Comments for COLD FUSION NOW! http://coldfusionnow.org - Free Energy For All Mankind! Sun, 26 May 2013 04:23:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 Comment on Cold Fusion Radio by Cold Fusion Radio James Martinez on Rossi report: “This is a gift for humanity” | COLD FUSION NOW! http://coldfusionnow.org/cold-fusion-radio/#comment-16204 Cold Fusion Radio James Martinez on Rossi report: “This is a gift for humanity” | COLD FUSION NOW! Sun, 26 May 2013 04:23:30 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?page_id=23346#comment-16204 [...] Cold Fusion Radio [...]

]]> Comment on The Experimental Investigation of the E-Cat HT, and Heuristics by Dr. Mike http://coldfusionnow.org/the-experimental-investigation-of-the-e-cat-ht-and-heuristics/#comment-16076 Dr. Mike Sat, 25 May 2013 03:21:01 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34974#comment-16076 Brad,
Very well said!

]]> Comment on The Experimental Investigation of the E-Cat HT, and Heuristics by Slammer http://coldfusionnow.org/the-experimental-investigation-of-the-e-cat-ht-and-heuristics/#comment-16014 Slammer Fri, 24 May 2013 16:36:10 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34974#comment-16014 It is clear the empirical evidence supports the claim of the excess heat production, while the theoretical basis is protected by trade secret. Those working for competitors would love to see the contents revealed, and would try to force this through selective ‘skepticism’, however because of the nature of the investigative panel and the duration of the tests it is also clear that no additional power source, hidden wires, or batteries could have been used. So they have simply determined that the Rossi effect is real. So, in spite of the skeptics I must now side with Mr. Rossi. The device operates as claimed, the world now needs to move forward with this.

]]> Comment on The Experimental Investigation of the E-Cat HT, and Heuristics by Ruby Carat http://coldfusionnow.org/the-experimental-investigation-of-the-e-cat-ht-and-heuristics/#comment-16009 Ruby Carat Fri, 24 May 2013 16:03:15 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34974#comment-16009 I am discovering that “skeptics” do not even read this report. That disqualifies them from having an opinion at all!

]]> Comment on Rossi E-Cat HT energy density “off-the-chart” by Ruby Carat http://coldfusionnow.org/rossi-e-cat-ht-energy-density-off-the-chart/#comment-16007 Ruby Carat Fri, 24 May 2013 15:41:27 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34747#comment-16007 Jane, This is an enormous amount of heat, way beyond any chemical source.

These scientists had access to the cell and were in control of all the wires.

It is ridiculous to assume there was malfeasance from them, or incompetency.

You are correct on one thing, the report is not peer-reviewed by mainstream science. I imagine they’ll be catching up at some point. Till then, these CMNS scientists are moving forward in attempts to develop the most clean, dense source of power humans are capable of at this time.

]]> Comment on Rossi E-Cat HT energy density “off-the-chart” by Ruby Carat http://coldfusionnow.org/rossi-e-cat-ht-energy-density-off-the-chart/#comment-16006 Ruby Carat Fri, 24 May 2013 15:36:46 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34747#comment-16006 A. Green, The scientists wrote in the report that the power to the first test cell that melt the interior steel/ceramic chamber was 1000 Watts.

After that, the team reduced the electrical Power In to the resistor coils to 360 Watts for test 2 and 3.

Here is a direct link to the report for you to read:
http://ecat.com/files/Indication-of-anomalous-heat-energy-production-in-a-reactor-device.pdf

]]> Comment on The Experimental Investigation of the E-Cat HT, and Heuristics by AlainCo http://coldfusionnow.org/the-experimental-investigation-of-the-e-cat-ht-and-heuristics/#comment-16004 AlainCo Fri, 24 May 2013 15:34:18 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34974#comment-16004 Whath the model of Roland Benabou assume is a rational resistance to inconvenient facts.
It is not inherently negative I agree, however it is in a way strong resistance to change… sometimes fleeing forward to deny more and more…
Negativity is more often something egotic, valued in our individualist societies. A way to pretend be a rebel.

complementing that article, and your remarks, the great article of beanbou
http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/Groupthink%20IOM%207p%20paper.pdf
may put things in persepective.

denial is sometim just a way to escape the inconvenient realism, about unavoidable loss because others a in denial too… reinforced by the fact that since dissenters are siented, the few who are ready to accept fact doubt of their own eyes because they assume others are not enough stupid not to see that if it it true…

the mathematical model is funny because it explain some observed strange facts…
like the fact the the more the truth is becoming clear, the more violent is the violence agains dissenters.
it explain also why subordinates seeing the truth better than their boss, follow their boss denial, by interest, because they cannot change their boss opinion.

better feel happy and die, than feel stupid and die.

read also that pamphlet about real case of denia like Challenger crash, Enron, Subprimes
http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/Patterns%20of%20Denial%204l%20fin.pdf

Benabou is a great author! too bad he is not more known.
Benabou, Taleb and Kuhn explain LENR tragedy.

]]> Comment on The Experimental Investigation of the E-Cat HT, and Heuristics by AB http://coldfusionnow.org/the-experimental-investigation-of-the-e-cat-ht-and-heuristics/#comment-16001 AB Fri, 24 May 2013 14:00:35 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34974#comment-16001 My two cents on science and pathological skepticism:

http://i.imgur.com/bPzARpx.jpg

]]> Comment on The Experimental Investigation of the E-Cat HT, and Heuristics by pov http://coldfusionnow.org/the-experimental-investigation-of-the-e-cat-ht-and-heuristics/#comment-15999 pov Fri, 24 May 2013 13:51:50 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34974#comment-15999 “Distorted thinking is recognized by its characteristics: narrow, resistant to change, biased toward negativity, and often irrational.”

I disagree with that assertion. Rationality is often more of an impediment than anything else. That is because it is nothing more than a notion rooted in commonly held viewpoints. Negativity and “resistance to change” are likewise irrelevant to what you term distorted thinking.

Naysayers ( I applaud your putting skeptic in quotes) do have an underlying motivation but it is not based on what you’ve laid about here.

]]> Comment on The Experimental Investigation of the E-Cat HT, and Heuristics by AlainCo http://coldfusionnow.org/the-experimental-investigation-of-the-e-cat-ht-and-heuristics/#comment-15994 AlainCo Fri, 24 May 2013 12:44:25 +0000 http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=34974#comment-15994 nice analysis.

what shock me about some critics is the precision of details discussed, the clear errors in reading, and beside that missing the human factors, the risk analysis of various actors, and the big picture…
From far it may look like stupidity, incompetence, lowest emotional-quotient, but is is in fact simply distortion, and probably a mix of usual low-EQ quite common in some profession and huge bias, based on impression to be protected by consensus (impunity) and fear to look stupid to oneself (see the theory of roland benanou).

]]>