. The potential benefits for society and science if such a material did exist are profound. (Wiki)

Weak antiferromagnetism One of the fundamental properties of an electron (besides that it carries charge) is that it has a dipole moment, i.e., it behaves itself as a tiny magnet. This dipole moment comes from the more fundamental property of the electron that it has quantum mechanical spin. The quantum mechanical nature of this spin causes the electron to only be able to be in two states, with the magnetic field either pointing “up” or “down” (for any choice of up and down). The spin of the electrons in atoms is the main source of ferromagnetism, although there is also a contribution from the orbital angular momentum of the electron about the nucleus. When these tiny magnetic dipoles are aligned in the same direction, their individual magnetic fields add together to create a measurable macroscopic field. However, in materials with a filled electron shell, the total dipole moment of the electrons is zero because the spins are in up/down pairs. Only atoms with partially filled shells (i.e., unpaired spins) can have a net magnetic moment, so ferromagnetism only occurs in materials with partially filled shells. Because of Hund’s rules, the first few electrons in a shell tend to have the same spin, thereby increasing the total dipole moment. These unpaired dipoles (often called simply “spins” even though they also generally include angular momentum) tend to align in parallel to an external magnetic field, an effect called paramagnetism. Ferromagnetism involves an additional phenomenon, however: The dipoles tend to align spontaneously, giving rise to a spontaneous magnetization, even when there is no applied field. Diamagnetism Diamagnetism is a magnetic response shared by all substances. In response to an applied magnetic field, electrons precess (see Larmor precession), and by Lenz’s law they act to shield the interior of a body from themagnetic field. Thus, the moment produced is in the opposite direction to the field and the susceptibility is negative. This effect is weak but independent of temperature. A substance whose only magnetic response is diamagnetism is called a diamagnet. Paramagnetism Paramagnetism is a weak positive response to a magnetic field due to rotation of electron spins. Paramagnetism occurs in certain kinds of iron-bearing minerals because the iron contains an unpaired electron in one of their shells (see Hund’s rules). Some are paramagnetic down to absolute zero and their susceptibility is inversely proportional to the temperature (see Curie’s law); others are magnetically ordered below a critical temperature and the susceptibility increases as it approaches that temperature (see Curie-Weiss law). Ferromagnetism Collectively, strongly magnetic materials are often referred to as ferromagnets. However, this magnetism can arise as the result of more than one kind of magnetic order. In the strict sense, ferromagnetism refers to magnetic ordering where neighboring electron spins are aligned by the exchange interaction. Below a critical temperature called the Curie temperature, ferromagnets have a spontaneous magnetization and there is hysteresis in their response to a changing magnetic field. Most importantly for rock magnetism, they have remanence, so they can record the Earth’s field. Iron does not occur widely in its pure form. It is usually incorporated into iron oxides, oxyhydroxides and sulfides. In these compounds, the iron atoms are not close enough for direct exchange, so they are coupled by indirect exchange or superexchange. The result is that the crystal lattice is divided into two or more sublattices with different moments. Ferrimagetism Ferrimagnets have two sublattices with opposing moments. One sublattice has a larger moment, so there is a net unbalance. Ferrimagnets often behave like ferromagnets, but the temperature dependence of their spontaneous magnetization can be quite different. Louis Néel identified four types of temperature dependence, one of which involves a reversal of the magnetization. This phenomenon played a role in controversies over marine magnetic anomalies. Antiferromagnetism Antiferromagnets, like ferrimagnets, have two sublattices with opposing moments, but now the moments are equal in magnitude. If the moments are exactly opposed, the magnet has no remanence. However, the moments can be tilted (spin canting), resulting in a moment nearly at right angles to the moments of the sublattices. (Wiki)

Metamagnetism is a blanket term used loosely in physics to describe a sudden (often, dramatic) increase in the magnetization of a material with a small change in an externally applied magnetic field. The metamagnetic behavior may have quite different physical causes for different types of metamagnets. Some examples of physical mechanisms leading to metamagnetic behavior are: Itinerant Metamagnetism – Exchange splitting of the Fermi surface in a paramagnetic system of itinerant electrons causes an energetically favorable transition to bulk magnetization near the transition to a ferromagnet or other magnetically ordered state.  Antiferromagnetic Transition – Field-induced spin flips in antiferromagnets cascade at a critical energy determined by the applied magnetic field. Depending on the material and experimental conditions, metamagnetism may be associated with a first-order phase transition, a continuous phase transition at a critical point(classical or quantum), or crossovers beyond a critical point that do not involve a phase transition at all. These wildly different physical explanations sometimes lead to confusion as to what the term “metamagnetic” is referring in specific cases. (Wiki)

