President Obama and LENR Energy – Cold Fusion Now

6 Replies to “President Obama and LENR Energy – Cold Fusion Now”

1. A couple of years ago, when Rossi was new on the scene, and Black Light Power was the big news, I asked the Shadow Minister of Energy in Great Britain what he thought of LENR, and he replies that this was but one of many exciting breakthrough energy technologies that will hit the market in the coming years.

   http://news.newenergytimes.net/2014/01/03/u-s-department-of-energy-invites-submission-of-lenr-proposals/

   New Energy Times is reporting that the DOE is now entertaining LENR proposals.

   I have done extensive surveying of people concerning LENR, and to a person they really don’t know what to do with such information. It isn’t like fracking or North Dakota oil production, which is in the realm of consensus reality. Therefore, my opinion (it would be harder to get an answer from Obama than it would my state’s two US Senators, or even my US House Representative, whose person I met to inform about LENR) is that they might have a vague sense of LENR, but because it seems to-good-to-be-true, they won’t touch it with a ten foot pole.

   No, the mass media would have to give LENR it’s blessing for politicians to start going on record about it. In some sense this is very rational, since it will be highly disruptive to the market. Very frustrating though, especially to someone like me who has devoted so much time and energy trying to get it into the public arena.

2. Brad, may I ask, do you not think that the main responsibility regarding the acceptance of Cold Fusion lies with science.
   One Truthful unbiased, competent report in one of the premier science comics and the media and governments would be forced to respond.
   I ask why there seems to be an effort to remove science from the Fact that it has demonstrated with Cold Fusion and many other subjects the worst corruption and incompetence possible.

   1. Clearly from reading the book Excess Heat by Charles Beaudette (a monument, yet boring like an ICC trial transcription),

      http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/lenr%20home%20page/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf

      it is clear the guiltness is of few
      1)outspoken
      2)US
      3)Nuclear
      4)Physicist
      who pretended to be sure, who denied any reality to calorimetry, who stuck to their theoretical point of view.

      they captured the truth and did all the evil.
      non US, non nuclear, non physicist, non outspoken people did not do the evil.
      even Nature and Science were terrorized by those outspoken US nuclear physicist.

      all the scientific community, the science comics, the media, the politicians get terrorized by those egotistic clowns.

      Charles Beaudette say it with more softness… But it is what anyone honest can conclude from his “report”.

3. Please have a look at e-Cat Site the articles : “Belgian LANR Patents”, LANR by Coulomb Explosion” and
   “Cold Fusion Catalyst” and explain me the interest of the Belgian Ministry of Defence.

4. Bill Hicks.
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44igxBBtXpA

5. If President Obama isn’t aware of LENR developments at MIT his Secretary of Energy certainly is.
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Moniz

Comments are closed.