Graphane is a two-dimensional polymer of carbon and hydrogen with the formula unit (CH)n where n is large. Graphane should not be confused with graphene, a two-dimensional form of carbon alone. Graphane is a form of hydrogenated graphene. Graphane’s carbon bonds are in sp3 configuration, as opposed to graphene’s sp2 bond configuration, thus graphane is a two-dimensional analog of cubic diamond. The first theoretical description of graphane was reported in 2003 and its preparation was reported in 2009. Full hydrogenation from both sides of a graphene sheet results in graphane, but partial hydrogenation leads to hydrogenated graphene. If graphene rests on a silica surface, hydrogenation on only one side of graphene preserves the hexagonal symmetry in graphane. One-sided hydrogenation of graphene becomes possible due to the existence of ripplings. Because the latter are distributed randomly, obtained graphane is expected to be disordered material in contrast to two-sided graphane. If Annealing allows the hydrogen to disperse, reverting to graphene. Note: p-doped graphane is postulated to be a high-temperature BCS theory superconductor with a Tc above 90 K. (Wiki)

Surface Layering (quasi-crystalline arrays) Surface layering is a quasi-crystalline structure at the surfaces of otherwise disordered liquids, where atoms or molecules of even the simplest liquid are stratified into well-defined layers parallel to the surface. While in crystalline solids such atomic layers can extend periodically throughout the entire dimension of a crystal, surface layering decays rapidly away from the surface and is limited to just a few near-surface region layers. Another difference between surface layering and crystalline structure is that atoms or molecules of surface-layered liquids are not ordered in-plane, while in crystalline solids they are. Surface layering was predicted theoretically by Stuart Rice at the University of Chicago in 1983 and has been experimentally discovered by Peter Pershan (Harvard) and his group, working in collaboration with Ben Ocko (Brookhaven) and Moshe Deutsch (Bar-Ilan) in 1995 in elemental liquid mercury and liquid gallium using x-ray reflectivity techniques. More recently layering has been shown to arise from electronic properties of metallic liquids, rather than thermodynamic variables such as surface tension, since surfaces of low-surface tension metallic liquids such as liquid potassium are layered, while those of dielectric liquids such as water, are not. (Wiki)

Metamaterials are artificial materials engineered to have properties that may not be found in nature. They are assemblies of multiple individual elements fashioned from conventional microscopic materials such as metals or plastics, but the materials are usually arranged in periodic patterns. Metamaterials gain their properties not from their composition, but from their exactingly-designed structures. Their precise shape, geometry, size, orientation and arrangement can affect the waves of light or sound in an unconventional manner, creating material properties which are unachievable with conventional materials.  These metamaterials achieve desired effects by incorporating structural elements of sub-wavelength sizes, i.e. features that are actually smaller than the wavelength of the waves they affect. (Wiki)

Plasmonic metamaterials are metamaterials that exploit surface plasmons, which are produced from the interaction of light with metal-dielectric materials. Under specific conditions, the incident light couples with the surface plasmons to create self-sustaining, propagating electromagnetic waves known as surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs). Once launched, the SPPs ripple along the metal-dielectric interface and do not stray from this narrow path. Compared with the incident light that triggered the transformation, the SPPs can be much shorter in wavelength. By fabricating such metamaterials fundamental limits tied to the wavelength of light are overcome. Light hitting a metamaterial is transformed into electromagnetic waves of a different variety—surface plasmon polaritons, which are shorter in wavelength than the incident light. This transformation leads to unusual and counterintuitive properties that might be harnessed for practical use. Moreover, new approaches that simplify the fabrication process of metamaterials are under development. This work also includes making new structures specifically designed to enable measurements of the materials novel properties. Furthermore, nanotechnology applications of these nanostructures are currently being researched, including microscopy beyond the diffraction limit. (Wiki)

Dusty Plasmas A dusty plasma is a plasma containing millimeter (10−3) to nanometer (10−9) sized particles suspended in it. Dust particles are charged and the plasma and particles behave as a plasma. Dust particles may form larger particles resulting in “grain plasmas”. Due to the additional complexity of studying plasmas with charged dust particles, dusty plasmas are also known as Complex Plasmas. Dusty plasmas are interesting because the presence of particles significantly alters the charged particle equilibrium leading to different phenomena. It is a field of current research. Electrostatic coupling between the grains can vary over a wide range so that the states of the dusty plasma can change from weakly coupled (gaseous) to crystalline. Such plasmas are of interest as a non-Hamiltonian system of interacting particles and as a means to study generic fundamental physics of self-organization, pattern formation, phase transitions, and scaling. (Wiki)

This brings us to the end of our exploration for now (there will be more of this Wiki series in the near future)

I hope you have enjoyed the trip. When reading the NASA LENR – Cold Fusion Patent after completing this journey,  you may be surprised at the depth of your new insight. Also, please remember, when informing others about LENR – Cold Fusion Energy be sure to tell them… “Explore beyond the surface of ‘Wikipedia Cold Fusion’ and take a journey into the depths of Wiki science.”

Thanks,

Greg Goble

 

HEY! Visit http://lenr-canr.org/ This site features a library of papers on LENR, Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, also known as Cold Fusion. (CANR, Chemically Assisted Nuclear Reactions is another term for this phenomenon.) The library includes more than 1,000 original scientific papers reprinted with permission from the authors and publishers. The papers are linked to a bibliography of over 3,500 journal papers, news articles, and books (they even have  few quality encyclopedia articles) about LENR Science and Engineering… Popularly known as ‘cold fusion’ now… Forever historically speaking that is.

 

NEXT

LENR Sister Field – Thermoelectric Energy

Soon I will take us back in time to the field of invention of Harold Aspden, the father of efficient thermoelectric energy devices; the likes of which power NASA deep space probes. Key words in his breakthrough patent are worth noting as they are common to the science and the environment of cold fusion phenomenon. Harold Aspden was fascinated by cold fusion as well as the biological transmutation of elements, seeing them as relevant to his field… the science of thermoelectric energy conversion.

 

Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft Architecture – LENR Cold Fusion

George Miley is poised to harness electricity from LENR without a Rankine or Carnot cycle and utilize it to power Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft.  Coincidentally NASA released its latest posting about LENR technology on its Climate Change site. NASA sees LENR as the solution to global warming and planned space missions yet unrealized.

Colonization of the solar system is the goal. (Deep Space Industries) and (Planetary Resources Inc.) WOW!

I’m also excited to share with you the latest video in the following climate conversation series, The Price of Carbon. This short video, narrated by comedian and musician Reggie Watts, underscores the high cost we are all already paying for carbon pollution.

Posted by Maggie L. Fox – President & CEO – The Climate Reality Project

“From Superstorm Sandy to soaring temperatures in Australia, ongoing drought that has parched more than 60% of the U.S., and flooding from hurricanes around the world, we are experiencing the consequences of our carbon pollution now. We are paying the cost of these dirty weather disasters and other climate impacts through taxes, medical bills, and insurance rates (to name just a few). It’s past time to talk about the real cost of carbon pollution and to take action so that the polluters are paying their fair share.”

“In the spirit of moving forward to solve the climate crisis, it’s time to jump-start a real carbon conversation. Watch the video. Share it with your friends. Be part of the carbon conversation.”

Be sure to mention that Cold Fusion research is NOW emerging as LENR Engineering.

“Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft Architecture”  (link) 

NASA-NIAC 2001 PHASE I RESEARCH GRANT

Final Research Activity Report (SEPTEMBER 2012) P.I.: Alfonso G. Tarditi
Collaborators: John H. Scott, George H. Miley – University of Houston – Clear Lake, Houston

This research is not about exploring a new fusion energy concept, it actually assumes the availability of an aneutronic fusion energy reactor. The focus is on providing the best (most efficient) utilization of fusion energy for propulsion purposes.”

Mr. Miley has been awarded a U.S. patent for an LENR energy device… the “assumption” of a “new fusion energy concept” is correct.

An Ambitious Goal

“This Phase I study is targeting a new spacecraft architecture to enable an unprecedented range of mission capabilities that, for the purpose of simple comparison, can be summarized as 10 times faster, 10 times further, and 10 times heavier with respect to the current state of the art. The improved traveling capabilities offer new, exciting mission possibilities and, in fact, an entire new paradigm for approaching the solar system exploration and colonization.”

Of Particular Interest Is this from section 4.6

“Fission Hybrid Interim Concept” (uranium fission/aneutronic fusion)

A system level analysis that extends the Phase I system level study shall be conducted including compact fission reactor performance for state-of-the-art and near-term foreseeable designs. This particular investigation is aimed at providing a high-level assessment of the “a” obtainable for different scenarios in which fission power provides all or part of the energy required for running the aneutronic fusion core and producing the ion flow.

 

I surmise a new approach…

“Fusion Hybrid Interim Concept”

(LENR fusion/aneutronic fusion)

George H. Miley proposes to replace conventional NASA fission power units with existing LENR fusion thermoelectric technology.

This new approach applied to Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft Architecture may be summarized as where LENR fusion thermoelectric power provides all or part of the energy required for running the aneutronic fusion core and producing the ion flow.

 

NASA Goals for LENR: “The Nuclear Reactor in Your Basement”

 

NASA Has LENR Patents

NASA Glenn Research Center Experience with LENR Phenomenon 

Author:Wrbanek, Susan Y.; Fralick, Gustave C.; Wrbanek, John D.; Niedra, Janis M.
Abstract:Since 1989 NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) has performed some small-scale limited experiments that show evidence of effects claimed by some to be evidence of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR). The research at GRC has involved observations and work on measurement techniques for observing the temperature effects in reactions of isotopes of hydrogen with palladium hydrides. The various experiments performed involved loading Pd with gaseous H2 and D2, and exposing Pd thin films to multi-bubble sonoluminescence in regular and deuterated water. An overview of these experiments and their results will be presented. Collection:NASA NASA Center:Glenn Research Center Publication Date:May 2012 Document ID:20130001794 Subject Category:PHYSICS (GENERAL) Report/Patent Number:GRC-E-DAA-TN5141

Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research Phase II: N+4 Advanced Concept Development

Author:Bradley, Marty K.; Droney, Christopher K. Abstract:This final report documents the work of the Boeing Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) team on Task 1 of the Phase II effort. The team consisted of Boeing Research and Technology, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, General Electric, and Georgia Tech. Using a quantitative workshop process, the following technologies, appropriate to aircraft operational in the N+4 2040 timeframe, were identified: Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Hydrogen, fuel cell hybrids, battery electric hybrids, Low Energy Nuclear (LENR), boundary layer ingestion propulsion (BLI), unducted fans and advanced propellers, and combinations. Technology development plans were developed. Collection:NASA NASA Center:Langley Research Center Publication Date:May 2012  Report/Patent Number:NASA/CR-2012-217556, NF1676L-14434

The 2013 President’s (Budget)

Funding Highlights:

Provides $27.2 billion in discretionary funds, a 3.2 percent increase above the 2012 enacted level. This request includes increased funding for priority areas such as clean energy, research and development to spur innovation, and advanced manufacturing. Savings and efficiencies are achieved through cuts to inefficient and outdated fossil fuel subsidies, low-priority and low-performing programs, and by concentrating resources on full utilization of existing facilities and infrastructure.

Increases funding for applied research, development, and demonstration in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The Budget also maintains and expands funding for the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. These investments in high-performing programs will help position the United States as a world leader in the clean energy economy, and create the foundation for new industries and new jobs.

Improves the competitiveness of U.S. industries by more than doubling research and development on advanced manufacturing processes and advanced industrial materials, enabling companies to cut costs by using less energy while improving product quality.

Works through the President’s Better Building Initiative to make non-residential buildings more energy efficient by catalyzing private sector investment. Creates jobs through mandatory funding for HomeStar incentives to consumers to make their homes more energy efficient.

Promotes basic research through $5 billion in funding to the Office of Science.

Positions the Environmental Management program to meet its legally enforceable cleanup commitments at sites across the country.

Continues investments to maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear weapons stockpile in support of the planned decrease in deployed U.S. and Russian weapons under the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

Strengthens national security through funding for securing, disposing of, and detecting nuclear and radiological material worldwide.

Thank you Walker for the following…

 

“With the head scientist at NASA Langley research saying LENR is confirmed along with confirmation from Labs at Toyota, Mitsubishi, and STMicroelectronics as well as Amaco, the US Navy research labs, along with a course on the Fleischmann/Pons effect at MIT and working replications of the Celani reactor at academic sites around the world as well as hundreds of confirmed and peer reviewed experimental paper, that professors and Nobel prize winners are saying it is real and that Patents now being granted, the case that LENR is a real working system of cold fusion is proven.”


LENR Proof

The fact that…

“Oil companies like BP, Shell, Exon, and a host of others are all selling off their oil fields around the world, that Petrobas who spent a decade to aquire the controling interest in a texas oil refinery, now are desperate to sell it at a loss.”

“The fact that Nuclear power plant owners are cancelling their big investment projects, and preparing to close their plants.”

“It is well known that the major players are on a divestment and diversification strategy. Many are giving various excuses, but when you check them they do not pan out. We are shifting to US based fields is a common one, but when you look they have bought options to consider buying or leases rather than the asset.”

“That is key no buying only renting. You rent assets when the asset value is about to take a hit. And the total US Proven reserves does not add up to what has been sold.”

Shell has been on a massive divestment strategy on its oil field assets, from Africa to the Far East for the last 12 months, or since Rossi did his first demonstration this time last year.”

“Other Fossil Fuel companies on a divestment strategy are BP who are selling their stakes in fields in the North Sea, Russia, the Arctic and the Gulf to name but a few and not even batting an eyelid about being refused license to buy future assets in the Gulf. (link) (link) and (link)

Connoco

“Exxon  (link) (link) (link) and (link)

“Even the pipeline parts and refinery companies are joining the rush to divest the fossil fuel business.”

“Do a Google search for any oil company and the phrase “Oil field” and the words divest or sell.

“Some are trying to cover their strategy and the risk by divesting half of the asset others are just cashing in their chips.”

“This year has been an Oil Field Night of the Long Knives as all the major players have been dumping these soon to be seriously downgraded assets.”

“The price per barrel dropped 20+ dollars since May.”

“I expect the real drop to be when the 60 day and 30 Day options on the price per barrel get shorted when the Rossi announcement is about to be made. I expect the price per barrel will drop below 70. Then it will resurge as people realise LENR will not happen overnight.”

“Then Oil and other fossil fuels will go into a long decline with investors on a business decline strategy making money out of the asset stripping and running the oil fields into the ground. Natural Gas will be the longest lived of the Fossil Fuel assets.”

“Coal might die out out in as little a year and a half as converting coal power plants to use Rossi’s Hot Cat or other LENR tech will be very easy. Oil will be next. Converting all power plants could take a 5 to 7 years but the fact that President Obama changed the Law to allow Combined Heat and Power means that many plants will end up being scrapped before they can convert, as faster cheaper more nimble competitors will create power plants on customers door steps, that provide power at a tenth but theoretically at up to one thousandth of the cost.”

“With regard to Nuclear and Green power the same applies Siemans dropped all their Nuclear industry like a hot potato after September 2011 others followed suit. Siemans also dropped their $33bn green business.”

“Buckle up people its about to get bumpy.”

Thanks Walker – Cold Fusion Now – LENR Engineering

QUEMA (fire) Q.uantum U.nlimited E.nergy M.anufacturers A.ssociation – coldfusionnow.org2012

By the by…

A few of the many other patents involving George H. Miley… impressive.

 

How many LENR patents have been filed and not published yet? None of us Know!

Here are a few published in the U.S.

The US New Patent Law: March 16, 2013

Library David standing IMG_1798The following is a further posting in a series of articles by David French, a patent attorney with 35 years experience, which will review issues of interest touching on the field of Cold Fusion.

I have been hesitating posting on advances in ColdFusion – LENR because I am still in learning mode as to what is going on. But a new topic has come up in which I do feel I have some strength. Key amendments to the US Patent Law signed by President Obama on September 16, 2010 will come into effect on March 16, 2012. This posting is to provide guidance to those who fear that some kind of revolution or collapse is likely to occur.

These US Patent Law amendments are often represented as a change from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file system for handling conflicting filings. This is part of the truth. However this feature in itself is not going to affect most patent applicants. First-to-file has been the law in Europe for essentially 100 years. Canada adopted this style of law in 1989. Not much changed in Canada after the transition. Conflicts occur in less than 1% of filings, significantly less, in both countries.

Of greater significance will be the standard of world-wide novelty tied to the filing date. Applications filed at the US Patent Office before March 16, 2012 will only be valid if directed to things:

1. Not described a printed publication issuing anywhere in the world
2. Not in public use in the United States, and
3. Not on sale in the United States

Such event must not have occurred before the inventor’s date of invention and certainly for not more than one year before the US filing date.

Under the new law, patent filings will only be valid if directed to things not previously “made available to the public” anywhere in the world, in any manner whatsoever, before the applicant establishes a patent filing date describing how to build what they have invented. This type of patenting requirement is called “Absolute World Novelty”. In terms of newness, your idea will have to be pristine on the planet Earth in order to obtain a patent.

Under the previous system inventors were misinformed if they thought that merely thinking of an idea reserved their right to obtain a patent for a year. Only inventors who communicated to someone else a complete idea with a disclosure that would allow the idea to be put into effect qualified as having conceived an invention. And then you had to follow-up expeditiously to either build a prototype or file a patent application. These requirements were traps in the old system, now to be left behind, that many innocent inventors did not appreciate.

In place will be the new requirement that you have to make your disclosure in a patent filing. Once this understanding is established, inventors will be far more likely to base their patent applications on written documents that will support truly valid patent rights. The new system will require inventors to sit-down and figure out what it is exactly that they want to patent. For $175 they will be able to place a Provisional application on file at the US Patent Office, reserving their right to file a better and more elaborate “story” within the following year. Once the final patent application is filed by the end of that year, the “story” will be frozen. Therefore inventors should understand that they had better get it right, and they only have a year to do so.

Here is a good practice procedure for inventors to follow. Plan on using a patent attorney. Even if you prepare and file an initial application yourself, please consult with one to make sure that you are not wasting your time and to ensure that you have someone to fall-back upon when you need to do the final document.

Search, search, search to determine the feature of your idea that is new. You always patent a feature that must be new even though it is described as being part of a machine or process or article. The critical feature is the difference that makes your idea new. You need to know what has been done before so you do not waste time and money trying to patent something that cannot be patented. Even if you manage to get by the patent Examiner, your patent will be invalid if it fails to address something that is new.

Furthermore, that difference which makes it new should make a difference in terms of the relevance of your invention. This is not a topic your patent agent will raise with you on his/her own initiative. It is up to you to decide whether your idea has market value. It is up to you to find out whether your potential patent rights will be worth the $10,000 – $20,000 you will be spending on them. Your patent will have no value if your invention does not succeed.

Once you have the search results, if you think you have a feature that is new, write the whole story of how to build something that works that includes that feature. There is no harm writing it in the form of a patent disclosure, although that is not essential to make a US Provisional filing. But the template recommended by the US Patent Office for a patent disclosure will get you focused on only writing things that are relevant to getting a patent. Do not promote your ideas as being better; do not make promises that are not needed.

You only have to describe how to build something that works so others can do so later when the patent expires. If you are filing for a Cold Fusion invention, the Examiner will ask you to prove that your invention works and that your disclosure is sufficient. And you must ensure that there is a feature present in what you have described that makes the overall process or article or machine new. File that write-up as a Provisional application at the US Patent Office; cost: $175.

Now do something that may hurt. Send that written description to a professional Searcher and have them do a search. This could cost reasonably $800- $1000 dollars for an invention that is not too complicated. If you use your attorney, they will add another thousand dollars to interpret the results of the search. But either way, you should read the results of the search very carefully. The search will have succeeded if it locates a disclosure of your not-so novel idea. You want all the bad news to come out now, at the beginning. But if you do receive bad news, it is not over.

Read all the references that the Searcher produces. Every prior inventor is a mentor and coach available to provide guidance to subsequent inventors. Understand what they thought was new and useful in your field. Think about your idea and how to modify it. There is no invention that cannot be modified. And if you are lucky, you can modify your invention both to make it better and to focus it on a different novel aspect that does have a prospect of being patented.

If you carry-out this process carefully you will understand your invention better and almost certainly will have some further good ideas. Re-file another application, at the cost of another $175. Every time you think of a really good new idea re-file the application adding the idea to the prior document. There are many cases where applicants have filed 20 and 30 times during the year following the initial filing. This is what Randell Mills does. Then at the end of the year pull everything together into one document that you take to your patent attorney, with two months to go, and work with your patent attorney to do the final filing papers.

Once the final application is on file, there is nothing more the inventor can do to improve that filing. Further filings will be possible, but they will have to address different ideas. You have to get it right in that first year; it will be your last chance for the basic idea.

That is enough guidance on understanding how to respond to the new US Patent Law. Many many inventors waste a lot of money on patents, and on inventions that are never going to pay-off. But if you learn to understand the basics, hardly more than what is set out in this post, you will be well on the road to both making inventions that count and obtaining patent rights that can potentially be very profitable.

Top